User talk:Looper5920/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)[edit]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mwss274trans.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mwss274trans.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGatalk 02:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New updating implementation for USMC Portal[edit]

Hi there. See you have been dropping in for a few edits on a semi-regular basis. Hope all is well and your are settled in an safe.

As my time on Wikipedia has been limited from time to time; and as Bahamut0013, who has been helping keep the USMC Portal updated, will be away for awhile, I've set up a "semi-automatic" updating scheme (based on the USAF portal). See the Portal talk page and the coordination page (at top of page) for details. Feel free to make some choices, at your leisure, for posting and create them in advance.

Love to hear your comments. — ERcheck (talk) 21:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving[edit]

Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving! Haven't seen you around much lately, I hope all is well.
Might as well mention it now: I'll be back in Iraq soon after the new year, at Al Asad Airbase. I hope to still be able to make some contributions while overseas, but you know that would be tenuous at best. Anyway, my best to you and yours. bahamut0013♠♣ 02:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing the same — a Happy Thanksgiving... and peace and safety. — ERcheck (talk) 12:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1STBN5THMARINES-2.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1STBN5THMARINES-2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1STTANKBN.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1STTANKBN.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CebLogo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CebLogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2-7battalionlogo.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2-7battalionlogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A004.jpg[edit]

I want to feature Image:A004.jpg on the USMC portal sometime this summer, but I need a little more info than you gave in the upload form. The caption you gave was: "USMC convoys staging prior to going north into Portrush in March of 2003"... now, Portrush is a town in Ireland. I'm guessing that it's Kuwait somewhere, can you tell me exactly where? What unit you were with when you took it? I would appreciate it. bahamut0013♠♣ 02:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Sherrod[edit]

Created Robert Sherrod. Thought you might be interested. Be happy if you could make improvements. — ERcheck (talk) 03:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)[edit]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new project[edit]

I'm planning to take on a project for the rest of the month, and I was wondering if you'd like to join me. I'm planning on replacing the award ribbons on various US military biography and unit pages with the new vector images. There is a .SVG file available for all US awards and most authorized foreign awards (see the templates: interservice, Army, DoN, USAF, USCG, and foreign). I'll also take the opportunity to replace ribbon rack images (where multiple awards are lumped into a single image) and create a ribbon rack table on articles that have a simple list (see example ).
Are you interested in coordinating? If you are not, do you have any advice for me (I'm sure you've created many more biographies than I)? bahamut0013♠♣ 19:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:7th Division Iraqi Army.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:7th Division Iraqi Army.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vmaq1 insig.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vmaq1 insig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 18:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)[edit]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leland Lou Diamond[edit]

Did you know Lou Diamond or have any one in your family who knew him?? I was just curious because he is my great great uncle Lou. and I just wanted to know more about him because he died way before i was born. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.152.202 (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question on the U.S. Air Commandos[edit]

Hello Looper, I had correspondence with a Mr or Ms GlubbDrubb querying that there should be references to the article but I responded that there were rather obvious references on the piece mentioned. I had no idea what he was talking about, and he said that you had done some sort of review on it. To reprint the conversation- [edit] 1st Air Commando Group G'Day (or night) Glubbdrubb. I'm rather intrigued by your message about citing sources, as I will paste below, the article has several sources listed [edit] Notes ^ p.176 Busch, Bryan Cooper Bunker Hill to Bastogne: Elite Forces and American Society 2006 Brasseys ^ http://www.explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=958 ^ p.2627 Various authors Marshall Cavendish Encyclopedia of World War II 1985 ^ Sikorsky R-4 history ^ a b Masters, John The Road Past Mandalay Michael Joseph (1961) ^ Yancey, Madonna United States Air Force Air Commandos 2000 Turner Publishing. p.6 ^ Yancey, Madonna United States Air Force Air Commandos 2000 Turner Publishing. p.20 ^ http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,897935,00.html I have noticed on many Wikipedia articles a message at the top saying an article needs sources, yet they are referenced at the bottom of the page. At first I thought that initially the message was put on before there were any sources, with someone later adding them. Here I've quite a few. Could you explain to help my understanding of a good Wikipedia article please?Foofbun (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I must be honest and say that my entire basis for what I said was the review Looper5920 (talk) had given it. Citations and referencing is not my strong :point so I would suggest that you :take it up with Looper5920 or with one of the other members of the military task :force. I hope you resolve this issue so we can "upgrade" this article's grading. --Glubbdrubb (talk) 19:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

