User talk:Nationalism

Re: your comments

I have no problem with the views of non-furries; a good number of my friends are not furries.. I have a problem with people whose views are thinly veiled insults. Your contributions to the furry articles are entirely negative, attempting to insert your point of view that "furry" = "kinky sex" despite your being informed multiple times by multiple editors that this is not in fact the case. I point out as examples the following: "That's an interesting point, but you masturbate to animals." "Before 1980 there weren't many published art pieces showing animal or humanoid animal sexual organs in pornographic positions." and "With homosexuality/pedophilia, one sees that people stick with that designation for their entire life.", in which you yet again compare furry fandom insultingly to such things as pedophilia and intimate that it involves animal sex. I should point out that your interpretation of the demographic makeup of the fandom is incorrect. The majority of the furs I know are not teenagers, have jobs, and are successful in their lives.

I highly suggest that if you actually want to improve the furry articles, that you find some actual sources to back up any of your claims - sources that do not include "Crush Yiff Destroy" or Encyclopedia Dramatica. In the meantime, stop poking at the other editors. If you have something to contribute, you're welcome to. If you're simply taking potshots at a convenient target, stop. Tony Fox (arf!) 02:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagelberg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nagelberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Dissident Aggressor 22:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)