User talk:Lord-of-Midnight-18

Welcome![edit]

Hi Lord-of-Midnight-18! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! TJMSmith (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you TJMSmith. I'll be sure to look at it and use it in the future. It will take a while to get used everything on Wikipedia but I hope to learn more as time goes on.

Happy editing :) Lord-of-Midnight-18 (talk) 03:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Lord-of-Midnight-18[reply]

A lengthy welcome[edit]

Hi Lord-of-Midnight-18. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 03:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Thanks for adding a source over at Doomscrolling - much of that article just uses bare urls with <ref> tags wrapped around them, so thank you for adding a reference properly formatted.

Just wanted to let you know for the future - in the source you added, I noticed you used included |language=en. This parameter is actually only used for sources not in English - since this is English Wikipedia, it's kind of a given that the sources, unless otherwise noted, are in English. If the source is in English, you don't have to give the language, in short.

It's not a big problem - it doesn't actually display in the References section like you'd see on non-English sources (e.g., "1. Blah Blah Blah (in French/Spanish/Mandalorian)"), but it does get removed if it just reads |language=en, |language=en-GB, |language=en-US, or |language=en-AUS, and the like.

Just thought I'd pop in to say. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)

I sometimes edit Wikipedia to try to keep my mind off things (in this case it was the 2021 storming of the US Capitol). I really like your username. Are you a fan of Good Omens?

Lord-of-Midnight-18 (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Lord-of-Midnight-18[reply]

Nomination of Family Security Act for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family Security Act is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Security Act until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

// Timothy :: talk 02:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Black Excellence[edit]

Hello, Lord-of-Midnight-18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Excellence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Excellence[edit]

Hello, Lord-of-Midnight-18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Excellence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]