So, as I'm FAIRLY new or should I say not used to to Wikipedia quality, could you please elaborate why an article with many references needs references please? Thank youFoofbun (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Want to Help[edit]

Hello,

My grandfather is Lt. Col. Carl P. Writer who flew with the VMF-223 in WWII in the Pacific. He was shot down once and got back up in the air to fight. I have many photos, log books, etc. and he is still alive. I would like to add the information he has and photos if possible to Wikipedia. Don't really know what I am doing but I would think it an honor to get his information in there. Thanks for any information or guidance.

Jeffreywriter (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Police Department[edit]

I apologize, but I had to undo your edit that removed the brutality section. IMO, it may have been poorly worded and speculative, but I believe the editor is owed the opportunity to provide sources. I tagged it up pretty good and will be checking back on it for a week, then I plan to kill it. Again, sorry, especially since my gut agrees with you.

Nevermind then.

Vulture19 (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speculation = Does not belong. I reverted your last edits.--Looper5920 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I didn't think the original editor would have cited them, then I could have deleted it. But, I wanted to know the truth anyway. It's true. So to avoid an edit war, if I re-include the contested section and cite one of the incidents (from the New York Times), but leave the rest, are you going to revert it?

Vulture19 (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

It's good to see that you are back and editing actively again. ERcheck and I have been doing some big work on the USMC portal, you should take a look: Portal:United States Marine Corps/navigation. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see the new articles you written. Note — for VMR-152, you had a typo - said they flew the KC130J. I think you meant A model - I made that change. — ERcheck (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the 2/3 afghanistan picture...[edit]

that picture was taken at camp blessing...if you did not know... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.1.95 (talk) 05:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)[edit]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for edit to VMF-142 re Christopher George[edit]

Howdy Just wanted to say thanks for your edits re Christopher George. I am working on the military biographical history of him and using Wikipedia to document many of my findings. I am also adding him to places/pages as appropriate. Thanks again, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Googleplex732 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Shore Party Battalion[edit]

A tag has been placed on 3rd Shore Party Battalion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MCAS Santa Barbara[edit]

Suggestions for a new article — MCAS Santa Barbara.[1] — ERcheck (talk) 03:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yeah it has been on my to do list. I'll get one started tonight. Thanks for the kick in the butt.--Looper5920 (talk) 04:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks so much. Article looks great — and it links to many articles, so a good one to create. I moved the military infobox down as it was causing havoc in the rendering of sections when I viewed just now. — ERcheck (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Overhead MCAS Santa Barbara in April of 1944.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Overhead MCAS Santa Barbara in April of 1944.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
March 15, 2009
Time: 3pm
Location: Drexel University

RSVP

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local Italian restaurant.
This has been an automatic delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marine Corps Air Station Santa Barbara[edit]

Updated DYK query On March 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marine Corps Air Station Santa Barbara, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 12:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on this DYK. Glad you got to see it on the Main page, and with the top spot with image. I nominated it when I saw it and hoped it would make it with the nice vintage picture. 98.200.138.70 (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

. — ERcheck (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...didn't even realize you had nominated it until last night when they tagged it. A good incentive to start doing better articles again.--Looper5920 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It had a nice hook right in the intro, and that reference was right there. Those are the two items that make it simple to nominate and get selected. — ERcheck (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need a hand[edit]

