User talk:Lestatdelc/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links FYI[edit]

FYI, generally if an external link is already in the infobox, per the WP:EL guideline, we usually don't repeat it in the EL section. Basically the infobox spot is considered a more prominent space, so having it there helps distinguish it from the others. But great job with all the new election related articles. Aboutmovies (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Merkley[edit]

As I said in my comment when I edited the Jeff Merkley article the first time, please review the Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution for proof that his term started on Jan 3, and not today. Foofighter20x (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New COTW[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week. First off, thank you to everyone who has done work the last few weeks on the last two COTWs. This week we have by request Oregon and California Railroad, part of the lands involved in the Oregon Land Fraud Scandal. Then as part of the Stub elimination drive, we have longtime politician Grattan Kerans, which hopefully can be turned into a nice DYK entry. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon award[edit]

WPOR Award: Sponsored in part by the Big Gold Dude.
You are hereby granted this shiny object for all your hard work at WikiProject Oregon!
For all your work in December on election stuff. Great job. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saxbe fix[edit]

In the past, you have helped us edit Saxbe fix. It is up for review at WP:FAC and I could use some help addressing concerns of the reviewers.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Museums & Prisons COTW[edit]

Howdy to all those in WikiProject Oregon land! To start, thanks to those who helped improve Grattan Kerans and Oregon and California Railroad as part of the Collaboration of the Week. This week we’ll try and start some new articles with a red link elimination drive on a couple of Oregon lists. So, you have your pick of prisons, or museums. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referendum approved / rejected‎ templates[edit]

Gnevin has removed the images you put in these templates. We talked a couple months ago about this here. There is a discussion here. – Zntrip 01:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the discussion is not about the icons but about merging the two templates. Can you pleas have a other look at that discussion Gnevin (talk) 09:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to let you know FYI that USER Chris Cunningham is back to it again with the USPres Navbox, and said I should not have made each box unique! Bluedogtn (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B-day for Oregon[edit]

Hello to WikiProject Oregon peoples! Thank you to those who helped start some new articles on prisons and museums. This week, in honor of Oregon’s 150th b-day, we have the slightly older Oregon Constitution and the first state governor John Whiteaker. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xenophopia does not involve a Xylophone: Another WPORE COTW[edit]

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon members. A big thank you to everyone who helped last week with the Oregon Constitution and John Whiteaker. This week, we have by request Clyde Drexler and a newer article in Religion in Oregon (I thought surveys said we didn’t have religion in Oregon). Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Oregon COTW, its Totally Rad[edit]

Greetings WikiProject Oregon peoples. It is once again time for another edition of the World Famous Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on Clyde and [the lack of] Religion in Oregon. This week (as many have noticed), we have the “it was a red link” and by request Eugene Station and Heceta Head in honor of the work that’s been going on at Oregon Coast. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. On a side note, does the recent news of Portland being the unhappiest place in all the land make people there more unhappy? Aboutmovies (talk) 06:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon Government 2.0[edit]

Hi there. I'm one of the guys getting involved with the Oregon Government 2.0 project. I'm trying to get all the interested parties involved.

As you might be aware, we've made some progress. Earlier this month, Pete got his representative, Ben Cannon (D–46 Portland), to introduce HB 3091. It addresses copyright of works produced either by a state agency or with funding from the state treasury. Read it in PDF or HTML format. It has been referred to the House Rules Committee, where it awaits to be put on the agenda, last time I checked. My representative, Bill Garrard (R–56 Klamath Falls), is a member of this committee, and he seems to support this bill. I'm trying to work with him to keep it moving.

Further details are being recorded at the PDX Wiki page and its talk page. If you haven't recently taken some time to consult these pages, please do. Also, please share all your thoughts, suggestions, concerns, etc., at the talk page.

In order to help keep this bill alive, one thing we need to know is who our respective legislators are. This way, if we need to target a particular legislator, we can have the benefit of knowing one of their constituents. I think Rep. Tobias Read (D–27 Beaverton), another member of the House Rules Committee, is from your immediate neighborhood. Please go here and add yourself to the table to indicate who your senator and representative are. If you don't know, find out.

