User talk:Mason1999

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mason1999! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm -Alabama-. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Elephantidae—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. -Alabama- (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will now be attempting to substantiate that edit. If afterwards you are still intent on reverting, you are free to do so but I'd appreciate it if you could at least counter my reasoning. Mason1999 (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elephantidae. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Porterjoh (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karl-Heinz Rummenigge, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Iraq. Dirkbb (talk) 19:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I sincerely do not give a single fuck about you or any of your admin butbuddies. None of you guys' messages here will be read for even an attosecond, just FYI. Have a nice day! Mason1999 (talk) 23:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Paul Pogba, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that claim? Mason1999 (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jota (footballer, born 1999). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primates[edit]

I have reverted your edit to Primate to follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style. In particular, per MOS:BOLDLEAD, only the first occurrence of the title uses bold text, not later appearances in the article. Certes (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Germans. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop warring and familiarise yourself with WP:BRD. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Physeteroidea. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fabrizio Romano[edit]

Left the same message with the other user, but while Fabrizio Romano is very reliable, his whole thing is reporting things before they happen. Therefore, he's not a very good source for verifying things that have happened, and that's the standard for Wikipedia. We always wait for the club announcement, not when things are "done deal" or "here we go". Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]