User talk:MarcGarver/Archive 51
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 45 | ← | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 |
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
Furniture Makers entry
I’m new to this - what was my epic failure? Redpen2 (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- You should read WP:NPOV first. The text you added included this: "In education the Company has created a development programme to ensure that talent is nurtured at all levels to meet the needs of the industry." This is not neutral, in fact it reads like an advert. It is also not cited to an independent reliable source. More appropriate wording would be to write something like "the Company offers services including development programmes, consultancy and welfare for industry participants" (and supported by a reference to something other than their own website). MarcGarver (talk) 17:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
Aleisha Rose copyedits
Hi! First of all, thanks for your much more thorough copyedit of the page above, which I briefly touched a little while ago. You made a number of great changes, a few of which I felt silly for not having caught first!
One question: I had changed "resides in Brisbane. Queensland" to "resides in Brisbane, Queensland," and your edit reverted this change. I'm a long-time copyeditor but still pretty new to WP:MOS; in my experience outside of Wikipedia, a comma would be correct there, but I may have missed something particular to either en.wiki or Australian name places. Wanted to check in with you whether it was an error or not, rather than just change it back!
Thanks for your great contributions to open knowledge here, and happy editing :-D Chiselinccc (talk) 11:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Chiselinccc:, your edit is correct, mine is an error. There was an edit conflict when I tried to save mine as I was changing it at the same time as you. I thought I had checked everything to make sure I didn't revert your edit with mine in resolving the conflict but missed the comma. Thanks for spotting it! MarcGarver (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh geez, that makes sense! Thanks for clarifying and sorry if it was dumb to ask about this- I've bumped up against edit conflicts before and so far I've just kind of backed out of the room and not pushed my changes, so I didn't even know what happened if you "publish" at that point. I'm trying to get myself to move to a desktop environment, where I can deal with stuff like that more effectively, but my lazy instinct is still winning sometimes to stay on mobile!
- Again, thanks for all you do- I see rockstar contributors like you and feel motivated to keep learning, as overwhelming as the MOS etc can feel sometimes. Cheers! Chiselinccc (talk) 14:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you are editing via the desktop view, when an edit conflict occurs each section of text (anything separated by white space I think) is shown with your version on one side, and the conflicting version on the other side of the screen. You can then check which version of each section you want to save using radio buttons. It's much easier to use than the mobile view. MarcGarver (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm used to side by side diffs from git version control in programming, so looks like I should power up and jump on in. Take care! Chiselinccc (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you are editing via the desktop view, when an edit conflict occurs each section of text (anything separated by white space I think) is shown with your version on one side, and the conflicting version on the other side of the screen. You can then check which version of each section you want to save using radio buttons. It's much easier to use than the mobile view. MarcGarver (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
MarcGarver, I realise that you Satanists think Wiki is your personal site
MarcGarver, I realise that you Satanists think Wiki is your personal sitefo rpushing your praise of him and no doubt he is delighted how gullible you are but out in hte real worl dthe Bible is truth and Jesus himself referred to THE FLOOD so I think you need to get off your petty high horse and leave my correction in place! I suggest you buy a good KJV Study Bible and learn soem real truth and not rely on what you were braainswashed with during the Planet of \apes years.
A|ND |FI HARLES DARWIN HIMSELF - ever heard of him - proved that the Flood was a real worldwide catastrophe whose effects are still visible all round the world .
|I'm reediting the article in question to state that all gas, oil and coal is from organic matter washed off Earth during the 371 days of The Flood and the resulting crustal alterations 200 years later during the height of he \Ice Age.
I suggest you get some reael education and throw out all your PLanet of apes videos: they is just garbage. 92.40.41.205 (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you can provide a reliable source where a scientist in a peer reviewed journal says that "The Flood" is a real historical event and that all the things like the fossil record that stretches back 4 billion years are wrong, then I will be on your side. As no such source exists then your edit will keep being reverted. MarcGarver (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue