User talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2020
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nomination of Wikimedia Foundation v. WordLogic Corporation et al for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikimedia Foundation v. WordLogic Corporation et al is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia Foundation v. WordLogic Corporation et al until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‑ Iridescent 14:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
You should comment and !vote on the deletion
Every vote counts (sort of). We are all equal here. And some are more equal than others. If you don't edit much, there can be an expected discount factor. But different perspectives illuminate the discussion, IMO. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Talk redirects
Hola Marco Aurelio. He marcado para borrar dos redirecciones a páginas de discusión (Talk:SS Majestic (1889) and Talk:SS Teutonic), pero un administrador insiste en revertir, ¿por qué no las borra? No sirven para nada, no redirigen a los artículos, que esas sí se deben mantener. --Mark Gasoline (talk) 22:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hola Mark Gasoline. No edito mucho aquí pero creo que las redirecciones que mencionas no cumplen con los criterios de borrado rápido. Si en realidad estás interesado en que esas redirecciones se borren deberías llevarlas a Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion para que se discuta su borrado. Como te digo no edito mucho por aquí y por ende no estoy familiarizado con todos los procesos de la Wikipedia en inglés. Lo que sí te recomendaría es que no insistieses en marcarlas para borrado rápido porque si ya dos administradores te han dicho que no procede, probablemente tengan razón, e insistir podría derivar en que te bloqueasen, lo cual es del todo evitable. Echa un vistazo a Wikipedia:Redirect. Un saludo, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Vale, gracias. --Mark Gasoline (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |