User talk:Luciano di Martino

Giulio Clovio[edit]

The Encyclopedia entries are tertiary sources. You are btw deleting perfectly good secondary sources with no reason other than to advance your claim. You should read the discussion on the talkpage to see this has been gone over at length. You are in violation of WP:3RR (3 revert rule); you are going against WP:Consensus and another editor showing the exact same editing behavior as you was just given a warning at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --AnnekeBart (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported the edit warring [1] --AnnekeBart (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for edit warring[edit]

Hello Luciano. Please see WP:AN3#User:Luciano di Martino reported by User:AnnekeBart (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that nationalist edit-warring about famous people who seem to have both Croatian and Italian connections is not new on Wikipedia. The Arbitration Committee has handled similar cases in the past. If you continue your program of 'Italianization' you will most likely be warned under WP:ARBMAC, which covers nationalist editing on topics related to the Balkans. This could lead to a permanent ban from your making any edits in this topic area. If you hope to be here long term, please listen to feedback and work with others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Giulio Clovio[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Luciano di Martino reported by User:AnnekeBart (Result: 72h, ARBMAC).

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

EdJohnston (talk) 23:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luciano di Martino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is apparent harassment combined with censorship. I'd like to file complaint against this administrator. Please, give me instructions how to file the complaint and where.--Luciano di Martino (talk) 8:39 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you may only use this template to request unblocking. You should read WP:UNBLOCK, as it describes how to do so. If you'd like to file complaints, you may do that after your block is lifted or expires. TN X Man 01:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Martino[edit]

Salve signor Martino.

Ho deciso di scriverle questo commento per farle sentire la vicinanza di idee e impressioni di medesimo contenuto.

Lasci perdere ogni commento alla voce: Giulio Clovio

" ...matematici esperti di storia e studenti universitari sbarbatelli " non meritano alcuna risposta. La voce è palesemente POV. Numerosi testi universitari riportano quanto antecedentemente scritto.

Saluti. --Davide41 (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Luciano_di_Martino[edit]

I'm also notifying this account talk page for the record. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]