User talk:Mitsuhirato

Welcome!

Hello, Mitsuhirato, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

response[edit]

[not sure exactly what the appropriate response process is, so i'm doing it here] I understand your point of view and will review some of the finance topics for direct contribution vs. reference to external reading. Thanks, KHM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khmarks (talk • contribs) 01:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

contribution[edit]

The reference to the text added to the Finance and several other sections is meant to provide the reader an authoritative reference on the subject. The additions are not spam...and given that there are very few suggested readings or texts for many of the finance topics, it would make sense to add leading books for reading. Just because I am a co-author of one of the first ones that I suggested does not mean it is less meaningful or valuable. I appreciate your concern, but respectfully ask that you not remove these additions unless you have a valid and defensible reason. Regards, KHM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khmarks (talk • contribs) 01:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ugur Basak 07:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Russo-Turkish War, 1877–1878. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Telex 12:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Melbourne logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Melbourne logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Econ quotations in Economics article?[edit]

Not exactly what you suggested, but I did think about your earlier suggestion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Economics/Archive_2 on 14:21, 22 May 2007 when I added the following Reference in Economics: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economics&diff=363011421&oldid=362107726 --Thomasmeeks (talk) 01:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NAB[edit]

NAB simply does not do "investment banking" which would have to include M&A advisory, so pls dont add that to its activities —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmarsden (talk • contribs) 22:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NAB itself calls it "Corporate & Institutional Banking" and so that's what it should be in the article as well. Nowhere does NAB describe itself as an investment bank. Why on earth are you so keen on that term ?? Rmarsden (talk) 13:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Australia Bank. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantitative easing[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quantitative easing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Caparn (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of people involved with the French Resistance[edit]

Hello Mitsuhirato, I have just cleaned up and expanded a bit the List of people involved with the French Resistance which you created. Thanks for getting this page started. I notice that you have interests in war history and economics. I share these interests, albeit more in history with a French-language angle in the former case and more in business and industrial economics than finance in the latter case. Don't hesitate to call on me if I may be of help.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quantitative easing discussion[edit]

There is a discussion going on at Talk:Quantitative easing on a topic you have discussed before. You are invited to participate. Lagrange613 (talk) 05:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment[edit]

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:International student enrolments.png[edit]

The file File:International student enrolments.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused chart, no other obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]