User talk:Majid50

Nomination of Majid Manteghi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majid Manteghi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Manteghi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Majid Manteghi has been reverted.
Your edit here to Majid Manteghi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.angelfire.com/md2/discover/APSIH.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

What?

Please explain what purpose this edit served and why you felt it necessary to link from total active reflection coefficient to TARC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

• The technical term TARC is used for MIMO application and is a good measure of the antenna system performance. We have introduced it in 2003 as Total Active Reflection Coefficient (TARC) and people know it as TARC. That was the main reason to link this page to TARC. I didn't see that you have already added it as "Total active reflection coefficient".

You have not answered my question: what earthly purpose is served by writing TARC, ie. creating a link to the disambiguation page. Do you really think that people reading the article need to know that TARC has other meanings? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't hurt to know that TARC is not the exclusive abbreviation for Total Active Reflection Coefficient.

Assistant professors

Hi, I'm responding to your comments on my talk page. The most important criterion for Wikipedia is notability. It's not enough for someone to "exist", he or she has to be notable in the field. This means that the person should be talked about or quoted in reliable sources such as respected newspapers and online news sources, or be listed in awards sites. You did a good job of referencing Manteghi's papers, but the only real source that describes his work is his resume at Virginia Tech. Those other assistant professors probably have more reliable sources than that.

You don't have to worry about deleting the page; when the AFD discussion is complete, an administrator will delete it. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Total active reflection coefficient

Hi again. I don't know if you are Magid Manteghi himself, but you should know that Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. This particular article assumes scientific knowledge on the part of the reader, and primarily presents the point of view of Professor Manteghi's research, both of which are not in keeping with Wikipedia policy. When you write a Wikipedia article, it should introduce the subject in easy language and develop each point using a variety of references from different sources. If TARC is a new finding, then you must wait until it is accepted by the broader community, and then source it. I'm afraid that the article as it stands now is another candidate for articles for deletion. Yoninah (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Reconfigurable intelligent surface moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Reconfigurable intelligent surface, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Reconfigurable intelligent surface

Hello, Majid50. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reconfigurable intelligent surface, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Reconfigurable intelligent surface

Hello, Majid50. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Reconfigurable intelligent surface".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)