User talk:Mbalulescu

Welcome!

Hello, Mbalulescu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alhutch 03:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Sorry about the whole block thing. It was collateral damage from someone else in your school being blocked.

File copyright problem with File:Christ_Church_Waltham_Mass_Western_Facade.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Christ_Church_Waltham_Mass_Western_Facade.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Christ Church[edit]

Thanks again for your outstanding work on Christ Episcopal Church (Waltham, Massachusetts). I wish that every historic site in the U.S. had an advocate as enthusiastic as you are. :-)

I'd like to try to bring the article up to "Good Article" status. A lot of the citations in the article are for a book cited as The History of Christ Church Parish in Waltham, Waltham, Mass: Christ Church, 1999. I can't find any other references to this book on the net. Is it self-published by the church? That could be problematic, since it means the book is more of a primary source than a secondary source. Wikipedia articles should rely on secondary sources wherever possible. Tim Pierce (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]