Hello Lilyfan87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Fabricationary 14:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re this edit. Is there any reason why you reverted my edit? The categories added are required by Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography. Also Of the three girls, Rose seems to get the most male attention is not a neutral point of view and is here say which doesn't fit in with an encyclopaedia. Also you removed a bypass redirect which speeds up Wikipedia. The Tunbridge Wells article is Royal Tunbridge Wells. Or is she from somewhere else in the borough than the town of Royal Tunbridge Wells? Thanks, Regan123 12:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From my talk page: she does tho. I am well jealous. Lilyfan87 14:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Regardless this is unencyclopedic. I am restoring the deleted cats and removing the NPOV stuff again. Regan123 23:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
all the boys like her. more than the other two. i like Robbie Williams.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 13:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop disrupting Wikipedia with your childish comments on other people's user pages. It will get you blocked. Bubbahotep 14:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated./wangi 23:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated Maggie May (dog), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie May (dog) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Regarding your edit to the Judy article. It's not a matter of speaking English or not. It's simply that Wikipedia must not be written from a personal point of view. As 'Twas Now' answered your question on the reference desk: [1], it is a matter of personal opinion. Some people think it's a bad word, but others do not. Thus we can not state in the article that it is not a bad word. The relevant policy page is this: WP:NPOV. Please also note that you have reverted other users' edits on that page three times in the last 24 hours. Doing so again will be in violation of the 3 revert rule, which could result in a block. All the best - Akamad 12:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
cos i donnt no what u want cos i told u where it is, i didnt upload it i just no where it is on teh internet. Lilyfan87 19:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You need to explain on the image description page, why the image should be permitted on Wikipedia under Wikipedia's rules for fair use. Also, the image has been listed as being a replaceable fair use image. This means that it illustrates a subject for which a free image might reasonably be found or created that adequately provides the same information. If you feel that the image cannot be replaced with a free image, you must add the template {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image page, giving a reason why it cannot be recreated. Please do not remove the existing templates from the page - but instead, read what they say! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Tim Saunders) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Turlo Lomon 13:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Turlo Lomon 13:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
yeah but ur kust gonna delete it anyway but i wanna know where my article went.
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bubbahotep 14:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
Make your case on the article's talk page.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
but that's not the point. u habven#t answered my quesiton. u cand just delete stuff without telling anyone. u murdered Maggie May (dog), im not going to let u murder gwenno's dad too.
Please read WP:CSD. the article you created qualified under one of wikipedias cretiera for speedy deletion. Probably because there was no assertion of notability (why is it important?) and reliable third party sources to back up your assertion. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a warning that if you continue to re-create pages that have been deleted, you may be temporarily blocked from editing wikipedia. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Lilyfan87! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 10:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 12:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I deleted that line was because it is clear from the picture on the article that she has light blonde hair and doesn't wair glasses. Thus there is no need to say so in the text. - Akamad 12:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 12:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Photobucket is a picture site, picture sites are not reliable sources, they contain pictures. Everybody can upload pictures to that site. The picture may be correct (and in this case, it is correct), but they are not acceptable, not by WP:RS, not by WP:EL, not by WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. If this is a picture that is suitable, you can upload the picture. Please stop readding the links, discuss on the talkpage. --Dirk BeetstraTC 12:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for 1 week - yandman 14:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for
a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Please edit constructively or not at all. Adding nonsense to articles is not appreciated. Thank you. -- BigDT 14:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm sorry, in what way have I vandalized? In reference to this edit: 15 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Gwenno Pipette (rv "doesn't wear glasses etc"), removing the comment "She has light blonde hair and does not wear glasses," is not vandalism but an improvement to the article, since this information is not encyclopedic. Please review the guidelines for vandalism before placing a comment on my talk page. Additionally, if you do not agree with an edit to a page, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Thanks. --Cody.Pope 22:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
cos that so you can tell her apart from becki cos if they were in a band & 1 was the bassist & 1 was the druimmer u could say 1 is the bassist and 1 is the drummer but cos they have 3 lead singers they have 2. U WILL BE IN BIG TRUBBLE FOR THIS VANDALIZM.
PS now i cant tell u bout this cos sum twat bannd me!!!
Hi Lilyfan87. Your edits to the Rose Pipette article are non-encyclopaedic, which is why they are being removed. The removal of such edits is not vandalism as you claim, but a cleanup of the article according to Wikipedia standards. You have already violated the 3-revert rule by repeatedly reverting legitimate edits. Please either reword your edit so it has encyclopaedic significance or refrain from reverting other users' edits. You may be blocked if you keep doing this. — |||antiuser (talk) (contribs) 18:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 13:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Turlo Lomon 13:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
