User talk:McrPhilosophy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Sub-title card for the BBC Bowie documentary Cracked Actor.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sub-title card for the BBC Bowie documentary Cracked Actor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Title card for the BBC Bowie documentary Cracked Actor.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Title card for the BBC Bowie documentary Cracked Actor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cinema 1: The Movement Image, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:English edition of Deleuze's Cinema 1 (most recent).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:English edition of Deleuze's Cinema 1 (most recent).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology cover image.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology cover image.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Begoon 00:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delegates at the British Society for Phenomenology 2019 conference.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Delegates at the British Society for Phenomenology 2019 conference.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Begoon 00:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Bowie: Sound and Vision (documentary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slow Burn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:English edition of Deleuze's Cinema 1 (most recent).jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:English edition of Deleuze's Cinema 1 (most recent).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Bowie discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Stay Together (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doctor Who Magazine Winter Special 1984 front cover.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Doctor Who Magazine Winter Special 1984 front cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who Magazine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Finish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Bowie BBC Sessions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.illustrated-db-discography.nl/BBC.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Crimeface. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Please don't carry water for Stott. Drmies (talk) 04:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies. Thank you for the message, and the update to the page you mention. Sorry I haven’t got back to you sooner, but I didn’t notice your message at first, not until I got a second one from someone else on what I believe a related issue, if not the same, depending upon interpretation. Anyhow, it boils down to the tone of voice I sometimes can fall into. Having got these messages, I have now become conscious of this and fully accept it can be sub-par. With regard to the specific issue you came to me with. It was because of this page I got into looking at Stott’s work. Prior to this, for instance, I have done a lot of work on Bowie’s music videos and music films, going out and getting them all, and reading all the big discography books. I also did early Doctor Who strips in comics, and it took me a year to find them all either online or buying the things on auction on Ebay! I am now working on Nina Simone, and have spent some weeks getting all the albums, and getting all the biographies, etc, as well as making tentative first steps on the pages. I suppose what I am saying is I tend to target a subject, and do the best I can to improve pages and add them around that subject. I cannot tell you why I landed on a particular subject, the reasons are different. But I know I get a bit fixated, that I get so into a subject it can take over my world, and I think that is coming across poorly in some of the stuff I write. I am working on a Stott page that will be my last, just waiting for some media to arrive, so I’ll be very critical of myself before I post. And going forward with my work on Nina Simone albums, I’ll keep your advice in mind. Thank you once again for contacting me about this issue, and how my work is coming across. It is quite embarrassing to be honest, so I’ll be doing everything I can to avoid this kind of feedback in the future. McrPhilosophy (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic tone[edit]

Hello there. Seeing the work you've just done to Gifted & Black; I must ask you to follow Wikipedia's guidelines regarding tone. There are many examples in the work you've just done (and I freely admit work was needed) that are simply not okay: "something was fishy", "and so on", "what we do learn" etc. I will be watching. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 12:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred. Thank you for the message, and for calling this out. You are of course right, and looking back at the page the additions I had made were sub-par with respect to tone. The excuse I *would* offer is that I was only just beginning to work on this page, when life intervened and I left things poorly done. However, upon noticing your comment, I found I had another one from someone else on a different subject, but which in essence is the point you have identified. So this is definitely something I need to watch out for. Thank you for calling it to my attention. For now, I have just quickly sorted the issues you mentioned with the page, and I hope to get back to this in the near future. And if you do notice any slip-ups I make as you are doing your rounds, I would of course be grateful if you let me know. McrPhilosophy (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" 😉 I appreciate your response and efforts to address the concern. I have given it a quick look but am quite blurry eyed from staring at code for hours so will try again after some sleep. I did noticed you're using single quote-marks (apostrophes) to quote sources though; our manual of style (which is vast and comprehensive) stipulates double quote-marks should be used for those. Have a good day/night. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 14:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krishna Stott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishna Stott, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Stott (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bowie Cracked Actor film titles composite.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bowie Cracked Actor film titles composite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]