User talk:Lissoy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On November 8, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Horace King (architect), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done. An interesting read.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Akofa_bonsi.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Akofa_bonsi.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AHSAA logo.PNG[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AHSAA logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 17:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on finding those sources: I'm sometimes a bit doubtful when I see golf courses come up on new page patrol but these look good. Would be better if one of them were linked on the www I gues, but you can't have everything! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 18:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Auburnites[edit]

Who are you to decide who is a 'notable' auburnite, and who is not? To me that smacks of an opinion, rather than a hard fact. People with different interests and backgrounds would all have different ideas on who is notable, and who is not. To some people who don't care about football, why does it matter is someone was once the 3rd string punter for Auburn University? You might likewise think the same of someone else in a different field, and that's fine. But how can you edit off someone who was in the same classification/field as another person listed in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.226.177 (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You raise a good point. I have reworked the list to be a little more objective and only include those who are sufficiently notable to have a Wikipedia article. That way we can use WP:BIO as a defacto notability guideline. Thanks for your suggestions! -- Lissoy (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dyk well done on another one[edit]

Updated DYK query On 15 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert D. Knapp, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cheers Victuallers (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs[edit]

I have nominated 2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 AHSAA Football Playoffs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 11:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Mark Spencer-cropped.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mark Spencer-cropped.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:James Fukai.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:James Fukai.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Polly (Parrot) 22:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Akofa Bonsi.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Akofa Bonsi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Polly (Parrot) 22:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of O. B. Drake Middle School, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Drake Middle School. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Auburn-AL-city-flag.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Auburn-AL-city-flag.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you need is WikiSpot[edit]

Hi. Obviously you are a huge fan of the city of Auburn. I'm not sure of your real name, but you must have heard of me because you listed me in the first version of the Auburn High graduates page.

It's interesting enough to have all of this content for Auburn in Wikipedia. But it would be much more useful for Auburn to have what Davis has right now, a WikiSpot site. See the page for DavisWiki, and DavisWiki itself. DavisWiki is so influential that just about every city official and restaurant owner in town know about it. Greg Kuperberg (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mike Pugh[edit]

I have nominated Mike Pugh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Pugh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. fuzzy510 (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James E. Martin Aquatics Center[edit]

Hello, I was wondering if it would be alright if I used the picture found on James E. Martin Aquatics Center on the article Auburn Tigers swimming and diving. Thanks! AUburnTiger (talk) 01:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Reassessment of Auburn_High_School[edit]

Auburn_High_School has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ruslik_Zero 10:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The Bottle, Alabama.jpg[edit]

Hi, could you please add some source info to the photo? Thanks.

Thank you for uploading File:The Bottle, Alabama.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much! Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 23:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis problem at Opelika High School[edit]

Please see the article talk page before re-adding this information. Thanks, (talk) 20:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for Campus Ambassadors in Houston[edit]

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian connected with Rice University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at another Houston school, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live in Houston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Census[edit]

Hey Lissoy! Why haven't you changed Auburn's census numbers to reflect the actual being lower than the 2009 estimate? Dontheman69Dontheman69 (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Youssef-Biaz.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Youssef-Biaz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. 06:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Auburn city schools.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Auburn city schools.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a slow edit war going on here with content that you mentioned reverting in March 2011, on the talk page. I have again reverted it today and warned the editor/s involved. See Talk:Jay Jacobs (athletic director)#Copyright problem removed for details and links. - 220 of Borg 01:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Auburn-high-volleyball.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Auburn-high-swimming.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Auburn High golf team.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Auburn High golf team.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Auburn high aerial.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Auburn high aerial.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've sent in an OTRS ticket concerning the email giving permission for use of this image. - Lissoy (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Auburn high school sources[edit]

Hi, Lissoy. You surely see the above four messages regarding permission (apologies regarding that, but we need it for legal reasons... renunciation of one's copyrights isn't valid unless it's in writing... it's complicated), but I'm writing about a few other images you've uploaded. Specifically, they don't have a source:

Can you try to remember where you got those photos? It's actually important because US copyrights are based on when something is published, not when it's created. If any of the above images was published within a certain timeframe, they actually aren't free (again, it's complicated [1]). I'm sure most editors will be too picky about it, but can you please tell us how you got the images originally, whether scanned from the school archives, scanned from a yearbook, family collection, etc.