I recently expanded Marine Security Guard. However, the best reference, GlobalSecurity.org, is somewhat out of date. It lists only Companies A through G, when the official website lists contacts for H and I as well with no further data other than their existance. It also refers to former Soviet nations in fairly recent terms. I was wondering if you had a more up-to-date reference?? I'm sure some of the other data is quite outdated as well. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bio upgrades[edit]

I made some improvement to the Melvin Maas article. The Charles Tatum article needs a lot more work. Won't have time to get to it now; not as easy to get info. — ERcheck (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did somethings to Bolt in your sandbox. Also took the liberty of sectioning your sandbox how I do mine when working on multiple article -- superheading for each - makes it easier to work on each article. — ERcheck (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another photo question[edit]

Can you tell me where File:VMM-162 Osprey on the tarmac in Iraq on April 1-2008.JPG was taken? I'm trying to compile a list of photos taken at Al Asad Airbase. Thanks! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was taken at Basrah International Airport.--Looper5920 (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:060528-M-3312R-RAID3low.jpg[edit]

File:060528-M-3312R-RAID3low.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Marines raid Fallujah garage.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Marines raid Fallujah garage.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:060616 LIMA 11.jpg is now available as Commons:File:L company 3rd Battalion 3rd Marines search house.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Henry Rollins in Iraq with USO tour.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Henry Rollins in Iraq with USO tour.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Overhead Manatuto 11 Oct 09.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Overhead Manatuto 11 Oct 09.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:C-1A Trader at Willow Grove.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Grumman C-1 taking off at Willow Grove.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)[edit]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VMF-113 Photos[edit]

Hello, My dad served with VMF-113 during the Okinawa Campaign on Ie Shima and I have several photos of him that i would like to submit to the Wikipedia page on VMF-113, but do not know how to go about it. Can you help? Dabikes (talk) 21:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bolt[edit]

Yes. Good candidate. How about...

...that LtCol. John F. Bolt, Korean War Navy Cross recipient, remains the only U.S. Marine Corps jet aircraft flying ace?

— ERcheck (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll nominate if you'd like....or do you want to do it? — ERcheck (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are a better man than I...Throw it in the ring/--Looper5920 (talk) 01:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. — ERcheck (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Hopefully it makes the cut--Looper5920 (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Images I uploaded for you to use as appropriate:

— ERcheck (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:1st AD insignia.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1st AD insignia.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John F. Bolt[edit]

Updated DYK query On April 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John F. Bolt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Aerial Nav School[edit]

In the article on Marine Aerial Navigator insignia it indicates that MANS was closed, and that is my understanding as well. The article on Marine Aviation Training Support Group 22 seems to have the best account of the school, but does not mention it. I see you are a main contributor to the latter. Rather than make the alteration, I'm referring it to you. LilHelpa (talk) 18:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are your concerns?[edit]

I found little that was salvageable from the original article, but I did use some of the material to start the new writing...sort of like yeast to make it rise (lol). I had a fair offline start on the new article that I pasted in. And I just got tired of looking at an online mess.

If you take a look, you will see little notes hinting at future development. I do have several books to refer to, and I have my personal experience to help guide me.

Take a look, looper. If you still have some concerns, let me know. You may aim me in some good directions.

Georgejdorner (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your participation in shaping the Forward air control article would be appreciated. Please see its talk page.

Georgejdorner (talk) 01:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mumia[edit]

What are your specific concerns with my wording? Also note that I made several other changes to hyphenation later in the article; it's never a good idea to revert wholesale. DS (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The hyphens will live, God forbid they got reverted. It is also not a good idea to make wholesale changes to the introduction of an article that is known to be controversial without discussing it first. Your wording completely changed the introduction and is a weasel attempt to portray Jamal's innocence in the introduction for the article of the man he was convicted of killing. --Looper5920 (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite correct in that I should have discussed it first. Not all criminals protest their innocence. This is a controversial case, though, and we should mention that. Did he kill Faulkner? I don't know. You don't know either. Only the people who were there know. We do know that he was convicted of it, though (and I find it interesting that you yourself said "the man he was convicted of killing" instead of the more definitive "the man he murdered"). Anyway, I've spent a lot of time reading our Wrongful Conviction articles; they really do a lot to one's opinion of the death penalty (oh, and for the record, I think that Faulkner's murder was a horrible tragedy). DS (talk) 20:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Arthur Part2[edit]

