User talk:Moheen/Archive 2013

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Moheener Ghoraguli discography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 05:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Rajnitibidgon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

March 26 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blogger
Moheener Ghoraguli discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done![edit]

Well done! This was a good edit. Leela Bratee (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Moheen Reeyad,

Behalf of WikiProject Bangladesh I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject Bangladesh, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. Thank you. -- Leela Bratee (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Rajnitibidgon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jalebi[edit]

A jalebi for you

Here is one jalebi for you. Jalebi is a sweet popular in countries of the Indian Subcontinent, specially in India, Pakistan, Bangaldesh. Hope you'll like it.
Thank you.
☸TilottamaTitlee (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

March 26 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blogger
Moheener Ghoraguli discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jac16888 Talk 11:06, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Join the WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League![edit]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shironamhin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keys and Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Theater Institute Chattagram was accepted[edit]

Theater Institute Chattagram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Kazi Ahmad Shafin was accepted[edit]

Kazi Ahmad Shafin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 13:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chittagong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commemorative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Writer's Barnstar
Dear, Moheen Reeyad, Here is a Barnstar for you. Tilottama Titlee (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks my dear! Moheen Reeyad (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Tilottama (August 13)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Moheen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at AfC Tilottama (disambiguation) was accepted[edit]

Tilottama (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tilottama (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tilottama (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as __NOINDEX__, which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Tilottama (disambiguation). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Template:Jahajee tracks was accepted[edit]

Template:Jahajee tracks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 20:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Template:Jahajee was accepted[edit]

Template:Jahajee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Leela Bratee (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajnitibidgon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajnitibidgon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajnitibidgon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GregJackP Boomer! 00:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice[edit]

You were previously informed of the discussion at the administrators' Noticeboard here, although I note that you have not commented. In relation to this issue, this is a notice that you should not

  • Create any new article, template or category, or
  • Participate in any part of the Articles For Creation process

until the issue is concluded. Note that you may be blocked if you do so. Thank you, Black Kite (talk) 08:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moheen Reeyad, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Black Kite (talk) 09:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Jude Aher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nyack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of multiple accounts, confirmed by CheckUser. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  The Bushranger One ping only 15:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moheen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have noticed that my account has been blocked for the reason to using multiple accounts which is conflict with other user Leela Bratee. This is a wrong blame upon me. I have no fixed IP address. My pages was accepted by her (Leela Bratee) but I thought that was a group work. I don't know about this kinds of limitations. Many article which is created by me those has been nominated for deletion! But those pages was created about notable person and topic. I do not understand, what is the problem when my user page is looks like a article? But no one inform me about that and when I know that I edited my user page. I am so upset, now I realized my mistake. Please accept my apologies. I hope my account will be reopened soon.

Decline reason:

Per Bishonen's comment below and the SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Moheen Reeyad (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from blocking admin[edit]

The editing from the three accounts appears as deceitful, regardless of whether there are one, two or three individuals involved. Please see this thread on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moheen Reeyad/Archive. Bishonen | talk 11:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Advice[edit]

The principal reason why I believe you are blocked is that you abused the Articles for creation process, by approving your friends' submissions frivolously. Just claiming notability is not enough – you need all three of notable, verifiable and suitable to pass. I sent one of your submissions to AfD because even though it was a list of works by a notable author, it was largely unverifiable and (in my view) an unnecessary content fork. Most of your submissions should have been declined at AfC on verifiability grounds.

If you want to be unblocked, my advice is as follows:

  • Accept you abused the AfC process and promise you will not review submissions, at least for the short term.
  • Explain you understand that you cannot add unverifiable content to Wikipedia, and what a typical reliable source is.
  • Find yourself a mentorship program and state the name of your mentor here. Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area explains where you can find an adopter. Since you are blocked, you will need to email them using the "E-mail this user" link on the left hand menu.
  • Mark clearly which other accounts share your IP network (I think there's a template for this – somebody else will be able to advise)

Once you've done this, send another unblock request.

Admins – I believe the root of this problem is due to inexperience, not malice, so I think they should be given a chance and mentored. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:23, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ritchie, thanks for weighing in. The abuse of AfC was only part of the reason I blocked, though certainly that's the part that harmed Wikipedia the most. There was also Ponyo's CheckUser report and the userpage business. Can you suggest some innocent explanation (inexperience?) for the combination of a) userpages that look like articles, b) links to these userpages in mainspace, piped to make them look like article links, and c) removal of Jackmcbarn's userpage tags? Or can you, Moheen? Because I'm afraid that three-step procedure is too much for my good faith. Diffs to the tag removals no longer work, but my original comment on them can be seen here. P.S. But I won't stand in the way of an unblock if Moheen succeeds in convincing a reviewing admin. Bishonen | talk 09:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Hmmm. I believe two of the accounts declared they were dating, and I can easily picture the pair of them editing on laptops sat next to each other and communicating verbally. User pages looking like articles – well, my own user page abuses {{infobox person}} though it's an obvious parody in my case. The main space link was March 26, presumably one of the editors' birthday. I think it all boils down to a lack of understanding that Wikipedians are generally not notable. But didn't Moheen assert that he understood WP:N? Hmmm. Still, he won't be able to pull the wool over a mentor's eyes, and general consensus is that if you fail or give up adoption courses then you get reboocked so it's not the end of the world. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The mainspace link? I'm not going back and counting them, but there were a number of mainspace links. And the userpage tag removals points straight at the article-like userpages + the mainspace linking being systematic deception. You don't seem to be taking my point, but I don't know how else to put it: the trouble to my mind is a, b and c taken together. Bishonen | talk 16:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moheen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have sent a unblock request but no one response to unblock me. So this is my second request with apology and commitment to unblock me. * I committed that, further I have not abused the AfC process and promise I will not review submissions, at least for the short term. * I understand that, I cannot add unverifiable content to Wikipedia. * I ensure that, right now I will be careful about my IP address. So on request, please give me a chance. Moheen Reeyad (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry but my good faith doesn't extend this far. I concur with Bishonen's reasoning for blocking. Laser brain (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moheen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have sent my second request with apology and commitment but no one response to unblock me.

  • I committed that, further I have not abused the AfC process and promise I will not review submissions, at least for the short term.
  • I understand that, I cannot add unverifiable content to Wikipedia.
  • I ensure that, right now I will be careful about my IP address. So on request, please give me a chance.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry but my good faith doesn't extend this far. I concur with Bishonen's reasoning for blocking. PS: repeating your unblock request doesn't work very well; we can repeat also. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moheen/Archive_2013&oldid=1181319350"