User talk:Mr. Gerbear/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - September 2013
Issue XXXIV .svg)
|
Project Eurovision monthly
|
Click image below to read full edition
| ||||
|
| ||||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
| ||||||
| Total Number of Members | Active Members | Inactive Members | Total Number of Articles | Number of Good Articles | Number of Featured Articles | Require Improvements |
| 74 | 51 | 23 | 4883 | 16 | 4 | 2076 |
|
|
|
 23
|
|
|
 1
|
|
To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.
| ||||||
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 11:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Nokia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nokia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Worrying concern
Hi Gerbear,
I am writing as I have a worrying concern regarding something which you raised at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2014. You mentioned that you also write for escunited.com, which concerns me slightly. The project has used that website in the past for references unbeknown that you were also an editor for the website. I'm concerned that in using some of the articles knowing now that you're an editor for that website may have placed us in breach of WP:COI, as we are using sources which may have been written by a fellow member of Project Eurovision. Because of your admittance of being an editor for that website, you may have inadvertently placed yourself under scope of WP:OUTING, which needs to be handled with extreme caution for your personal safety more than anything. I had read one of the articles on that website regarding Conchita Wurst, which at the bottom of it clearly shows your Wikipedia user name, which any Wikipedian who knows you from here and were visiting that site would easily figure out your real identity. I have raised this with you as I sincerely care about your personal safety more than anything. Forgive me for bringing this to your attention, and I hope you may appreciate why I have done so. Wesley Mᴥuse 19:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, Wesley. Thanks for your concern. I did keep the conflict of interest in the back of my mind but as I haven't specifically used any ESC United links in sourcing my edits (I link to the original source), we should be mostly fine. I only started working for ESC United this month, so any previous links to them are outside of this COI. I have edited my talk page now to declare that I write for them. I think going forward, news reports would be better sourced to other sites which carry the same information. It's no big loss.
- As for concerns regarding my personal safety, again, thank you very much for your concern, but this is my online handle pretty much everywhere. I'm not all that worried with my internet life spilling over into real life, because they already overlap considerably. Thanks. c: Mr. Gerbear|Talk 00:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Phew!!! I feel so relieved now after reading your response, as I was starting to get anxious and overly-worried about all of this. Indeed a declaration on your user page should help others be aware of your connections to ESC United, and thus avoid any potential COI's. From what I've gathered, COI's can become nasty business on Wikipedia. I value you as a Wikipedian friend, which is why I started to worry upon this revelation. I didn't want to see you become victim of any witch-hunts and end up facing blocking sanctions. On a side note, I did read your article on Conchita Wurst, and I must say I agreed 100% with the remarks you made about those commentators who posted negative things about the singer. You have my utmost respect for that! And again, my deepest thanks for stepping in at the right time over at ESC 2014 and the debate involving myself and another editor. It did frustrate me that deep in my mind I was trying to be helpful and address valid reasons as to why 2 out of the 3 countries warranted inclusion. But the more I tried to present those points, the more I could see them being dismissed and it was causing a serious headache. I'm one of those people who says things as it is, and with brutal honesty at times. Before my mother passed away, she always told me that it was best to speak the whole truth to people, no matter how brutal it came across, as honesty was the best policy and people would respect me more for that. I do get saddened when I have tried my best to seek a peaceful truce with the other editor, and that offering gets thrown back in my face time after time. I appreciate that they may be one of those editor's who likes to go it alone without being bothered by others. But in an environment like Wikipedia which is community-based and teamwork-orientated; then being in isolation will never work, it only alienates oneself from the rest of the community. Anyhow, keep up the good work, and I look forward to working with you more in the near future. Regards, Wesley Mᴥuse 00:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Eurovision project discussion - "other awards"
Hey, in regards to the RFC which is closed at the "Eurovision Project" - it was said in it's conclusion that a significant support is to stay with a mixture of prose and tables for the "Other awards" section. If I understand correctly, you agreed to stick to prose only. Wethear I missundersttod you, wethear you did agree but changed your mind or wethear I did understand you correctly, I would be glad if you can clarify your position over there. אומנות (talk) 10:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please avoid forum shopping, it is not favourable by administrators. Wesley Mᴥuse 13:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - October 2013
| Issue XXXV
|
Project Eurovision monthly
|
Click image below to read full edition
| ||||
|
| ||||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
| ||||||
| Total Number of Members | Active Members | Inactive Members | Total Number of Articles | Number of Good Articles | Number of Featured Articles | Require Improvements |
| 66 | 48 | 18 | 4906 | 16 | 4 | 1368 |
| 8
|
3
|
5
|
23
|
|
|
708
|
|
To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.
| ||||||
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:30, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The White Queen (TV series)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The White Queen (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:San Salvador Island
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:San Salvador Island. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:John Calvin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Calvin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Best practice guidelines for Public Relations professionals
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Best practice guidelines for Public Relations professionals. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)