User talk:LuK3/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 10

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 00:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I apologize, I meant to put a summary. What I was going to write was 1 800 GET THIN is a marketing company that does not accept insurance. Furthermore this is off topic. The insurance investigation does not need to be part of this page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmcphail23 (talkcontribs) 17:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

LUKE I am sorry that I added a complement for danjel101 in the article brotherband. But after i added my complement I realised articles are not where you put complements so I'm sorry but will you let this incident go. Wtfiswithyourhead (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry I'm not sure how to start a new thread. I have a problem : I just received a notification about someone on this IP ADRESS having vandalized a page of a school in my city. Now I haven't an account and didn't know that it was possible for me to edit pages on Wikipedia. So I'm confused, firstly is this possible that another person with acess to this IP ADRESS having done it? Or is it people who only have acess to this particular device? I'm quite a newbie on tech so please help me out. Will it be a permanent stain on my IP record? Amd what exactly is an IP address? The device I use is not private so could this be a warning to the ip a dress in general or me in particular? 92.97.16.133 (talk) 21:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)a confused person

Hello, and I'm sorry if this is a little confusing. I think the issue here is that your IP address is a shared IP. A shared IP means that multiple people share one IP address. In your case, the IP is registered to Emirates Telecommunications Corporation. The warning I gave to the IP address may not apply to you because you didn't make that edit. The only way you can stop getting irrelevant warnings is to create an account. I hope this helps you, if you need more help please reply back. -- Luke (Talk) 23:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, and can I use your pic of the Towers of Light

LuK3, Thanks for the tip about signatures! I really admire your giant pic of the light towers in NYC! I'd really be delighted if you wouldn't mind me using it with all the cool useful links on my own user:page. Please let me know if this is okay.

Thanks again, WroteOddly (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You can use it, as the photo is in the public domain. -- Luke (Talk) 13:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion nomination of Underx

I've had to decline your speedy deletion nomination of Underx. Even with the one sentence that the article had when you nominated it for speedy deletion, it still had enough context to determine what the subject of the article was- in this case, it said that the subject is an internet relay chat network. This makes the A1 speedy deletion criterion not applicable in this case, so I had to decline the nomination.--Slon02 (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that. -- Luke (Talk) 16:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Five

Stop by for a tasty glass of wiki-iced tea at the Teahouse, today!

Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

  • Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteers who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
  • More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
  • Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
  • New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
  • Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 08:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 23:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 23:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

its not a bloody personal attack! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 03alpe01 (talkcontribs) 11:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi LuK3, thanks for helping out at WP:RPP, a quick tip when noting (as a non-admin) that a request has already been fulfilled by an admin we generally use the "Already ... by" templates {{RFPP|ad}}, {{RFPP|ap}}, & {{RFPP|au}}. If you do use them then there is no need to use the nao template. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I usually use both templates, depending on the length of the protection. -- Luke (Talk) 13:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources

What Sources do I need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Im a mob guy (talkcontribs) 17:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

All articles need reliable, third-party sources so the information in the article is verifiable. You can find some examples of reliable sources here. If you have more questions, you can ask me or go to the Teahouse, where other experienced editors can help you further. -- Luke (Talk) 17:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I'll get to it. I'll remove the un-reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Im a mob guy (talkcontribs) 17:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2451 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA. Although you abstained, I appreciate that you nonetheless took an interest in my candidacy by posting a question for me to answer, so as to give people a better idea of what to expect from me if I were an admin. Take care. =) Kurtis (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry it didn't succeed. I wish you luck next time around. :) -- Luke (Talk) 20:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Joke

Dude, seriously, the whole thing was just a joke. Did you even read what was on EC's userpage to prompt it? It's nothing more than harmless fun, yet I've just seen someone s-protect the page because of it, Jeez! Are you guys seriously gonna waste someone's time investigating 5 obviously connected socks that were obviously having a laugh? 82.132.139.238 (talk) 21:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't tolerate sockpuppets and vandalism. -- Luke (Talk) 21:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I've semi-protected your page for 6 hours. Ping me or RFPP if you want it removed. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 22:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Songs with the word smoke in them

Hello LuK3. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Songs with the word smoke in them, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 17:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[Moved to userpage]

Thanks, and sorry about beating you. :) -- Luke (Talk) 15:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 06:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 06:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Help

