An editor has asked for a deletion review of Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Jreferee t/c 19:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
For your contribution to My RfA, which passed with 8000 Supports, 2 Neutrals and no opposes.
The standards and dedication of the English Wikipeidan Administrators is excellent and I am privileged to stand among them. Thankyou for putting you trust in me, I'll not see it abused. And now, I will dance naked around a fire. Party at my place! Cheers! Dfrg.msc 08:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[1] is a CFD. I am not asking you for a "keep" vote rather do you know of what are the keep and/or notable criteria? There are criteria for what is notable in an article, but how about categories?
Learning ABOUT wikipedia in this case is just as important or more important that keep or delete on this category. Archtransit 15:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I am a new user to Wikipedia and have been working on turning a stub on free machining into an article. I saw that you are part of the Wikiproject metalworking and would appreciate if you could provide some feedback on the article.
So just for my personal knowledge, do this and this not grant one notability? isaid 03:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, but there is no proof the user who created the article was in fact the subject. isaid 03:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, I guess I just would've considered two published books carried by bookstores, a surely credible newspaper article and one with flimsy credibility, and numerous mentions elsewhere would qualify as notabiliy. isaid 04:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Archive ν! Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was a success, and I look forward to getting started! Hiberniantears 18:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I, Mailer Diablo, ascertain that the image qualifies under the United States Copyright law's fair use for the following reasons :
I'm not sure, but are you sure you can use US Copyright Fair Use for a photo from a Singaporean Company, published in Singapore? ĞavinŤing 14:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, would you mind if I recreated this as a redirect to Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas? Or would you mind doing it? Seems to me that the term itself is worth having, just to save searchers a little time. Thanks! GlassCobra 05:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Looks great. Thanks! GlassCobra 18:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! Thank you for your help in my RfA. It hammered home a few things I need to keep in mind while admining and passed with a final tally of 40/0/4; two people forgot to vote in time, leaving me short of that exquisite number, but I'll just have to fudge the next vote about me. Adminship feels slightly august but not particularily exalted, so I shall endeavour to consider it a toolkit and make sincere efforts to know what I'm doing before using it. Oh, and it was good to see that there can still be mutual respect between a card-carrying deletionist and a die-hard inclusionist. (I had the momentary urge to shout "FOOLS! YOU KNOW NOT WHOM YOU HAVE UNLEASHED! MWAHAHAHAHA!" but remembered I already swore restraint in closing AfDs in the fields where I'm active. :-) ) *bows* --Kizor 14:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Khee-rist. And now I got your username. Carry on. --Kizor 19:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Shoemoney. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article on August 14, 2006, you might want to participate in the deletion review.--- Jreferee t/c 15:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
My dear Wikipedian Mailer diablo,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.
Hi, you previously closed an AfD (delete) on the above article. It has been rewritten, but I still think it is AfD. I have re-nomd it, but I am uncertain how to set up the page vis-a-vis the previous discussion. Can you please have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Ghayyour Ahmed and see if the appearance is OK? Thanks, WWGB 12:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
List of Fatal Highway Accidents in the Florida Keys[edit]
Hi there -- I accidentally recreated this page while trying to recover the information from it. Is there any way you could re-delete it? I'd greatly appreciate it. Also, is there any way to recover the information that was there before the deletion? Thanks. JKBrooks85 13:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much. JKBrooks85 14:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successful. I'll do my best to justify the confidence you've placed in me! Dppowell 23:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Mailer diablo,
I thought that it was unfortunate that you deleted the "Bible and Reincarnation Article". I agree that it could have used more sources, but the topic is noteworthy and legitimate. I don't know if you had an axe to grind with reincarnation, but censorship should not enter into the equation. Humans do reincarnate, and reincarnation has a place in biblical history, just look at the works of the Roman-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus--he specifically notes that the Pharisee sect of Jews, at the time of Christ, believed in the reincarnation of good souls (War of the Jews). When humans are ready for it, they begin to remember. This does not detract from the special status of Jesus Christ as the Son of God; He is, and He also refers to reincarnation if you open your mind and look closely; pray to know the answer. God bless. --Jesse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdcap (talk • contribs) 21:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Naruto_geography. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Subdolous 15:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
On 2 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dave Teo, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi, is there anything wrong with the abovementioned article/hook? It has adequate sources to cover the entire article properly (15 of them, and no less than the frontpage of the country's only broadsheet). - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 21:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Mailer diablo, the concern I have with the article is that it is a biographical article about a person famous for one news event, BLP specifically states that we should try not to have articles on people who are famous because of one news story. Whilst I haven't done anything drastic regarding the article (as I do agree it's well sourced), the guy hasn't even appeared in court yet and casts him in a very negative way, so from a BLP perspective, I don't agree it's good to have on the main page. Hope that helps to explain. Ryan Postlethwaite 21:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Just to add to that, I see you're the article creator, and I appologise for not informing you I had taken it off the main page - that would have been the courteous thing to do. Ryan Postlethwaite 21:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
There is a less than warm reception at the Admin noticeboard for the Dave Teo DYK listing. Also see this. I thought that you would like to know. -- Jreferee t/c 21:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Modla has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718at 02:23, 11/4/2007
Thanks! Thank you for voicing your opinion in my RfA, which passed with 54 supports, 2 opposes and 3 neutrals. Thanks for your support, I really appreciate it. I hope to exceed expectations, If you have any advice please feel free to let me know. Thanks again!. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤
Hey man! I wanted to drop you a line to say thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any backup or second opinions! GlassCobra 01:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my RfA, it closed today with a final tally of 39 supports, 1 oppose and 1 neutral. As always, if you ever see me doing anything which would cause you to regret giving me your support, let me know. henrik•talk 18:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with you! (Esprit15d 21:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC))
Remember, remember, the fifth of November? Thank you to everyone who participated in my Request for adminship, which was successful at 50/5/0 on November 5th, 2007. It became, as you may know, rather contentious toward the end (though fortunately no gunpowder was involved), and I appreciate the work of other Wikipedians to keep it focused. --Thespian 02:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
political epithets are gone, but ethnic and religious epithets are OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.207.222.132 (talk) 16:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Those probably should go too, if only because they are the target of people with negative agendas. Steve Dufour 14:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to take care of this. I still feel that WP policy calls for deletion of this kind of trivia, but I see that I was in the distinct minority on this one. Wishing you well. Steve Dufour 14:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