  • Attention my fellow comrades. User:Chrisrus, has provided us with the site: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PUgDa1jy4) in which Arthur is supposed to have stated (I say "supposed" only because my internet connection is so slow that I haven't looked at it) that she was never a member of the United States Marine Corps. We "must" look into this because if it true then her name must be removed from the List of U.S. Marines. Please take a look and make recommendations. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)[edit]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haditha killings article edit[edit]

Your use of the phrase "words mean something" in your edit summary regarding your reverting of my edit to this article, in my opinion comes off as somewhat condescending in this context. Remember, there are in fact actual human beings out here who really are trying to act in "good faith"WP:AGF as editors in an attempt to help build a better encyclopedia. My specific reasoning for adding this article to the "massacre" category was the fact that the word is used in the first sentence of the piece as part of a descriptor of the event itself. I do have to disagree with your 'hard and fast' definition of the term; for instance, looking down the list of "massacres" included in the article List of events named massacres, it appears to me that there is quite a lot of room for manoeuvring. In that context, it appears to be validly applied to events ranging from the wholesale slaughter of tens of thousands, right down to the shooting of five people at the "Boston Massacre". Deconstructhis (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing IMG:VMF(N)-544.jpg[edit]

Hello. I thought I'd check with the original uploader (i.e. you) beforehand, but would it be alright if I replace the current .jpg image of the Marine Night Fighter Squadron 544's insignia with a high-resolution, digital rendering?

  • Old .jpg
    Old .jpg
  • New .svg
    New .svg
Good work. Looks alot better than the pic of the old patch.--Looper5920 (talk) 05:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...[edit]

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
June 14, 2009
Time: 3pm
Location: Drexel University

RSVP

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)[edit]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal[edit]

Thought I'd give you a heads up: Portal talk:United States Marine Corps#new section. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With the Old Breed[edit]

Kudos on your recent edits. You've done a lot for the article. I hate to dispute other people's edits but I saw that section and knew it needed a distinct stylistic change, so I flagged it. I've been a Sledge fan for nearly 40 years, long before I read any of his books, so I really have to watch my edits of his articles to prevent injection of my own POV. (I really regret that my observations of his loving and kind counseling efforts for Viet Nam vets among his students is strictly OR.) I appreciate your clearheaded edits. Thank you.Trilobitealive (talk) 04:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reserve unit assignments[edit]

With the deactivation of Marine Aircraft Group 46 last month, I've been able to figure out the disposition of its subordinate squadrons except for HMM-764. I think it may have deactivated with its sister squadron HMH-769, but there are no pres releases or anything to indicate as such. It's unit website still says it falls under MAG 46. Do you know? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 07:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your lists[edit]

Good day to you sir, I am attempting to get some of the USMC articles (particularly lists) up to featured status and I was pointed to a couple of yours relating to Active and inactive USMC aviation units and 1 in particular seems to be approaching FL status. That is the active aviation units one that you got to A class status. I made a couple of changes already and was about to make some more before I was stopped and pointed in your direction. Before I make the chanegs I will point some of them out and we can go from there. Please don't think I am critisizing your work I think you have done a fantastic job and I think this article is very close to featured list and most of these are minor changes.

