User talk:Natural Cut

Welcome...

Hello, Natural Cut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 七星 (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, although I wish I could read your name! Japanese is such an interesting language. I guess the computer I'm using doesn't have the right typeset. Natural Cut (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw your edits to Igor Panarin. Keep the good work up! And about username, I do believe it is Chinese. A translation would be "seven stars". Well, see you! -down load | sign! 02:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Greetings...

Hello, Natural Cut, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.

I hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! OlEnglish (talk) 04:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your copyedits to Plunketts Creek Bridge No. 3. I have added a map showing the New Purchase and a brief mention of it to the Treaty of Fort Stanwix article too. Welcome and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will add New Purchase to my ever growing list of articles to expand or make - thanks for the redirect and your kind words on the bridge article. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at the PR in the next 12 hours or so. Thanks for the heads up, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to TPK. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC) -[reply]

Very peculiar. I was using User:Lupin/Recent IP edits, but I've noticed it has some other bugs with Google Chrome such as having to reload the page after a certain point. I guess I'll just go back to using Firefox - Chrome works faster when I'm at work. Natural Cut (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC) -[reply]

Unfortunately, I've noticed there have been some issues with certain browsers. I knew you weren't creating any vandalism, but I left you a note, anyway, simply to let you know that there might be an issue with edit summaries. Good luck finding a browser that works! --Ericdn (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Quote sections[edit]

Hello, Natural Cut. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I know it was an automated message and I'm basically talking to myself, but the fragmented nature of these conversations has bugged me from the start. I think I'll keep this as a reminder in case I want to use it in the future! Natural Cut (talk) 06:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Natural Cut. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Napoleon[edit]

thanks for your thoughtful comments on Napoleon, am working on them. in this edit [1] you incorrectly removed a lot of spaces between words and linked words e.g. ofdue process. any ideas why? Tom B (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes actually, I noticed that after I had saved and thanked the user who corrected the errors. I was trying out 'wikiEd' in the gadgets section of my preferences, but apparently it did some weird stuff with the spacing. I would have caught it myself, but for instance when I click on the diff link there it doesn't highlight where the change occurred on due process. I stopped using the gadget; I do hope I helped more than I hurt. :-/ Natural Cut (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no worries, Tom B (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i think i've dealt with all the peer review points, Tom B (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i only really use wiked for find and replace as it takes up quite a bit of memory and is more complicated, though perhaps i should try and see make better use of its functionality. as you say, good practice to look at other peer reviews to pick up tips and diligent. Tom B (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar[edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me bust vandals using Huggle. -down load \| sign! 00:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Beret"Star[edit]

		The Che 'Beret'star
		"Hasta la Victoria Siempre" In recognition of your excellent proof reading, editing, and suggestions on Che (film) per peer review. These sorts of selfless time commitments are truly what makes Wikipedia flourish as an excellent learning resource. In appreciation, Redthoreau (talk)RT 03:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

download's special barnstar[edit]

		down load's special barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my talk page! -down load \| sign! 05:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just doing my job. Er, the thing I do when I have nothing to do at my job technically. Either way... :-P Natural Cut (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship[edit]

I think you should not censor my own userpage. I believe policies do not give you the freedom to do that, except under narrow circumstances. If I call censorship censorship, this is an expression of free speech. 70.137.184.193 (talk) 08:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems to have been a case of itchy trigger finger. But I the fact that the talk page (User talk:70.137.146.36) is separate from your own (User talk:70.137.184.193) is reason enough to make an account... Natural Cut (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, no problem. What in hell are lolwuts (I am old fart in the 60's) What spam is I know, its both what you get in the email and the mystery meat I eat fried with eggs. 70.137.184.193 (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 70.137.184.193 (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re getting an account. As far as I understand anonymous edits are perfectly legitimate. I noticed recently a new fad, where every 2nd edit of mine was reverted by terror hunters, then I had to explain why its not vandalism, then I could reinstate it. Why did that work previously? Why this terror hysteria now? Just like with Bush! Are you attracting too many wannabe vandal hunter militia and vandals, and too few real contributors? I would not be surprised, such exchange as I had it recently is going to piss contributors off. 70.137.184.193 (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review of Zaprešić[edit]

Thanks for your peer review of Zaprešić. I've posted replies to your post on the review page, so drop me a note if you want to provide further comments. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 19:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your responses. I have added a part about yat in the article and I believe it's fine now, so I'm closing the peer review. If you have more suggestions, please use my talk page. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 17:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to leave it open in case someone else decides to comment on the article. And no problem, I enjoy learning about the world through Wikipedia. Natural Cut (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Baldwin[edit]

My edits to theAlec Baldwin page have not been vandalism or unconstructive. Following the information given to me by yourself, I reverted the edit and included my reasoning. There is no need to use the sandbox, because I am not suggesting a radical change, just adding some simple information. 68.194.199.112 (talk) 02:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why reverted?[edit]

Please explain why you reverted my nomination for speedy deletion? The article was created by somebody as a joke. No person called 'Dan Quail' exists - the correct spelling and page is 'Dan Quayle'. I assume we are both refering to the former US vide-president here? How can you possibly revert this?--217.203.131.7 (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, I hit the revert button prematurely because I saw the article text and thought you were the vandal. It should stay a redirect. My apologies. Natural Cut (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I never noticed that the page had a history and was previously a redirect. I've switched it back to the original redirect. Thanks.--217.203.131.7 (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I'm glad you've noticed my work. A few of my Wiki friends have already copy-edited History of the Han Dynasty, but not much copy-edit attention has been given to my other Han Dynasty articles of late:

I'm working on Government of the Han Dynasty in one of my sandboxes right now. I'm already familiar with Anti-Qing sentiment, but haven't viewed the article in a while. I'll take another look sooner or later and see where I can help.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Yo thanks for the revert on my talk page. Appreciated. I'd be happy to critique any articles you want reviewed. Thanks again! --Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 02:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep you in mind if I ever take things to the next level and do some serious research etc. For now the only things on my plate are Wikipedia:Peer review/Terri Schiavo case/archive1 and the articles mentioned in the section above yours. Thanks for the offer! Natural Cut (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Just drop me a line if you ever need a critique. Cheers! --Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 04:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates[edit]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]