User talk:Meservy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I've replied here instead of the IP address, I hope you don't mind. Yes, I agree the 178,000 population figure vastly understates the region's population and size. How about this?

Salt Lake City has a population of 178,858 as of 2008. [3] The Salt Lake City metropolitan area spans Salt Lake, Summit and Tooele counties, and has a total estimated population of 1,018,826. Salt Lake City is further situated in a larger urban area known as the Wasatch Front, and until 2003 the Ogden-Clearfield metro area within it was considered part of the Salt Lake City metropolitan area.[4] The total estimated population of the Wasatch Front is approximately 2,150,000. [this is the addition now] While Salt Lake City is only a marginal portion of the entire Salt Lake Valley, the entire valley is usually referred to as "Salt Lake City."

I didn't want to mention anything else because most of the metro area details are already there. What do you think? CL — 19:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delayed response - still getting Internet sorted out at my new post here in Moscow. The addition sentence is fine, though I think I'd say "often" rather than "usually." But I think that's pretty well covered elsewhere in the article.
The point I was trying to get at is more along the lines of [proposed addition] "Its population figure understates the feel of the city, since its growth has long since exceeded the city limits established in the mid-1800s."
My thinking is that people see 178,000 and think they are coming to a Jackson, Mississippi or Amarillo or Brownsville, Texas. Then they arrive and find something that feels more like Buffalo or Colorado Springs or even Albuquerque. One reason is because places like Millcreek, South Salt Lake and Sugarhouse have sort of lost their pioneer-era identity and been economically and culturally subsumed. (Sugarhouse, for that matter, now lies partly inside and partly outside the city.) That's what I meant by 21st South being a little artificial as a boundary. Then, many of the adjoining cities like Murray, Midvale and West Valley have also lost (or never really had) their own distinctive character. Nobody makes these mistakes with California or the Atlantic coast; everyone expects Los Angeles to run unbroken into Irvine, Anaheim, Whittier, etc., or that Washington DC becomes Hyattsville becomes Greenbelt becomes Laurel and so on to Baltimore and beyond. But when most people think of Utah, they don't think of urban sprawl.
Anyway, see what you think. It's not what I would consider a critical edit by any means. Meservy (talk) 07:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First off, excuse me for my belated response. I seemed to have not watchlisted this page. Also, I understand the reason for your belated response, as I assume that being a diplomat is a very important job and whatnot. Anyway, I totally agree with your reasoning, as many people don't think of Salt Lake to contain a metro area of 1,000,000+ people. How about this addition? I think we can combine the two somehow, but make it sound like NPOV too:

While Salt Lake City is only a marginal portion of the entire Salt Lake Valley, the entire valley is usually referred to as "Salt Lake City." Its population figure understates the feel of the city, since its growth has long since exceeded the city limits established in the mid-1800s.

I'll go ahead and add that, and we can change it as needed. Take your time with the reply and good luck with the new post out in Russia. Regards, CL — 23:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. I think that's good, succinct, NPOV and gets the accurate impression across. Thanks for your all your help. Regards from hot (though probably not as hot as SLC) Moscow, Meservy (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seventy Lists[edit]

Note that there are two lists on Wikipedia that are kept current on this issue:

These have the complete list of all members of the quorums of seventy. --Trödel 01:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those. I hadn't been aware. Could both links perhaps be added to the Seventy article? What do you think? Meservy (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Freedom Square St Johns.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Freedom Square St Johns.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you tagged this one. It already had a valid copyright tag. I've added a PD-self tag in addition to the existing one. Let me know if there is some problem. Meservy (talk) 06:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:0811-Tony Grove 5.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:0811-Tony Grove 5.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 23:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tag added. Thanks for the notice. Meservy (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas[edit]

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Jays (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Clarke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aron Kader, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ogden and Provo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georg Scherer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Pichlicher Verlag, 2010), pp. 53-54, with background from Johann Szegö, "Alt-Wien neu entdeckt" (Vienna: Metroverlag, 2010, p. 36 </ref> 70-year-old [[Elisabeth Plainacher|Elise Plainacher]] of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Frederic Nausea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Grau''' about 1496 in [[Waischenfeld]], [[Germany]]; † [[6 February]] [[1552]] in [[Trient]]) was the Catholic [[Bishop]] of the [[Archdiocese of Vienna]]. Nausea is the [[Latin]] equivalent

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hi-Fi murders may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the murders. She had recently become engaged and planned to be married on 5 August 1974.<ref>{{cite news |title=2 Hill airmen arrested in brutal Ogden killings |publisher=Deseret News |date=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Meservy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Meservy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Ulisses Soares[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulisses Soares--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Meservy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logan City, Utah Twinning[edit]

Hullo. I see that a few years ago you edited the article on Logan, Utah to add that the city is twinned with Herford, Germany. I work for Logan City and have asked the Mayor's office if they know anything about this. They don't. To their knowledge, Logan is not twinned with any other cities. Are you able to provide a reference for this assertion? All the best. Bibliothecarivs (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t remember doing this. It’s possible I saw a reference somewhere, but it’s uncharacteristic of me not to include a reference. I’m puzzled and can’t explain the edit. Go ahead and remove it. Meservy (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]