Do explain how, I vandalized on your page. It was of good intentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heavyopenz (talkcontribs) 13:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I deemed it unconstructive and reverted it. -- Luke (Talk) 13:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

It was a form of appreciation from me. How can that be constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heavyopenz (talkcontribs) 14:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[Moved to userpage]

Thanks, I appreciate it! -- Luke (Talk) 14:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Luke, regarding this revert. The IP is correct, Evans is a convicted rapist. Maybe it isn't appropriate to include it where and how they did, but it certainly wasn't vandalism. Regards, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

His conviction was already stated in the 3rd paragraph of the lead. I don't think there is a need to add his conviction to the lead section according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Biographies of living persons. -- Luke (Talk) 14:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
I agree, and was about the revert in good faith. The edit was certainly in good faith and if they were to be warned it should certainly shoudn't have been for vandalism. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
I've reformatted the previous warning I gave the editor. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Luke (Talk) 15:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Looks good (don't worry about TB I'll stalk the page). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 15:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Editing Jon Jones page

Vandalism? I was just adjusting the flags of his opponents. Matyushenko doesn't have a flag, so I put the Belarus one for him. Also André Gusmão is Brazilian, and not american, as indicates the flag on this page. What's wrong about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdu rollo (talkcontribs) 15:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello Kdu, it looks like you added some HTML class attributes to the article, which I removed. You can re-add the Belarus flag. Sorry about that. -- Luke (Talk) 15:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Give people more than 15 seconds to figure out how wiki works

We have a new company and need to create a wikipage. I am new to this before I can even figure out what I'm doing you come in and delete everything. Are you going to spend the time creating our wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SOARSolutions (talkcontribs) 17:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

For keeping my user page clean. --Jprg1966 (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You're quite welcome :). -- Luke (Talk) 14:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

TY

Thank you! For help preventing an anonymous user to vandalize 123people wiki (again). Much appreciated!

--Remco Janssen (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Glad to help :). -- Luke (Talk) 15:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Six

Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

  • Teahouse serves over 700 new editors in six months on Wikipedia! Since February 27, 741 new editors have participated at the Teahouse. The Q&A board and the guest intro pages are more active than ever.
A lovely little teahouse nestled in Germany from Wiki Loves Monuments
  • Automatic invites are doing the trick: 50% more new editors visiting each week. Ever since HostBot's automated invite trial phase began we've seen a boost in new editor participation. Automating a baseline set of invitations also allows Teahouse hosts to focus on serving hot cups of help to guests, instead of spending countless hours inviting.
  • Guests to the Teahouse continue to edit more & interact more with other community members than non-Teahouse guests according to six month metrics. Teahouse guests make more than twice the article edits and edit more talk pages than other new editors.
  • New host process implemented which encourages anyone to get started as a Teahouse host in a few easy steps. Stop by the hosts page and become a Teahouse host today!
  • Host lounge renovations nearing completion. Working closely with Teahouse hosts, we've made some major renovations to the Teahouse Host Lounge - the main hangout and resource space for hosts. Learn more about the improvements here.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 22:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 22:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 12 September 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT 16:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please put it back the way I had it.

Good evening LuK3,

I will choose to stay anonymous for this conversation. I know you meant well when you undid my changes but I spent a long time finding current info on Todd Witteles and I thought appropriate to show the screen shot I took from the FBI website and the current info on this person. This is a dangerous person and I thought it totally 100% appropriate to post what I did. Many people I know personally have been scammed and have had their lives ruined by this individual and now he is a fugitive. I thought I would edit his wiki page because I had a good conscience and thought it was the right thing to do to further protect the public and families that have been hurt by the actions of this criminal. I do not think the wiki page should be pushing him out as some sort of hero although I did leave the correct current info about him on the page about his poker career. So if you can , I am sincerely requesting that you please put it back the way it was. Thanks. Anonymous 108.85.230.11 (talk) 02:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

The addition to Todd Witteles is a gross violation of biographies of living persons and specifically BLP: persons accused of a crime. Your edit also had no references to support your claim. See verifiablity and reliables sources. If LuK3 had not removed it, I or many others would have. Jim1138 (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Sepp

Hi i'm mr folkstone and sepp blatter is corrupt, so it is constructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.71.21 (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your edit does not provide reliable sources and is not in a neutral point of view. -- Luke (Talk) 20:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio on Abu Yahya al-Libi?

