User talk:MSENDER007
MSENDER007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Administrators and reader, please contain your negative remarks. When I set out to write articles on franchise films like The Howling, Timecop, etc I set out to make best article possible; however, I was naive and didn't fully understand the rules and regulations. I would get overly upset when another editor would delete the work that I put countless hours on without a simple suggestion or helpful comment. One editor would constantly harsh my intelligence and browbeat me whenever I made a mistake instead of telling how to fix my error, which further caused more stress, which effected my judgment. Please note that I do not mean to point this out to ridicule the other editor and would like to leave his/her username anonymous – I hope he/she can be as considerate by not commenting on this post. I do admit that I made my share mistakes and take full responsibility for them such as creating “sock puppet” when I wasn’t allowed to change my username from MSENDER007 to Averagejoe260 the proper way. Please understand that I created other usernames so I could continue to write/edit articles in a manner to improve as an editor and not be ridiculed in the process. During my time of being banned, I have witnessed hours of writing being deleted within seconds such as the Kickboxer (franchise). I also admit that I intentionally/unintentionally plagiarized when writing the episode synopsis on Timecop (TV Series) article. I also understand now why IMDB is not accurate source to use on Wikipedia. I would like to be allowed to edit once more with this username; however, do not expect it to happen overnight. I am simply asking for one last chance to show administrators and other editors that I really do want to make amended for my behavior. Lastly, I have written few Wikipedia articles as well as corrections on Microsoft word that are completely cited that I would like to post once given the chance and wouldn’t mind sharing to someone to show them how my writing has improved. I apologize for my actions Wikipedia and hope you give me the chance to make things right.
Decline reason:
The problem is twofold. First, you've committed copyright violations. You note that some of your copyright violations were intentional and some were unintentional. Both are problematic. You deliberately chose to put the entire Wikipedia project in legal jeopardy with your intentional copyright violations. And with your unintentional violations, we cannot trust you to be unblocked. We need to be absolutely sure you'll never violate copyright again. As to your account, Averagejoe260, you say you set up this account because you couldn't change your username. But this is not true. You set up that account after this account was blocked. And that's not the only other account you set up. A combination of these things makes it impossible for me to seriously consider unblocking you at this time. Your best bet would be to apply under WP:SO which requires zero edits (and absolutely no more accounts) for at least six months. Even then, you'd need to convince us we can trust you'll never again violate copyright, either deliberately or accidentally. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you Yamla, I'll do that.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ed McBain's 87th Precinct franchise, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I hope you can come back and be an editor again[edit]
While you did make some pretty big mistakes it was definitely, nice that you were very enthusiastic about franchises and worked a lot on minor ones which didn't have articles. I hope you know that there will not be any ill feelings if you come back when the six months have passed, it's better if you do that instead of making a new account that will be blocked as a sock.★Trekker (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words, ★Trekker and no ill feelings. MSENDER007 (talk) 25 January 2019.
Orphaned non-free image File:Timecop (tv series).jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Timecop (tv series).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ed McBain's 87th Precinct franchise, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ed McBain's 87th Precinct franchise[edit]
Hello, MSENDER007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ed McBain's 87th Precinct franchise".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Susmuffin Talk 08:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
MSENDER007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear administration and editors: I am requesting the unblocking of my account under WP:SO. It has been two years since I was blocked from Wikipedia due the use of stock puppet accounts, and copyright infringement. I understand the importance of my actions and how it could affect Wikipedia. If my account is restored, I would strive to be more detailed in my writings of Wikipedia articles, use the sandbox to edit my articles before publishing and ask for the advice of other editors when I do not completely understand how to cite or post a picture in the articles I am writing. I do not have an ill feeling towards any of the other editors who blocked me. I understand that they made their decision to protect the dignity of Wikipedia. Furthermore, I do not plan on writing any articles on Wikipedia in the near future, I just want to be able to resolve this matter once and for all. *What is copyright? Copyright is the right that the producer of a work has been granted to prevent others from copying it without permission. *Under what circumstances can copyrighted material be used on Wikipedia? Copyrighted material should only be used in article if the material is cited and linked to copyrighted material. *How is it potentially harmful to use material copyrighted elsewhere? The use of materials that infringe the copyrights others could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. *What is edit warring? What will you do instead? According to Wikipedia, “edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute.” Furthermore, the site states a person should instead “seek help in addressing the issue than to engage in edit warring. When disagreement becomes apparent, one, both, or all participants should cease warring and discuss the issue on the associated talk page, or seek help at appropriate venues.” *What are reliable sources? Why are they are important? (redacted copyvio) Reliable sources are important because Wikipedia articles need to be based on reliable, published, sources. According to the site, “if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.” *What must users do when adding content? Content protocols states “[w]hen adding content and creating new articles, an encyclopedic style with a formal tone is important. Instead of essay-like, argumentative, or opinionated writing, Wikipedia articles should have a straightforward, just-the-facts style. The goal of a Wikipedia article is to create a comprehensive and neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge about a topic. […] Ideally, all information should be cited and verifiable by reliable sources.” This will be my last request. Thank you for your time. MSENDER007 (talk) 7:12pm, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In light of the perhaps inadvertent copyvio mentioned here, I cannot unblock at this time. It is clear user is unwilling or unable to avoid copyvios. This is apart from the issue of socking which I am not addressing now. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'd like to ask a few questions to assess your readiness to return.
