User talk:Mm35173

Science, Religion & Mathematics

You provided to all a very clear and deep conception at Talk:Main_Page/Archive_42#Religion_as_a_main_category_at_the_Main_Page. Yesterday I was thinking about Mathematics, which I have not studied deeply, as one of our main human achievements and the basis of much knowledge; it was a delight to read your conception. Also the reference to the Hermits. Best Regards --GalaazV 04:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for tracking down the copyright info on Image:Pope-john-paul-ii-01.jpg. I have now deleted the image, you may want to keep an eye out to see if it reappears. Thanks again.--nixie 04:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Delaware Images

I'm sorry I created such a crises. I am the "editor" who uploaded these images and I clearly did not fully understand all the implications of what I was doing. I have now removed all images from this template, and agree it should be deleted as proposed. If you still feel you must pursue the details of this matter the persons to contact are Ann Baker Horsey, Curator of Collections, Delaware Department of State, Division of Historical & Cultural Affairs, and Jeff Hague, Registrar of Regulations, Legislative Council. They both gave permission and stated the images were not copyright. They are fully aware of what I am doing, know how to contact me, and presumably would have if there was a problem. The images are owned by them and not the Public Archives. Much as I appreciate the effort to argue the point, this is not a FOIA issue. I made no such application.

Please understand that my intentions are the best and I consider myself fully accountable for what I do, including making appropriate corrections. I do not pretend to be a copyright expert, but am doing my best to learn, and appreciate all the worldwide expert advice I am getting. I presume from your statements you do have some special expertise on the matter. If you think a more "authoritative" answer needs to be received regarding the use of these images, I think the professional thing would be to let me work it, after receiving your suggestions. It is what I would do for you in a reverse situation. None of us like to be trashed to our peers, even unintentionally or incorrectly, and doing so only reflects poorly on Wikipedia and the cause it promotes.

If you do speak to these people, I would at least appreciate the courtesy of hearing the results of the conversation.

stilltim 04:04, 7 October 2005 (UTC) Italic text

Harold Haley (judge)

You tagged this as a speedy delete. A little searching revealed that it was a section of an account of a quite well known incident. I have rewritten the article with some references. DES ^(talk) 21:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Correction

I did not create Image:Masturbation.jpg! See its commons page, please. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-10-23 T 13:56:51 Z

Image:Samuel Alito.jpg

Could you please explain your dispute over the source? I'm not sure what your confusion is, by calling an official U.S. judicial photo "unsourced." Thanks. Postdlf 16:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

St. Stephen

Thanks for adding that to Martyr! --Dpr 03:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cape Cod house.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cape Cod house.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 15:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Oops! That image was indeed created by me, and in fact was my own house. Sorry, I have been away for a while. --Mm35173 02:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Spoken version of United States Congress

I've already finished recording and uploading United States Senate, and I noticed that you had an editing notice on the United States Congress article that is almost a year old. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't stepping on any toes. Unless I hear otherwise, I plan on starting work on the article tomorrow, after United States House of Representatives. --Omaryak 08:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:NC River Basins.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NC River Basins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Newmancofa.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 15:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:I3 fair use

A tag has been placed on Template:I3 fair use requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template

In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mm35173. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mars Tension-leg Platform after Katrina.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mars Tension-leg Platform after Katrina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mm35173. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mm35173. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)