I see several months back you added the {{Non-free}} tag at the Abu Yahya al-Libi page. Could you elaborate on the talk page what the problem is? Thanks. --Jprg1966 (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Probably because editors copied and pasted from news sources after his death. It seems like it was taken care of, the tag can be removed now. Hope I cleared it up. -- Luke (Talk) 21:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

HELP!!

LuK3, I need your help. I am an inexperienced user here in Wikipedia, and I could SERIOUSLY use a mentor. Can you help me? Thanks, The Triple M — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Triple M (talkcontribs) 02:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Sure, what do you need help with? I'm happy to a answer any question you have. -- Luke (Talk) 02:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2012 Oklahoma wildfires

Thanks for creating 2012 Oklahoma wildfires, LuK3!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

reviewed orphan

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2451 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

Page Curation newsletter

Hey LuK3. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page.

Kevlar (talk) 04:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 00:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Kai Forbath edits

Hi LuK3,

I was not the one to originally deface Kai's page, I caught the errors and was going through trying to correct the problem. There were many inappropriate subjects and comments that I found rude and inaccurate.

Thank you for helping clean up his page. If you catch any other edits can you please help me in reporting the page to be cleaned up.

Thank you, Nicole — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.53.174.5 (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey Nicole, I'm sorry, that warning was my fault. I had around 10 tabs open to warn the IPs who vandalized the article. You can remove the warning if you would like. Again, I'm sorry. Thank you for your anti-vandalism fighting. -- Luke (Talk) 23:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 00:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

When you started joining Wikipedia

Wikipedia is very fun to edit and save. When did you start editing Wikipedia and when did you join Wikipedia? Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey Ashbeckjonathan! I joined Wikipedia in June 2008, however I started actively editing around June 2011. It's a great place to get your place where you're comfortable in. :) -- Luke (Talk) 18:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for the disrupting the flag of Indonesia, it's my first time and I still am learning the rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callen mitchell (talkcontribs) 01:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for the disrupting the flag of Indonesia, it's my first time and I still am learning the rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callen mitchell (talkcontribs) 01:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

This is not a newsletter

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 office hours

Hey all :). Just a quick note to say we'll be holding office hours in #wikimedia-office at 21:30 UTC this Thursday (the 29th) to show everyone the additional tools we're thinking of working on. All attendence and feedback is appreciated :). Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2451 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Hinsdale Central High school

Please stop reverting my change

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.16.217 (talk) 01:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, please do not add information without reliable sources, or else they will be reverted. In addition, please read WP:FANCRUFT and WP:VANDTYPES. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Hinsdale Central High school

Please stop reverting my edits to this page, plese talk if you have a reason they should be taken down. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortman69 (talkcontribs) 01:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Your edits have no reliable sources that verify that information you added. In addition, your edits appear to appeal to a small group of readers. Please look over Wikipedia's policy on vandalism, as well. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

RfA

While it didn't turn out like we hoped, there are a few things to be learned here. First, even those that opposed, praised your work and efforts, only feeling you need more experiences in other areas. While this means a delay in receiving the admin bit, my confidence in you in still complete and absolute. The opposing votes were mainly constructive and sincere, so I don't think anyone could hold any ill-will against anyone who felt a little more time is needed. I want to say thank you to everyone who participated, regardless of their !vote. There is no doubt in my mind that you will make an excellent admin, even if it isn't this week. As I've told you privately, I am still willing and wanting to work with you on the issues they raised. Everyone there discovered what I already knew, that you are a tremendous asset at Wikipedia. Lastly, thank you for allowing me the honor of nominating you, and I would be happy to do it again at a future date if you so chose. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 22:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings LuK3. I wanted to check in and say hello. I think Dennis has been pretty thorough with his summary; it's all good stuff, and I mostly agree. Dennis, I know you mean well, and so do I. I had a thought when I read the opening sentence; "it didn't turn out like we hoped". I would not advise anyone to ever place hope in the outcome of an RfA. I'm not saying I haven't done it, I'm thinking this is why it can leave you emotionally exhausted. The bit isn't nearly worth an investment of hope. IMO My76Strat (talk) 04:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Everyone "hopes" they get the bit at RfA, otherwise, you wouldn't put yourself through the stress of starting the process. Disappointment is part of life and we don't get what we want every time, but we learn from the experience and it makes us stronger. We both did hope he would get the bit, for Wikipedia's sake as well as his own personal growth and life experience. The hope hasn't changed, only the time line. Never be afraid of wanting something or hoping. There is always something to be learned, even when you don't get it. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 12:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I know it happens Dennis, I've done it. But it's a mistake! It ain't worth the emotional investment. The best approach is to be willing to serve, and as willing to not serve, Heck, if a hopeful is not careful around here, someone will twist that to mean "you want it to bad" and slam you from that angle. If I'm going to share something I've learned, then I'm going to share it the way I was taught. So I've given my opinion, cheers. My76Strat (talk) 13:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi there,