  • There are quite a few dead links due to a recent revamp of the USMC homepage.
  • there are several sections that are a little spartan as far as content and before it gets submitted I think they should be expanded. Marine Heavy Helicopter Training Squadron for example.
  • The this is a list bit is deprectated so that can be removed.
  • The lead needs to be expanded a bit, including some info about what the marine corps is, aviation in relation to the USMC and some general info about the content of the aricle (how many active squadrons there are for example).
  • The references should come before the template.
  • Some of the units in the tables do not have a reference.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. --Kumioko (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)[edit]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq War OB[edit]

You do realise, don't you, that the refereed sentence immediately above says that the JSOTF-AP is always organised around an SFG HQ - which would make it very likely that the units involved are Army SOF? Buckshot06(prof) 19:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Book and CAF article[edit]

Just thought you might like to know of a good book that I've read recently and thought you might be interested in:

  • Mrazek, Robert J. (2008). A Dawn Like Thunder: The True Story of Torpedo Squadron Eight. Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0316021393. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)- About Hornet's torpedo squadron which was almost completely wiped out at Midway but was reconstituted and served with the CAF on Guadalcanal. One of the best Pacific War books that I've read.

By the way, I'm thinking of moving and enlarging the "Operations" section from the CAF article into a different article called, "Air war over Guadalcanal" or something like that, so that it can cover the entire aerial part of the Guadalcanal campaign as well as both the Allied and Japanese sides. Please let me know if you think that's a bad idea. I still plan on helping finish the CAF article also. Cla68 (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

editorials?[edit]

Dunno if you have Marine One watchlisted or not, but I thought I'd draw your attention to some recent edits. The downright fascist web filtering we have on our net usage is blocking me from seeing these refs properly, and I'm dubious about just how encyclopedic a "helpful editorial" can be. It might also be better at VH-71 instead. Given that the user seems to be a SPA, I'm wondering is this might be some political axe-grinding. What do you think? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan D. Hunter awards[edit]

Do you have a ref for the awards you added to Duncan D. Hunter? Or were you merely making some educated guesses based on the biography? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't have a ref for them. They are based on his deployments and times. There are probably a few personal awards in there as well. The only way to get that info would be to email his staff or get hold of his DD-214.--Looper5920 (talk) 17:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)[edit]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
September 12, 2009
Time: 3 pm
Location: University City, Philadelphia

RSVP

NOTE: The date and time of this meetup has been changed to accommodate other regional activities.

The purpose of this meeting is to finalize our plans for the Wiki Takes Philadelphia event. We'll discuss logistics, establish jobs, and coordinate with participating groups.

The floor will also be open to discussing other projects relating to the Wiki and Free Culture movement.

Afterward at around 5pm, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Gabi Simson[edit]

The article Gabi Simson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No substantial claim of notability, fails WP:ENT. No sourcing, no Google News hits, negligible substantive Google search results

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved![edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 23:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fake veteran[edit]

Hi Looper! I've not edited in a very long time, but as you are a veteran, and still active here, I thought you might like to see this. There is a user named Hueydoc who has posted pics of himself in uniform wearing a bunch of ribbons and medals, to include the Soldiers Medal (for peacetime valor) and the Bronze Star. He has pictures of himself as a captain, then miraculously he becomes a Lieutenant Colonel in a pic from a year later. He has more rows of awards than a Banana Republic general, and is wearing a CIB, aviator (or aircrew) wings, airborne and air assault wings (which are positioned too low on the pocket), a slew of unit citations, and he looks to be way over-weight. A gallery for your enjoyment:

As you can see, as a severely overweight Captain, from pic 1 to pic 2, he has been awarded a Bronze Star, even though I don't see...

You know what, forget it. I will cut to the chase instead of listing everything that is wrong with this Jesse Macbeth wanna-be. First, you know better than me at this point who the vets are on here now, since I have been inactive for a while. Could you (no pressure) let them know about this guy and also if you are an administrator, is there a way get his user page of lies deleted? Or maybe we should let it stand - the Stolen Valor Act imposes a $5000 fine for a false claim of a Bronze Star, Soldiers Medal, etc...hehehe --Nobunaga24 (talk) 01:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that his combat unit patch is for special forces, he's wearing aviators wings as well as infantry badges, and in the Lt Col photo is wearing jump wings from some foreign military that I don't recognize. Cla68 (talk) 05:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it explains on his userpage that they're Canadian jump wings. Cla68 (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Draft verison of Battle of Battle of Chosin Reservoir[edit]

