User talk:Malfacteur

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Malfacteur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pomingalarna (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Nick-Cave-And-The-Bad-Seeds-More-News-From-Nowhere.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nick-Cave-And-The-Bad-Seeds-More-News-From-Nowhere.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Doherty article[edit]

I notice you claim that you like discussing edits on the talk page. So why do you keep taking unilateral action, brushing aside the comments on the talk page, on the Pete Doherty article? One users opinion dose not automatically over ride another’s.--Prophesy (talk) 22:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just getting tired of users who add nonrelevant information to articles and then try to start edit wars. That wasn't the first time (and surely will not have been the last time). Malfacteur (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The way it seems from here is that you started the edit war with unilateral action, totally bypassing the talk page element of wiki editing. It may be better to consult people in the future before you decide what should or should be in an article off your own back.--Prophesy (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted gossip from a biographical article. That's what wikipedians are supposed to do. Malfacteur (talk) 01:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don't Go Back to the One You Love[edit]

The article Don't Go Back to the One You Love has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dontgobacktotheoneyoulove.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dontgobacktotheoneyoulove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doherty released from prison.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doherty released from prison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]