User talk:Madjewelvisor

I use Wikipedia a lot to read & add a little. I expect the pages to show accurate information & many thankfully do, if the information is a little brief at times on more obscure subjects & too long-winded and hard to navigate on wider subjects.

The Rastmouse page should similarly give accurate info, a person should not use Wikipedia and then decide for themselves if what they are reading is true, as one user unreasonably demands we do in publishing known errors: it is a trusted encyclopedia (to the majority) & most users do not question the details shown as being anything other than correct.

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Also take note of comments left at Talk:Rastamouse#user_Rubiscous_.26_Episodes_data. Rubiscous (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It appears tiresome user Rubiscous has nothing better to do than disrupt. I thought neutralising the article would stop his nonsense, but no. Madjewelvisor (talk) 20:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should discuss the issues with the article at Talk:Rastamouse—and focus on the article and not other editors. Frankly, the discussion there is so vague that I can't tell, except in a general sense, what's the issue in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Rubiscous contributions for the year & see what this person actually adds to Wikipedia... Madjewelvisor (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything that warrants administrative concern. I certainly don't see anything specific enough to warrant the report you filed at AN/I.

I ask again, are there any issues with the article Rastamouse that you have concerns about? Please provide specific information. You may provide a link to a specific edit (a "diff"), but do not just make a blanket characterization of all edits by a given editor being problematic. —C.Fred (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I make no apology for your perception that my net contribution to Wikipedia may have verged on the side of Deletionism over Inclusionism, even if true. Rubiscous (talk) 02:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rubiscous: please stop harrassing me & Rastamouse[edit]

I have explained this before, you intend to disrupt & publish incorrect information & think that's ok. it's not. you have caused upset on this page already with another user. I suggest you leave Rastamouse alone & go find a forum where your views will be better dealt with & faster

I see you have been warned TWICE BEFORE in your user page history

Re a comment you left on my talk page[edit]

Hello, Madjewelvisor. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 21:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rastamouse-ting for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Chzz ► 15:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]