Hi, I see that you are the majot editor on the article Battle of Chosin Reservoir, would you mind to take a look of my draft rewrite for this article? I could really use some help on copyediting and another opinion to check whether my research is complete/NPOV. Jim101 (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Good bio[edit]

Hi Looper, Yes - I've been on hiatus. RL has been so busy. Your note caught me on the first day I've logged in for quite awhile. I'll take a look this weekend. Hope all is going well with you. — ERcheck (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)[edit]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3 4colorlogo.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3 4colorlogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3-5emblem.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3-5emblem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:20, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:4-MAG-13.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:4-MAG-13.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:5bn11marLOGO.gif[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:5bn11marLOGO.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 01:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:9thcommlogo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:9thcommlogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 02:55, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:W2 usmc vmf214 boyington.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:W2 usmc vmf214 boyington.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3 4colorlogo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:3 4colorlogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-5emblem.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:3-5emblem.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:4-MAG-13.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:4-MAG-13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:5bn11marLOGO.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:5bn11marLOGO.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 23:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started![edit]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMH-466 insignia.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HMH-466 insignia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 06:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMM-165-2.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HMM-165-2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 06:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heavy-haulers.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Heavy-haulers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hma775 insig.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hma775 insig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hmh-465.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hmh-465.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hmh361c insig.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hmh361c insig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hmh363 insig.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Hmh363 insig.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hmh463.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hmh463.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hmla169 insig.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hmla169 insig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vancouver Outlaw (Speak) 07:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3MAWcopyTecom.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'mperator 19:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:4-MAG-13.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:4-MAG-13.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'mperator 20:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:3rdBn11thMarReg.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'mperator 14:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:VMF(N)-544.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:VMF(N)-544.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mm40 (talk) 01:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia[edit]

You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
October 4, 2009
Time: 12 pm
Location: Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City, Philadelphia

RSVP

Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.

Scheduled for Sunday, October 4, 2009, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.

Register your team here

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dos Gringos[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dos Gringos, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dos Gringos. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abductive (reasoning) 05:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)[edit]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe[edit]

[2] It might actually be true that airmen are generally in better shape immediately after basic training than USMC recruits, perhaps because the AF recruits don't suffer as many injuries since most of their training is in the classroom instead of in the field. Based on my experience, however, they don't stay that way for very long. That goes for the officers too. I once had a boss (an AF lieutenant colonel), promoted below-the-zone, who bragged that she had never passed a PT test in her entire career. How's that for setting a good example? Cla68 (talk) 23:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nudge[edit]

'Bout time, doncha think? :D

Haven't been seeing your name on my watchlist much lately, hope all is well with you. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, FYI: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/10/marine_osprey_103109w/ bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the note. I am not in a position to do any serious editing for the next 6 months or so. I would love to expand on some of the links you provided. If I get a chance I will but I think I am just going to be reverting vandalism for the time being. Hope all is well.--205.56.145.36 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest![edit]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)[edit]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vmfa 232.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Vmfa 232.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZooFari 06:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vmf-111insignia.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Vmf-111insignia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZooFari 06:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mals-16.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Mals-16.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZooFari 18:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Philadelphia slang[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Philadelphia slang. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philadelphia slang. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)[edit]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

China Marine (memoir)[edit]

