User talk:Manvir Malik
September 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Kj cheetham. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tarkhan (Punjab) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to remove caste racial comment that show superiority of caste no caste is first or second
Your recent editing history at Tarkhan (Punjab) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Ok sir but i provide reliable sources
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Polytechnic College. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC) you can check i am providing you reliable sources offical website of collegeManvir Malik (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Manvir Malik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
o hello why i have been blocked without any reason before blocking check my account and who is punjabier
Decline reason:
You are blocked for sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Manvir Malik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
how you can say i have accounts called punjabier ,unblock request you
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Manvir Malik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am extremely sorry if i did any thing wrong on Wikipedia, in future i will never cause any disruption on Wikipedia I promise also i will try my best to contribute or to improve articles on Wikipedia also i will give donations to Wikipedia for a such a interesting methods for writing beautiful articles
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Manvir Malik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i understand what i have done i will add material into the article's by discussion on talk page i am new to Wikipedia i have learnt now about vandalism i m understand now kindly unblock if i have add any material by discussing on Wikipedia than you can again block me permanently .
Decline reason:
It is not clear from your unblock request if you are admitting to the sockpuppetry. You say "i understand what i have done", so seem to be admitting to your violations. If so, please make your request with your original account, and be much more specific. Yamla (talk) 13:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'll also note that Punjabier has been so abusive, they are considered de facto banned by the community under WP:3X. Therefore, you'll need to follow WP:UNBAN in order to resume editing. --Yamla (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
You can block me for particular article if you think i am punjabier trust me i do not know about punjabier Manvir Malik (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
One thing more i can make new account even you never know about but i know i am honest i dont want to creat new accounts sorryy English is not fluent please unblock i ll discuss before adding any material and you can block me from editing tarkhan articles . Manvir Malik (talk) 14:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Manvir Malik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
One thing more i can make new account even you never know about but i know i am honest i dont want to creat new accounts sorryy English is not fluent please unblock i ll discuss before adding any material and you can block me from editing tarkhan articles
Decline reason:
Decline as Yamla said above; plus I don't think you have the competency required to edit English Wikipedia. only (talk) 20:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Manvir Malik (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
love u all my brothers and sorry if i have ever hurt you my friends Wikipedia just for fun not for hate enjoy life, life is very short dont add any material on Wikipedia that hurts feeling of others always add positive materials remove negativity from every articles because negativity spreading hate to world this is my last request to you my friends if you feel i am than unblock otherwise thanks all of you. Manvir Malik (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
i have requested yesterday kindly unblocked my account Manvir Malik (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)