Thanks. — Athelwulf [T]/[C] 00:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

V is for Victory at the COTW: Brought to you by the Letter W (naming rights still available)[edit]

Hear ye, hear ye WikiProject Oregon villagers. Tis time for another edition of ye ol’ Collaboration Of Thine Week. Thank you to those who worked on Eugene Station and Heceta Head the last few weeks, may the Black Death spare ye family. This time we have a we little stub in the John Ross Tower and by request Bill Walton in honor of a pretty good chance at making the playoffs for the Blazers (sorry can’t think of a good Old English type language for that one, but if we go with Olde English 800, then the Jail Blazers could come into play). Anyway, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zeus is a really cool dude and he thinks these WP:ORE articles are cool too[edit]

Greetings WikiProject Oregon guys and gals. Once again it is time for another edition of the our niche market Collaboration Of The Week. As always, thank you to those who worked on the Ross Tower and Walton. For this week we have the Calapooya Mountains and by request (and in honor of the opening) the venerable Portland Saturday Market. Just remember, if you are feeling blue, try breathing (rimshot please). Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

U too can help Oregon[edit]

Howdy WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week. A big thank you to those who worked on Calapooya Mountains and Portland Saturday Market, both saw some great improvements. For this week we have two great opportunities for DYKs with Brian McMenamin and Algoma, Oregon. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saxbe fix FA and TFA[edit]

This user helped promote Saxbe fix to the main page as Today's Featured Article on 6 March 2009.

I am recognizing you for being one of the many people who came together to improve Saxbe fix as part of its development which has resulted in its WP:FA and WP:TFA status.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bring on the COTW[edit]

Good afternoon WikiProject Oregon peoples. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week, Volume 82. Thank you to those who worked on Algoma, Oregon‎ and Brian McMenamin, both saw some great improvements and are up for DYks. This week we have Mary Alice Ford and by request Waterfront Blues Festival. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Live long and phosphorous. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

XOXOXO - Oregon loves you, now love Oregon back![edit]

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week. A big thank you to those who worked on Mary Alice Ford ‎ and the Waterfront Blues Festival, both saw some great improvements. In honor of the great weather, we have our Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive for this week’s collaboration. You can go out and take a picture, or search for a free one on the Internet, or in some cases remove an old request. See the bottom of this page for some links to a variety of free sources. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blah blah blah, Oregon COTW[edit]

Hello to members of the WikiProject o' Oregon. Once again it is time for the Collaboration Of The Week. A thank you to everyone who participated in the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, we added a lot of pictures. For this edition we have by request Mr. Maurice Lucas of the Blazers, and a maintenance type project with the Dab Patrol. For the later, pick any Oregon disambiguation page (mainly common city names) and use the "What links here" feature to find any stray incoming links and direct them to the correct article. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Peace out! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Brownlow[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Brownlow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

fails WP:POLITICIAN. tagged for notability for half a year.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RayTalk 00:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kite Man Says beware of powerlines[edit]

Hello to those who participate in WikiProject Oregon. Once again it is time for the Collaboration Of The Week. A thank you to everyone who participated in the Dab Patrol and improvements to Maurice Lucas. For this week we have Oregon company FLIR Systems, and a maintenance type project with the FA Update Drive. For the later, pick any Oregon FA class article and read through it to make sure it is still up-to-date. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. I like frogs. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boz rates the day a Perfect Ten[edit]

Greetings and salutations to members of WikiProject Oregon. We hear bye announce another Collaboration Of The Week. Thanks to anyone who participated in updating any FA articles and for the improvements on FLIR Systems. This week we have two requests: former Blazer Sidney Wicks, and a key historical event with Oregon land fraud scandal. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid/blank info for Oregon measures — Where is it?[edit]

On several articles for Oregon ballot measures, you've included info about invalid and blank votes in the infobox. Measures 51, 52, and 53 are examples. Where did you access this information? I can't find it. — Athelwulf [T]/[C] 22:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I figured out you can subtract the counted votes from the number of ballots turned in for that election (which the state reports) to get the number of invalid and blank votes. Clever! — Athelwulf [T]/[C] 20:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that's a pretty cool bit of info to have. I have a couple of concerns though.
First, that is not the way percentages are typically reported in Oregon media; and that's not how election law works. If a measure gets 25000 "yes" votes, 50000 "no" votes, and 25000 of the participating voters leave that measure blank, it is understood to have failed with 33% of the vote. But under the present format, the infobox would make it appear that measure got only 25% of the vote. The important number is how many of the people who voted on the measure voted yes. (The "supermajority" requirement of Measure 47 is a separate issue.)
Second, I'm not sure it's implemented consistently -- I just noticed that the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act article has no blank votes reported...which seems unlikely to me. Possible, but unlikely. What's the status of these -- are there some that haven't been done yet? Should we go over them for accuracy? -Pete (talk) 05:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Love the county-by-couty maps, by the way -- they were a great addition, along with the rest of your work on these, and I'm not sure I've said so before. -Pete (talk) 05:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pete, I think the template wants the yes/no tally and percentages to be derived from the valid votes only, unless, as you mentioned, there's a "double majority" requirement in place. That is to say, even though 17.84% of the 2008 primary election ballots left their vote for Measure 51 blank or somehow improperly voted it, this fact would not be considered relevant when calculating the 74.92% passage of this measure among the properly voted ballots. It's good that you spoke up, since it's an important detail to be clear on. — Athelwulf [T]/[C] 20:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hot outside, so stay inside working on the Oregon COTW![edit]