First of all, I gladly noticed that you made some changes according to more reliable facts and the purposes of Wikipedia. As I said before, I am the responsible for Mr. Joao Carlos Pereira and I really appreciate your job!

I am really sorry to be doing this, but I still do not agree on the fact that you are mentioning a name of another coach in Joao Carlos Pereira`s page. If you take a look at other coaches sites, they do not mention other coaches (competitors). It is very obvious and clear to me...

I will be glad to put an end to this and stop changing things, but PLEASE stop mentioning another coach.

Thank you LuK3!

Compliments Jose Marinho — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.150.224 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

  • My two cents: this person, who seems to be some sort of agent/publicist for the manager in question, does not want any other coach to be mentioned in Mr.Pereira's page, even though in this case Pereira and João Resende Alves' career are intimately connected at Servette FC: ALVES started the season, was fired and replaced by PEREIRA, who was also sacked with ALVES taking his place - the user in question is having none of that, and i have already messaged him telling him his approach is 200% wrong.

Attentively, from Portugal - --AL (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Delivered 00:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Help with Page

Hey,

I know you're good at this, i am editing the page for TV personality FABRIZIO GOLDSTEIN and am having trouble organizing the page, i'm not super computer savvy. Can you help?

thanks,

-Joshua Rosen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabrizio Goldstein (talkcontribs) 00:24, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I fixed the wikitable for the "Filmography" and "Television" section. All I did was add the table end "|}" part of the wikitable. You can take a look at a quick summary of wikitables here. If you need any more help, let me know. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much!

the only other thing i can't figure out is how to remove the File:Frameless alt from my picture box. I'm sure it's easy, i'm just not proficient at this. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabrizio Goldstein (talkcontribs) 15:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

I fixed it. It looked like you added the |thumb image parameter, thus creating the border and the frameless error. If you need any more help, I'll be happy to help you :). -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too

Thanks for the kinds words. I was sorry to see that you did not pass your recent RfA (you'll be a fine admin in time) and I hope you have a great holiday season as well! AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 03:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

In due time I hope it'll come, thanks :). -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Darkwind's talk page.
Message added 21:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Darkwind (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Dima Yakovlev Law nominated for DYK

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2012-2013 Northern Ireland protests, LuK3!

Wikipedia editor Gareth E Kegg just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great start. Can't believe this page hasn't been created yet.

To reply, leave a comment on Gareth E Kegg's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, LuK3. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added by Theopolisme at 00:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy anniversary!

Happy 4 years and 7 months anniversary! Alright, this is rather pathetic...I just couldn't help but bring it up after looking at your userpage :P Theopolisme (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Should of just waited for my birthday on Wednesday, I love brownies! :) -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Virginia tech 2011 shooting subject.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Virginia tech 2011 shooting subject.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

AFT5 newsletter

Hey all; another newsletter.

  • If you're not already aware, a Request for Comment on the future of the Article Feedback Tool on the English-language Wikipedia is open; any and all comments, regardless of opinion and perspective, are welcome.
  • Our final round of hand-coding is complete, and the results can be found here; thanks to everyone who took part!
  • We've made test deployments to the German and French-language projects; if you are aware of any other projects that might like to test out or use the tool, please let me know :).
  • Developers continue to work on the upgraded version of the feedback page that was discussed during our last office hours session, with a prototype ready for you to play around with in a few weeks.

That's all for now! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Federal law of Russian Federation no. 272-FZ of 2012-12-28

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: ACC access

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mlpearc's talk page. Mlpearc (powwow) 18:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, can't find your message anywhere. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mlpearc's talk page. Mlpearc (powwow) 20:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)