Hello, I've noticed that you make effective and well worded edits and have recently done so on With the Old Breed. If you're interested in helping clean up another article about another Eugene Sledge book, I've cobbled together an initial stub on China Marine which sorely needs both another viewpoint and the touch of someone who knows the English language better than me. If not, let me know if you know anyone else who's interested. I'll follow your talk page for a few days. Thanks for reading this. Trilobitealive (talk) 04:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the note. I have read the book and will eventually make some edits but I am not in a position to do so for the next couple of months. Sorry for the delay. I only get to chack this every blue moon due to work. Come April timeframe I ill be of more help. Hope the holidays treated you well.--Looper5920 (talk) 10:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hope things come out OK. "Work is the curse of the drinking class"-WC Fields. Thanks for the reply. Trilobitealive (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • When you get back to it the most trouble I had not adding OR was with the discussion of his hatred of the Japanese soldiers. I knew him in life, knew he had a number of Japanese students, and he spoke of Japanese professional associates and friends he highly regarded. He treated them decently and in a kindly manner but in his books he skims over this. He hated the Japanese army and its soldiers with an undying hatred but made scant mention of the honorable way he treated the Japanese on campus. You can't really see past his hatred to the love of humanity sometimes just from the writing itself. Trilobitealive (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)[edit]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fallujah begining of 04[edit]

Hey man, I was just having a trip down memory lane and seen a picture you took of my campany (B) engaging shit heads in fallujah. I was wondering if you have any pics you can send to me from that time frame while with us? I was a Lcp. in 3rd squad at the time with 3rd plt. bravo co. I would like to have any or all the pictures you have of that time please. I hate to remember them shitty times but yet I just can't seem to stop thinking about and researching it ya know. my email is cortyc@hotmail.com thanks again man, stay safe, semper fi Craig Cortes

Kupper[edit]

I'm really not sure. The claim that the MOPH chapter named after him is a bit dubious since thier website doesn't mention him aside from that really odd "citation," which I find just as dubious as you do. The service number (misnamed a "serial" number) given doesn't match the block issued during the time frame (they weren't issuing 2xx,xxx numbers in until 1936). I agree on the dubious nature of some of the other claims, especially teh Navy Cross; there would be some kind of record of that. The creator of the article hasn't edited anything else... I smell a possible hoax. I've tagged it with {{Hoax}} and will do more investigations. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 12:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've left some more thoughts on the talk page and emailed you a copy of the letter I typed up for your input. Please let me know what you think, I'm gonna hold of dropping it in the mail until I hear from you. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for your speedy improvements to the new article on Camp Kearny. I was disappointed to discover there was no article, merely a redirect to MCAS Miramar, so I created it on the quick. However, more input is needed from knowledgeable people like yourself. Thanks again. --MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Marble Mountain Airifield from above.jpg[edit]

There is no copyright tag on File:Marble Mountain Airifield from above.jpg that you uploaded recently. Please add one, so it does not get deleted. You may want to verify the permission you claim by following the procedure in WP:PERMISSION. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 05:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert Joseph Kupper[edit]

I've nominated the subject article for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubert Joseph Kupper. —KuyaBriBriTalk 05:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning this edit: I sympathise with your desire to retain the mdy format, although I wouldn't buck an existing international format in a US military article if pre-existing (the battleships seem to be all international, per US Navy). However, the date should not be linked, and nor should common terms and common country-names such as the United States. More effective wikilinking if rationed to the uncommon, those that are useful to the reader in understanding the current article. Please see WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. Tony (talk) 08:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)[edit]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:27th Marines.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:27th Marines.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:28th Marines.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:28th Marines.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1bn9mar a insig.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:1bn9mar a insig.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Flight Time[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Flight Time, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight Time. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 21:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, I never imagined I would get so much heat for an AfD nomination. One of the reasons I probably will not volunteer for the RfA process (though I might reconsider if someone were to nominate me): it's very painful to be under that microscope. Your thoughts were made clear with the prod, I'd appreciate it if you could voice them on the AfD. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 19:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm being transferred to MASS-1. I'm guessing you've been with a MASS before? Do you have any words of wisdom for me? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 00:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Corps[edit]

I have noticed you do a lot of work on Marine Corps topics including the MAG-40 article and Operation Moshtarak. Are you in the Marines and possibly deployed to Afghanistan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marine79 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Louis Robertshaw[edit]

