User talk:Milesaway0
Welcome![edit]
Hi Milesaway0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 00:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've blocked you from editing the article. You are welcome to propose your changes on the talk page, accompanied by suitable sources. – bradv🍁 01:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
unblock[edit]
Milesaway0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand I was edit warring andnot warned before suspended but I agree that I was reverting roxy's deletion of my additions which may be viewed by some as a suspendible offense. This seems to be a special case, because roxy the dog (other side and original reverter in edit war) and nathium( spelling*) were not suspended.
Seems to be that roxy the dog and roxy's friends are teaming up to bully me and make page biased towards their opinion, they seem to gang up with their admin friends and force one sided wiki pages that are weak.
Several users also take a similar stance to me on the talk page, some users posted recently, I'm not the only person alive with this stance.
roxy apparently asked bradv to suspend me for an edit war between roxy and myself, roxy was the original reverter and was deleting, not adding like I was, roxy did not get suspended also!...roxy did not give valid reason for revision and demanded conversation but then didn't converse nor give valid reasons for revisions. and roxy the dog deserve#a suspension and bradv deserves permanent ban from being admin, I find it extremely u likely that bradv is not taking sides and accidentally forgot to suspend roxy also.Milesaway0 (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are now blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You will need to address that, and only that, in any future unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Milesaway0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello , I apologize for trying to get my additions back through other accounts, I was also wrong to edit war with roxy the dog and not use talk page and other references, I was unaware of many rules before. I apologize for I seemed to have coatracked by not adding most of this information to a more appropriate page.
Decline reason:
You surely aren't trying to claim that you needed to know we had a rule against this, before trying actively to mislead the community via your abuse of multiple accounts?!? Yamla (talk) 21:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I didn't enter that I wasn't aware of multiple accounting being devious, I entered being unaware about how to use talk page, the appropriate page to post onto. Also roxy the dog told me to delete the unblock and start over. Milesaway0 (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- I did no such thing. -Roxy the effin dog . wooF 17:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
seems roxy or yamla removed it...the post roxy made on my talk page...
" In order for a block to be lifted, you need to look to your own behaviour, because it was your own behaviour, not mine that got you blocked. An appeal like that above will get you nowhere. I suggest you remove it, and start again. Try to appeal in terms of how your behaviour will improve in the area for which you were sanctioned. commenting about others behaviour will get you nowhere. -Roxy the effin dog . wooF 16:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC) "
Milesaway0 (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Declined unblock requests cannot be removed. Please do not remove them again. Tknifton (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
Milesaway0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello , I apologize for trying to get my additions back through other accounts, I was also wrong to edit war with roxy the dog and not use talk page and other references. I apologize for I seemed to have coatracked by not adding most of this information to a more appropriate page. Milesaway0 (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. This request is exactly the same as your last one, grammar mistakes and all, which does not show that you have reflected on your block. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 11:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock[edit]
Milesaway0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I apologize for multiple accounting, I won’t do it again, I was wrong because one account per user unless admin...system is in place to handle trolling and teach unaware users.
I didn’t realize edit warring is wrong even if the user is correct. I understand now that two similar revisions without using talk page is edit warring, which means we are both guilty of edit warring, I did not understand this before, I am a newish user and was not aware.
I won’t edit war anymore, Ill talk to more than one admin about the issues of trolling.
I also understand coatracking now and understand better pages to place my information. Milesaway0 (talk) 18:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your unblock request is somewhat difficult to understand. You might want to work on your English grammar skills if you want to contribute to English Wikipedia. Right now, though, the issue is your sock puppetry. I have no idea why you would create a second account that impersonates Doc James, but right now I think the standard offer is your best bet. Show us that you can go six months without sock puppetry or any other form of block evasion, and we'll reconsider your block then. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock[edit]
Milesaway0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am basically new to Wikipedia, I sock puppeteered once and not for fun either. I have learned that sock puppeting may result in a ban which allows vandals to remove my work and disallows me from conversing about it on talk pages, I won’t sock puppet in the future.
Sockpuppeting is wrong because only one account is allowed per user unless that user is an administrator. Policy for rule breakers getting banned without warning is in place to teach unaware users or to teach trolls a lesson. I have learned a lesson because I have been disallowed access for a long time, have studied much of the rules and learned the possible punishments.Milesaway0 (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you've already been told, your best bet for being unblocked is to take the standard offer and not edit for 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.