User talk:Mythology3757

February 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Shellwood (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. MarnetteD|Talk 20:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Copyright policy[edit]

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism after final warning; being about 90% vandalism-only, and 10% obnoxious; for example, your edits at List of current monarchies.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mythology3757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for telling the truth for instance how Oceania is the name of the continent Australia is in and how the American presidential system resembles an elective monarchy. It seems unfair and a little fascist to block someone for constructive edits. I also NEVER personally attacked anyone, it’s straight up lies and I’m very angry about this whole situation all I tried to do was improve the information on this website but apparently the extreme-left revisionism has gone too far.

Decline reason:

If you think that you were telling the truth, then I would question if you have the skills needed to participate here. The UN has not renamed the Australian continent, Oceania is a wider area. You personally attacked someone with this edit. That, combined with your criticism here, leads me to think Wikipedia is better off with you blocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mythology3757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I did was try to improve information. I have learned my lesson, can you please unblock me? Mythology3757 (talk) 23:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be acknowledging you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Why, then, should we consider unblocking you? Yamla (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mythology3757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24022 was submitted on Feb 21, 2019 16:07:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mythology3757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24032 was submitted on Feb 21, 2019 19:39:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mythology3757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24051 was submitted on Feb 23, 2019 12:23:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, they were in the #wikipedia-en-unblock IRC channel where they said they're sorry my edits were misinterpreted as “vandalism” and denied calling someone a retard or having removed sources (with ample personal attacks added for good measure). Huon (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS[edit]

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30917 This user is seeking unblock on UTRS #30917 --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 15:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]