User talk:Maybeparaphrased

About Ashok Kumar

I had made the recent edit because the reference link (number 7) redirected to a completely out of context advertisement. You could check that out for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.244.116 (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

note

I thought I mentioned that I removed what did not belong. The article was mostly advertisement. I'll be clearer from now on.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.151.105.8 (talk) 06:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Trillo

Hi! I am actually currently moving the said contents into another page: List of awards and nominations received by Dennis Trillo. I am improving Dennis Trillo's page at the moment that's why major edits were made. Anyway, I'll remember next time to leave an explanation whenever I remove some contents. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBdemigod (talk • contribs) 02:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

About Kataragamam Temple

DEAR MAYBEPARAPHRASED,

I AM IN VERY UPSET MOOD AFTER I HAVE READ THESE PAGE.BECAUSE IT CONTAINS LOT OF FALSE THINGS.I HAVE A PROOF AND EVIDENCE.I M TAMIL PERSON IN SRI LANKA.I M A TAMIL LANGUAGE INTERESTER AND TRYING TO PROMOTE MY LANGUAGE WITH TRUE EVIDENCE.HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT LORD MURUGAN IS A SINHALA GOD AND THAT TEMPLE OWNS FOR YOU ALL GUYS.EVEN DID YOU KNOW WHAT ARE THE 7 MAIN TEMPLE OF LORD MURUGAN.I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS DONT KNOW.ALWAYS TRYING TO DESTROY OTHER RELIGIOUS HISTORIES.AS SOON ON FUTURE I WILL PUT A CASE FOR ABOUT THIS TEMPLE AND WE WILL GET BACK.YOU DO NO ANY CULTURAL ACTIVITIES DONE BY HINDUS IN TEMPLE.I HOPE YOU REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE.

REGARDS, SRI LANKA TAMILAR SANGAM — Preceding unsigned comment added by SRI LANKA TAMILAR SANGAM (talk • contribs) 07:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I like to write about all cultures. You should write an article about the ones you know. Do not try to delete the other article by blanking it. Write an article about what you know about. Let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 07:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

unsolicited suggestions/advice

Hello! Just a suggestion on your AfD nominations: try speedy or PROD first. In the case of Andrew Dutkewych, which will be kept, you could have saved a whole lot of time by just PRODDING it. I see another nomination that you made for a page six minutes after the page was created. This is really bad form, as you need to give the page some time to grow so it can be properly assessed, and you also need to not WP:BITE the new editors. The general procedure for pages lacking notability is Speedy Delete (if possible), PROD, then AFD. AfD's, because of the time they take, are usually reserved for last resort deletions.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Sounds a lot like sour grapes to me. I do not need or want any advice from you @HappyValleyEditor ! Looks like you have been acting out since the AFD nomination. Oh, and it appears that several people agree with me already. Did you really go so far as to sock to file a bogus SPI against one of the delete editors? That is really out there. Stay off my talk page with your foolishness. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

You need to WP:AGF and not insult and accuse other editors,as it can be considered a personal attack. I have nothing to do with whatever it is you are talking about. I was merely politely alerting you to the fact that your nominations are hasty, and how to improve them.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I told you in the post earlier "to stay off my talk page" yet you have posted here again. Your false accusations will get you nowhere. I will be reporting your harassment of me just because I happened to AFD an article you worked on. Also you posted on my talk page after I told you to stop. Please stop bothering me. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 01:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

In use tag

I have put the in use tag on the page Robert Adrian, yet you continue to edit and to remove good references. Please respect the tag and cease stalking my edits. This article a few hours old and is under development and you removing multiple GOOD references does not help. There is more text that is going to be attached to those references. You were also advised at ANI to stay away, so please do so. Pinging @Drmies:...... HappyValleyEditor (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

You are posting on my talk page a third time now after I told you to stop. Newyorkbrad I was working on an article removing extraneous references sine the article was hard to read. What I removed was citation clutter as per WP:CITEKILL I was working on an edit to cure more cute kill for seven minutes and when I saved it you tag thing appeared. I made one other quick edit to correct a small error. It did not cause an edit conflict. No harm no foul. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 05:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

I was not advised at ANI to stay away. And from what for heaven sakes? That is wrong. YOU and fouette were warned to steer clear of each other. I only agreed with an editor there against your position. You are on a rampage against me now. You are disrupting AFDs now by commenting on the editors not the content which is against policy and is disruption , what you think of them, making false claims against me and trying to influence by all of your disruption. Also you wrote in a snarky edit suMary that I was warned at any to not post on your talkpage. That is false. I am preparing diffs and will be making a formal complaint soon. Stay off my talk page. You have violated that three times already. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 05:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

• We do not have any other way to communicate other than through administrators, which is not ideal. Tonight I made a new article Robert Adrian with 25+ references, and also added 15 references and 25 or so publications to the article you had marked for Afd Tony Scherman. I have nothing at all against you. It would just be nice if you a) did better research before AFD'ing notable artists, as that is the second one I have rescued that was clearly notable, and b) left pages alone when they are marked in use and c) did not delte good references that I have spent time finding. Your edits are actually pretty good, aside from the above. Do you think we could get long on that basis? I think that these things are super reasonable requests for working together. What's the point of all the strife? Have a nice evening. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Now this is your fourth violation of posting on my talk page after I told you to stop. I have no desire to communicate with you. Stop seeking me out. This difficult list is getting longer and longer. You are accusing me again with a false claim that I did not observe before. You are wrong there. Drop that before stick. You apparently do not understand. the WP:CITEKILL Read that over the part about it making the article le difficult to read. Drop that stick. I explained the in use thing above. Drop that stick. You interrupted my active editing session by slamming that up there. I finished my work since you wanted no one else to eat there. There were no edit conflicts, but I stopped anyways After finish one my last edit. Drop that stick. Your most serious problem is that you are causing disruption at multiple AFD s by commenting on editors or contributors instead of the content in the article. I do not know why you are doing that exactly. Disruption at multiple AFD s is a serious sanction able offense that could get you blocked.

Stay off my talk page last warning. If you feel the need to Communicate to me figure something else out. Make a thread on your talk page if you like. If I feel like looking there from time to time I will. No promises. I hate having my time wasted. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 06:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Newyorkbrad Drmies Mackensen have told user happy valley editor repeated to stay off my talk page. Now since the first time I told him to stop. he has continued to post on my talk page now FOUR times. Please make him stop from posting on my talk page. I have another list of diffs and the outline of how he is going to multiple AFD s and continuing to cause disruption by commenting over and over about the editors or contributor instead of the content which is causing disruption. Thank you. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 07:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

as soon as finish the list of diffs. I will post them for someone else s evaluation. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 07:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

NOAA Photo Library

that afd

Please don't try deal with the editor yourself. It's being handled. DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks DGG. I shall leave it to you or others. Maybeparaphrased (talk) 04:54, 20 July 2016

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Lemongirl942. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Surbana International Consultants Pte Ltd, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

More rubbish. Are you not busy enough attacking and stalking, and following Zpeopleheart around now?

I do not want you to post here at my talk page any longer. I will not have my time wasted by your foolishness and chicanery. Go away. Do not pass go. Drop the stick. BE GONE!   Maybeparaphrased (talk) 03:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Black Kite (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

NOAA Photo Library

unblock appeal area

placeholder for text

, ,,, ,

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maybeparaphrased. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)