User talk:Nemov/Archives/2023/February
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Personal attack at ANI
Just FYI this use of WP:LAWYER is a personal attack which falls outside of the appropriate use of that term as laid out at Wikipedia:Wikilawyering#Use and misuse of the term. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- My use of the term was perfectly appropriate:
Weaponizing policies, guidelines, noticeboards and other Wikipedia systems with the goal of deprecating an editor rather than of resolving a problem.
- That isn't a personal attack, it's a clear picture of exactly what is happening. If you disagree that's fine, but it's in scope. Nemov (talk) 16:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- "Those utilizing the term should take care that they are not violating behavioral guidelines such as WP:No personal attacks and WP:Civility. Most important is to use it to discuss specific actions and not editors." You didn't comment on actions, you only commented on the editor and you did so directly[1]. That is a personal attack, note that they're attacks even if they're true. "But they actually are an asshole!" isn't a defense for calling someone an asshole. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I commented on specific actions. You disagree, please move along. Thanks - Nemov (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- It says "you" not "your actions" or "your comments." Thats a personal attack, don't do it again. You have been warned. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I commented on specific actions. You disagree, please move along. Thanks - Nemov (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- "Those utilizing the term should take care that they are not violating behavioral guidelines such as WP:No personal attacks and WP:Civility. Most important is to use it to discuss specific actions and not editors." You didn't comment on actions, you only commented on the editor and you did so directly[1]. That is a personal attack, note that they're attacks even if they're true. "But they actually are an asshole!" isn't a defense for calling someone an asshole. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:ESPN Press photo of Tom Hart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ESPN Press photo of Tom Hart.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)