Also there is this image, which you assert was published before 1964 but never give the publication source:

Sorry for the legalese; hope you're able to provide as much of this information as possible!

PS. If you don't end up responding here in the next few days, please leave me a note on my talk page that you've responded when you finally do. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I would appreciate if you could respond to my concerns on the above images. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It took me a while to go back and dig out the information you were looking for, but here we go:
    • File:Auburn-high-school-class-of-1897.jpg - taken in 1897, first published in the Lee County Bulletin as part of article "Miss Lucile Burton Says High School Graduation Was All-Girl in 1897", May 29, 1947 with no notice of copyright. Based on this, it should fall under PD-PRE1964.
    • File:Auburn-high-girls-baseball-team-1910s.jpg - taken around 1914, distributed to the public in a scrapbook form in spring 1915; I located the photo through the George Alfonso Wright Papers, 1900-1990 - RG 837 in the Manuscript Collections of the Special Collections and Archives at Auburn University.
    • File:Auburn-high-school-1870.jpg - taken between 1899 and 1920 based on the buildings around it by unknown photographer, I located it in the Auburn University Archives; I do not know of the original date of publication, but I do have a copy of a published version in The Auburn Bulletin, "School days: Pot-bellied stoves, cucumber sandwiches, and one-eyed cat", August 30, 1978 with no notice of copyright and an attribution to the Auburn University Archives.
    • File:Auburn-female-college-chapel.jpg - taken between 1883 and 1888 by unknown photographer; I located the photo in the Auburn University Archives.
    • File:Auburn-high-class-of-1929.jpg - taken in 1929, distributed to the public as part of a collection of photos associated with the graduation of the Auburn High School class of 1929; I located the photo in the Carolyn Jenkins Collection, 1913-1933 - RG 93 in the Manuscript Collections of the Special Collections and Archives at Auburn University.
  • Let me know if more information is needed about these works. - Lissoy (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Most of those seem good enough. Some of them are probably limited publication, but I'm frankly not going to pick on it unless a rights-holder gets upset about it (I don't know enough about the circumstances of the distribution to the public, and I doubt it will be an issue anyway). As for the second to last one, is there any other information you can provide, like which section you found it in, and if it's ever been published in any way?

Creek War of 1836[edit]

I saw you had started to improve the article Creek War of 1836 on your userpage:Creek War of 1836, but stopped work on it in late 2010. I would like to encourage you to finish it or atleast add what you already have to the present article. It is much better than what is currently there. 66.214.13.190 (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bee Hive name?[edit]

I've been looking at the article for Bee Hive, Auburn, and I'm pretty sure the community should be spelled as Beehive. The USGS GNIS lists it as Beehive and the local road is Beehive Rd. I know the map you included on the page lists it as Bee Hive though. Should we go by the GNIS, since that's what is used for all the other place names on Wikipedia? Also, I was wondering if we could classify Beehive as an unincorporated community, since according to that map and others, it lies outside of the Auburn city limits? If we can classify as that, I'll add it to the Lee County page and template. Thanks!Dofftoubab (talk) 21:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Auburn High School Tigers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with Central of Phenix City, Enterprise, Jeff Davis and Robert E. Lee of Montgomery, Prattville], and Smiths Station high schools.<ref>Alabama High School Athletic Association ''[http://www.ahsaa.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lissoy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lissoy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lissoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auburn-high-class-1926.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Auburn-high-class-1926.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc () 01:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Horace-king-young.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]