User talk:Liquidcross

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I think it's great that you want to hep out, but unfortunately, your username appeared to me to be too close to that of an existing user, User:LiquidGhoul. If you want to contribute, I really do encourage you to do so. But I must tell you to get a different username. You just happened on to an unlucky coincidence, and if you meant no harm, I am truly sorry. But as long as you are creating another account, take a look at out username policy.--Here T oHelp 21:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here, read this official template: {{UsernameBlocked}}. It's nothing you did wrong and I'm very sorry. We still want you here.--Here T oHelp 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can still edit your talk page (this page), you know.--Here T oHelp 21:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to get consensus to get you unblocked. Please hold on, administrators are discussing it, but things take a while sometimes. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to be evil. I unblocked him myself. I apologize, maybe that was a bit rash. I was just trying to avoid confusion. It appears I was a catalyst.--Here T oHelp 23:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is everything all set now? --Liquidcross 01:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably too late now, but I don't have any problem with the name. It is pretty different, and I don't think many people will get us confused, as we most probably don't edit in the same subjects anyway (looking at your contributions). I would only have a problem if it were purposeful to try and get me in trouble, which I really doubt from what I have seen. --liquidGhoul 09:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I'm definitely not trying to imitate you. I didn't even know of your existence until this whole mess began! No harm done. Now I just need to wait for the unblock to go through, so I can get back to work. :) --Liquidcross 13:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried doing some edits this morning, and the system is saying I'm blocked again. The message I received when trying to edit follows my unblock request. Any thoughts? --Liquidcross 13:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by HereToHelp for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Liquidcross". The reason given for Liquidcross's block is: "Too close to User:LiquidGhoul. Your IP address is 63.120.8.162.

I can't find that autoblock, can you try again and report the unblock tag if it's still happening. --pgk^(talk) 19:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is; it's the same as before. --Liquidcross 19:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by HereToHelp for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Liquidcross". The reason given for Liquidcross's block is: "Too close to User:LiquidGhoul. Welcome to create a new, distinct account if he so c" Your IP address is 63.120.8.162.

OK found it now, just couldn't see it for looking. I've undone it, sometimes the autoblocker doesn't release properly, so try again and let me know how you get on. --pgk^(talk) 19:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be working now. Thanks! I hope his whole mess didn't come about because I use multiple computers... --Liquidcross 20:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad that got sttled out. My apologies.--Here T oHelp 20:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Densetsu no Stafy[edit]

Hello there! I noticed you made the Legend of Stafy page, which I've been working on a lot as well. I have a question for you, since you're obviously fluent in the Japanese language while I am not. Is Stafy a starfish, or is he something else? Sometimes I hear people saying that he's a "sky star." Which is correct?

Thanks! --Liquidcross 13:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is probably a mystery, so I believe it is best to ask some Japanese fans about him. He's probably like SpongeBob SquarePants, which he is looks like two similar things.

Parrothead1983 17:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know, that the main Stafy theme is in Donkey Konga 1? It is titled as "Legend of Stafy". --Parrothead1983 13:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding! Is it only in the Japanese version of the game? --Liquidcross 19:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I thought it was also in the American version. I'm hearing people now believing that the correct spelling is Starfy, because of TOSE saying it and FryGuy64 also said that, but it can't be, because the official websites' URL paths, images, and the poster in M&L 1 use Stafy. If Stafy appears in Super Smash Bros. Brawl, and if Nintendo releases it in America and other countries in English, and if they spell his name as Stafy, then the mystery is solved. If not, then the name controversy continues. The reason why the Legend of Stafy franchise never came to America, is because TOSE wants to always be "behind the scenes", eventhough the Game & Watch Gallery titles they developed were released worldwide. --Parrothead1983 20:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A recent Gamasutra interview with TOSE did indeed say that the official English spelling is Starfy. However, another TOSE interview on the same site a few months before said it was Stafy! I don't think we'll ever know for sure until a Densetsu no Stafy game comes out in the US. They didn't even use his name in Super Princess Peach! Though, on the poster of him in Mario & Luigi, it's spelled "Stafy." It's so confusing. --Liquidcross 13:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Densetsu-no-Stafy-4.png[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Densetsu-no-Stafy-4.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stapy.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stapy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kyorosuke.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyorosuke.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Densetsu-no-Stafy-4.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Densetsu-no-Stafy-4.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]