User talk:Mj thenovelatre

February 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anne Hathaway has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anne Hathaway was changed by Mj thenovelatre (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885665 on 2015-02-18T15:29:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nasrin Abasi[edit]

The article Nasrin Abasi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 15:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure what you know about how Wikipedia works. You can't just add claims that so-and-so had schizophrenia: anyone can say so, but is it true? You need to provide sources for any such claims, so other editors (and readers) can verify what you write. Hope this is clear: read WP:V if not. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop at once. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Friedrich Nietzsche, you may be blocked from editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Immanuel Kant. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Plato, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You won't get anywhere doing this - every change you make will be reverted by other editors. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked. --John (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Twelver, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In your edit you made a claim that Taylor Swift is a "Twelver". WP:BLP applies across the entire encyclopedia, any statements about living persons MUST be scrupulously sourced from reliable sources. Your assertions about Miss Swift were not, especially the "iml.jou.ufl.edu" information - not only did your asserted claim not appear at that site, that website was a student project and would not qualify as a reliable source. Shearonink (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references can be easy[edit]

Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
Then click on "Templates".
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.

Before clicking on Save page, check that a References header ==References== is near the end of the article.
And check that {{Reflist}} is directly underneath that header.

7. Click on Save page. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.
Hope this helps, --Shearonink (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To use this message, place {{subst:User:Shearonink/ref}} on User:talk pages when needed.

Re: Why not real?[edit]

Schizophrenia is one of the English Wikipedia's featured articles. It is requested that you discuss on this article's talk page before editing. Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 21:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. An edit that you recently made to Taylor Swift seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Taylor Swift.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Rebb ing 20:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deity. Marianna251TALK 13:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 07:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mj thenovelatre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We must work together to solve vandalism. By blocking we stay against each other not the vandalism. We must stay together to perish the vandalism. Please, help me to kill the vandalism inside of my mind. Mj thenovelatre (talk) 8:29 am, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

No. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Demonyms[edit]

Please stop changing "American" to "US" on political articles. US is not a demonym (adjective used to describe people). People who live in the United States are called Americans. If you persist, given your recent editing history, it will be treated as vandalism. General Ization ^Talk 20:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Clinton. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You gave no reason for this edit and it is not consistent with how such information appears in other article. Please always use edit summaries when editing highly-visible articles, and make sure that your edits adhere to our policies and guidelines. In other words, please stop making these kinds of changes to articles. - Mr X 20:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Adolf Hitler, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]