Updated DYK query On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Louis Robertshaw, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Theaters of operation for the War on Terrorism[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Theaters of operation for the War on Terrorism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theaters of operation for the War on Terrorism. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open![edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Marble Mountain Airifield from above.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Marble Mountain Airifield from above.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I was adding the Medal of Honor Monument thumb to each recipient, ie. Here, while doing this I noticed between all 4 of the Men's pages thier could be a little more "Uniformity" of thier "Citation" section ie. some citation headers missing, President's name/signature etc. Anyway, it occurred to me (while I was linking words within the Citation) that it is probably not apporiate to change the text of a Citation/Government Document of this type. Of course I'm not talking about actually changing any of the text but Linking the words within the document and seeing the "Blue" text in such a document, Just doesn't seem proper to me. I was "Wikifying" the section and still will work on them but I wanted to bounce this off someone before proceeding. Mlpearc MESSAGE 19:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My personal opinon on this is to not add blue links to the citations and to let them stand on their own. Most of the time the information in the citation has been condensed into prose in the main body of the article with the appropriate links already provided. Thus linking the citation becomes redundant. That being said there is no Wiki policy regarding and I would say use your best judgement as long as the text of the citation is not changed. Hope this helps.--Looper5920 (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I feel the same way, so I will work on them, (un-linking) them. I also agree most of the links would be redundant. Thank you for your input it has been very helpful. Mlpearc MESSAGE 05:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Was working on the links as per our discussion above, I came across this Ref Here . I feel the same here also. I do have a idea, if someone see's the need for ref can't we not move it to the section header, that would still be appropriate place for "this" ref, I don't know if it appropriate to place Ref's at section headers, your thoughts ? Mlpearc MESSAGE 19:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)[edit]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Con Thien[edit]

Looper, if you want to make substantive changes to the Con Thien article or correct typos please go ahead, but there is no value in you going through my text and changing the dates from "1 May" to "May 1" or moving photos from gallery into the text body. Regards MZtourist.

The dates can go either way but the way in which you having been writing your updates almost begs for the dates to be changed so it reads more like prose and less like a day by day after action report. As for the images the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Image Layout Guidelines prefer that they be spaced throughout the article vice in gallerys which unnecessarily break up the page. You'll notice that any decent article in this encyclopedia follows this.--Looper5920 (talk) 03:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The way you moved the images in the Con Thien article put them out of context with the text which is why I adopt the gallery format. regards Mztourist(Mztourist (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

VPB-104 WWII Pacific Squadron[edit]

I'm excited to see activity on the page mentioned, but very concerned about some of your contributions. The current redirect of 104 to 24 greatly confuses the squadron history. I wonder if you would consider undoing the redirect so that the various incarnations of squadrons can evolve independently with cross links.

Please read all of the references in the original article before deciding whether to press for the solution you have proposed. As the 24 November 2009 version of the article points out, there were many changes in the squadron number and mission over the years.

  • NOTE: each of those squadron numbers had very different missions. The mission of VPB-104 was very different from that of previous and subsequent squadron number reassignments. Each number flew different aircraft and most had different squadron commanders. Many also had different aircrews.

Your current redirect of 104 to 24 prevents history specific to each of the squadron numbers from being clearly described and clarified by additional researchers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jw4nvc (talk • contribs) 20:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia[edit]

You're invited to the
Wiki Takes Philadelphia
April 11, 2010
Time: 12 pm
Location: Drexel Quad (33rd and Market)
University City, Philadelphia

RSVP

Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.

Scheduled for Sunday, April 11, 2010, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fortitudine[edit]

I thought you might like to know that Fortitudine is now hosted on the web (such as this ref). I'm not sure if you previously lacked access to it before, but they are pretty good at turning out at least one gem per issue. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 00:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Looper5920's Day![edit]

User:Looper5920 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Looper5920's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Looper5920!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened![edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Looper5920/Archive_11&oldid=1143359525"