User talk:Mbilalhsp

This is Mbilalhsp's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debra Youngblood (March 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debra Youngblood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mbilalhsp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Self reference[edit]

Hi. Thanks for trying to improve verifiability and citations on Wikipedia. Unfortunately Wikipedia can't be used to reference itself, so edits like this one https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Encyclopaedia_of_Chess_Openings&diff=prev&oldid=1145817995&diffmode=source can't be accepted. There is a brief explanation of this at WP:USERGENERATED explaining why user-generated content such as Wikipedia itself can't be used to cite claims in Wikipedia. Quale (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Textual variants in the Book of Genesis seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very Sorry dear that was a mistake I will try my best to avoid mistakes Mbilalhsp (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chess at the 2007 Asian Indoor Games. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP adding references to other Wikipedia articles. As explained above by Quale, Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a reference; see WP:UGC. Any edit you make to add Wikipedia as a reference just wastes time for other editors who need to revert your additions. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, That article was not inappropriate because I write this article with proper information on the topic. Mbilalhsp (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The site has been blacklisted for its persistent use as refspam. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not get why? Mbilalhsp (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you and others keep using it for spam. Simple. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]