User talk:Lowkeyvision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Talkback

Hello, Lowkeyvision. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nthep.
Message added 21:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NtheP (talk) 21:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) I've actually asked FoCusandLeArN on her/his talk page for more information , Lowkeyvision, because I think your submission is fine, and I don't see any evidence of original research on your part (which was the decline reason given). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While circumstances are beyond my control, my actions are. I will not go back on my word to Sitush. However, I appreciate your advocation. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
I found the reviewers response unsatisfactory, and find the underlying article to be useful and the topic to be notable. As such, I've moved the article into mainspace and done some copyediting on it. I told the reviewer that if she/her really doesn't think it's notable to take the matter to AfD. Thanks for the new article! One thing you might want to do is see if there are other articles you could add a mention of this too so that it's not an orphan. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nathans Hotdog.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Nathans Hotdog.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is self defense a crime? (Lowkeyvision (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
Nobody is attacking you, so there is no "self-defense" involved. I see you have already been blocked twice this month - please do not give me cause to make it three times. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both times is due to Sitush lobbying admins to ban me. And you wonder why I say what I say? (Lowkeyvision (talk) 16:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
If anyone should block or ban you, it will only be because of *your* behaviour and nobody else's - I strongly recommend you wise up and listen to good advice here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What do you have say about [[1]] or [[2]]? When senior editors bully newer users, they can call on admins to ban on them. NOTHING will happen to him for these things. There is clear bias and the system is broke. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
You have been told before not to take things out of context, acting duplicitously as you have in linking those two diffs. Do you want me to find the diffs for that also? Did you take on board anything that was said here by a bunch of experienced contributors? - Sitush (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sitush can you find me one time I have cursed at you? I can find many times where you have cursed out, insulted, berated and created hostile situations for new contributors. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
There are many ways to attack people without using swear words, and there are many ways to be disruptive. And, Lowkeyvision, you have clearly been very disruptive of late - and though it is unfortunate when other react angrily to you, I can understand why it happened. What I suggest now is that you drop the tit-for-tat argument, and try to start again - it really would be a shame if your time at Wikipedia came to an early end, but you really do need to follow our collegial approach to content creation and to discussion. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I'd also suggest you take a little time to cool down and relax. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) My point was, I retracted the "piss off" comment before anyone else replied, Lkv knows this and has now shown that diff on at least three occasions without acknowledging the retraction and apology and despite being told that they should do so. It is duplicitous behaviour. Furthermore, if it wasn't for the fact that they keep blanking this page, there is much evidence that I and others have both tried to work with Lkv as well as warnings them etc. The combination of blanking plus Lkv's tendency to take half-a-dozen or more edits per message or article statement makes tracking this stuff very messy. - Sitush (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw that the "piss off" comment was quickly retracted too. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying my best to distance from Sitush and took Writ Keepers suggestion and made the offer to not edit any other pages except 1 to end things. If you check [[3]] you can see that Qwyrxian encourages me to edit articles, but I refuse because I had told Sitush to leave me alone on this 1 page and I would stop editing all other pages he edits on(infact all other pages because I was that annoyed).

Insulting someone and then striking it out can be seen as a intelligent/underhanded way to get your message across while skirting scrutiny. It is not "read in between the lines" but "read behind the line" tactic. If I had posted the same message, I assure there would have been no mercy for me.

I am going to take your advice Boing! said Zebedee and retire for the rest of the day. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 17:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Firstly, you don't get to tell another editor they can't edit a specific page, sorry. And secondly, yes you could assume that "Insulting someone and then striking it out can be seen as a intelligent/underhanded way to get your message across while skirting scrutiny" - but that would be forgetting our WP:AGF policy. I have encountered Sitush on many occasions, and I think the motivation you ascribe to him is very unlikely - I think it is far more likely that he genuinely regretted those words and struck them. As for "no mercy", I can't speak for anyone else, but I would personally assume good faith equally with you if I saw you make a rash comment and then strike it. Anyway, I hope what is left of the weekend goes well for you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely, and removed talk page access. I'd ask any admin considering an unblock to email me; there are some details that I'd prefer to deal with off wiki. But the general rationale behind the block is trolling, long-term disruptive behavior, POV pushing, and essentially nothing but a battelground behavior that is making others miserable and harming the encyclopedia. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halloween Costume Cyclops.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Halloween Costume Cyclops.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyclops Halloween costume.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cyclops Halloween costume.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rayban Avaitors.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rayban Avaitors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lowkeyvision&oldid=581574355"