User talk:MadeInBasildon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MadeInBasildon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 17:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadeInBasildon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It appears that you have blocked me for updating an incorrect link?!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 21:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadeInBasildon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I feel I should not have been blocked as I was updating a link address. This is one of many that are out of date that link to the same site. I will not update any more out of date links.

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for updating a link. Please review the block notice carefully before making another request, and in that request address your violation of the username policy, conflict of interest, and possibly paid editing. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadeInBasildon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. If you look at the link I updated you'll see that the old one doesn't go anywhere. The reason I know this is out of date is because it is my website. I don't add it to advertise, just to share free information. My website is free and I don't make any money from it. History is for everyone and should be free wherever possible. I am happy to remove the links to my website if needed. James

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time.Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. To be unblocked:

  • You must propose a new username that meets the username policy Please post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked.
  • You must confirm that this account is used by one individual only.
  • You must agree not to promote any subject on Wikipedia. Please read User:deepfriedokra/promo for information on content to avoid.
  • You must agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy.
(Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID).
  • You will need to discuss content and sourcing rather than editing any article with which you have a real world connection.
  • You must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future. No promotional edits will be permitted.
 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MadeInBasildon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think this is a misunderstanding, I was just keeping the site up-to-date rather than advertising, but I can see why this has happened *I am the only person that has access to this account. *I will not promote any subject on Wikipedia and will abide by the Terms of Use. *I will stick to correcting and adding sources to the website, rather than mass editing. *I only tend to edit subjects around football and local history.

Accept reason:

per renamed and discussion with blocking admin. Welcome back --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Please choose a not-official user name. Something that represents you as an individual and not a cog in your company's machinery. Something that does not appear to be a role account --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(REnamed-- have chosen 'MadeInBasildon' as I am proud of where I am from and it matches a tattoo I have.}

I'm not part of any company, I'm currently unemployed.

James}}

globally renamed BasildonHistory to MadeInBasildon[edit]

globally renamed BasildonHistory to MadeInBasildon --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf: OK to unblock? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: OK. -- Alexf(talk) 17:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Billericay Town record win[edit]

Hello. The source you use does not show it was a record. It just lists the results from that season. Please could you provide a source that notes this was the club's record win. Thanks, Number 57 17:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, You're right. Thank you for that. I'll see what I can do.

James

New page advice[edit]

Hello, could someone advise me on how I create a new page please? It must be over 10 years since I created a brand new page on here, and another 10 before that when I first created a few.

Thanks

James

A really good guide is WP:YFA. There is also the WP:CHEATSHEET for formatting, and WP:REFB for references. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest finding a page similar to the one you want to create and use that as a template. This is generally how I start election articles or biographies. Cheers, Number 57 18:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both, I have created a page for judgment.

James MadeInBasildon (talk) 18:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asanteni Charles has been accepted[edit]

Asanteni Charles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Number 57 11:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asanteni Charles for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asanteni Charles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asanteni Charles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]