- What is copyright? Under what circumstances can copyrighted material be used on Wikipedia? How is it potentially harmful to use material copyrighted elsewhere?
- What is edit warring? What will you do instead?
- What are reliable sources? Why are they are important? What must users do when adding content?
Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- What is copyright?
Copyright is the right that the producer of a work has been granted to prevent others from copying it without permission.
- Under what circumstances can copyrighted material be used on Wikipedia?
Copyrighted material should only be used in article if the material is cited and linked to copyrighted material.
- How is it potentially harmful to use material copyrighted elsewhere?
The use of materials that infringe the copyrights others could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia.
- What is edit warring? What will you do instead?
According to Wikipedia, “edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute.” Furthermore, the site states a person should instead “seek help in addressing the issue than to engage in edit warring. When disagreement becomes apparent, one, both, or all participants should cease warring and discuss the issue on the associated talk page, or seek help at appropriate venues.”
- What are reliable sources?
(redacted)
- Why are they are important?
Reliable sources are important because Wikipedia articles need to be "based on reliable, published, sources." According to the site, “if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.”
- What must users do when adding content?
Content protocols states “[w]hen adding content and creating new articles, an encyclopedic style with a formal tone is important. Instead of essay-like, argumentative, or opinionated writing, Wikipedia articles should have a straightforward, just-the-facts style. The goal of a Wikipedia article is to create a comprehensive and neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge about a topic. […] Ideally, all information should be cited and verifiable by reliable sources.” MSENDER007 (talk) 5:36 p.m 25 January 2019
- OK, two issues here:
- This editor can only be unblocked by a checkuser, and the current unblock request completely ignores the extensive socking.
- "
A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, etc. based on strong evidence such as scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books; trade or professional articles or books; magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established newspapers.
" is copy-pasted from this site. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- (Responding to NinjaRobotPirate) Given the copyright violation and plagiarism during the attempt to unblock, I very strongly suggest we decline this unblock request. That's even without taking into account the previous extensive sockpuppetry. I'm deeply, deeply disappointed here. Committing a copyright violation while attempting to have a block for copyright violations (and other issues)? Hard to see a path forward from this. --Yamla (talk) 00:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- I've restored the blanked coversation here as they have come into -unblock requesting an unblock, and this should take place on-wiki. Pinging Ponyo as the blocking admin so she is aware. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
To reviewing admin[edit]
To the reviewing administrator, please note that MSENDER007 committed a copyright violation earlier today. You can see the discussion at this version of this talk page. MSENDER007, please do not blank this message. It forms an important part of your unblock request. Your recent copyright violations, given that you've been blocked for copyright violations and for sockpuppetry, is relevant here. --Yamla (talk) 01:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- He can't. Looking through the talk page history, MSENDER007 has been repeatedly removing declined unblock requests and blanking any message that comments on the unblock process. I've revoked his talk page access – for now, at least. At a minimum, we need a few hours to discuss this without having the discussion repeatedly blanked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- This edit added the copyright violation, and it was copy-pasted from this site. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.