User talk:Nemov/Archives/2023/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WP:PRIMARYSOURCE
Can you just look at WP:PRIMARYSOURCE number 3? Primary sources are fine for certain types of information. Dream Focus 23:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Dream Focus do you think the article should display every video the subject has recorded? Of course not. So what videos should be listed? The easy answer are videos that have received secondary coverage. Nemov (talk) 23:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Editor discretion can be done here. You don't need someone telling you how to think, and making decisions for you. We had this discussion two years ago. Talk:Star_Wars_Theory#mentioning_some_of_the_famous_people_he_interviewed Then I find you put a pointless tag in the article you know no one will ever bother to listen to. Its been there since February, people just ignoring it. No reason to have it there. Dream Focus 23:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Dream Focus if you can find secondary sources to justify inclusion you can remove the template. An editor deciding what videos are important sounds like original research. Nemov (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Editor discretion can be done here. You don't need someone telling you how to think, and making decisions for you. We had this discussion two years ago. Talk:Star_Wars_Theory#mentioning_some_of_the_famous_people_he_interviewed Then I find you put a pointless tag in the article you know no one will ever bother to listen to. Its been there since February, people just ignoring it. No reason to have it there. Dream Focus 23:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)