Hello to WikiProject Oregon folks, and get ready for another Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on the land fraud scandal and Mr. Wicks. This week we have one by request, Central Oregon, and a gnomish task, the Great Infobox Drive of '09. For the infobox drive, just find some articles without infoboxes and add one. People and companies are two prime areas as many do not have infoboxes, yet infoboxes exist for those areas. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back, Mr. COTW[edit]

Howdy after a long message absence to those of WikiProject Oregon. To answer a common question, no you did not get removed from the COTW notification list, I was just too busy to send out the notification for the last change. So, thank you to all those who helped improve Central Oregon and Mount Jefferson, as well as those who added infoboxes and adopted a governor. For this edition of the COTW, we have partly by request and in honor of the return of college football, Duck football and Beaver football. If you are a fan of neither, maybe go back and work on a governor or add infoboxes this time around. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insert profound knowledge and wisdom here with wacky side effects[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Oregon. First, thank you to all those who helped improve the Ducks and Beavers football teams. Second, now on with the countdown. For this edition of the COTW, we have by request Portland Hempstalk Festival and Munson Valley Historic District. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:10px-600px-Red x.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:10px-600px-Red x.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye summer, hello Dolly![edit]

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, it is time for another Collaboration of the Week. First, thanks to those who helped out the last few weeks improving the Portland Hempstalk Festival and the Munson Valley Historic District articles. This week we have by request Rasheed Wallace and the Oregon Zoo. The later should have lots of recent news with the new/old exhibit opening. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:15px-600px-Yes check.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:15px-600px-Yes check.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 14:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Columbus Day 2 all and 2 all a goodnite, beware of large windstorms bearing gifts[edit]

Greetings fellow WikiProject Oregon member, time to uncork a fine wine as it is once again time for the Collaboration of the Week. As always, thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving the Oregon Zoo, the Rasheed Wallace, Willamette Bridges, and the Vanport articles. This week we have by request Jim Paxson and Films shot in Oregon. The later can easily be improved just by adding some sources. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. And with Halloween fast approaching, remember that pennies really suck as a “treat” and you can expect toilet paper and or eggs on your residence for your “trick”. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tax revolt in critical care at a hospital near you[edit]

Hello fellow WikiProject Oregon member, once again time for the Collaboration of the Week in the land of Oregon. As always, thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving List of films shot in Oregon and Jim Paxson. This week we have by request Oregon tax revolt and not by request, the annual Hospital creation drive. For the later, I have laid out some sources here, and the remaining red links are all over the state, so you can find one near you! As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. May the wind always be beneath your wings. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's sunny out, quick take a picture![edit]

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again for another installment of as the Collaboration Of The Week Turns. A big thank you to last time’s guest stars who worked on Oregon tax revolt‎ and creating hospital articles, we had 3 DYKs off the hospital articles createdd. This week is the star-studded affair of the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, starring Lestatdelc. You can go out and take a picture, browse through Commons for an existing one, or search for a free one on the Internet, and in some cases remove an old request (or even add a request to an article that has no images). See the bottom of this page for some links to a variety of free sources. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PayLess at Sprouse-Reitz for your G.I. Joe's, brought to you by Troutman's Emporium and Frederick & Nelson[edit]

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, and seasons greetings. Here at Collaboration Of The Week we thank you for your efforts making Oregon better, at least on Wikipedia, and hope you are doing better than Joe's. Or, in the eloquent words of some marketing manager for another now defunct Oregon chain, Merry Christmas from PayLess... Merry Chriiiistmaaaasssss!!!

Now that pleasantries have been exchanged, thank you to those who worked on the last two collaborations, the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, and Oregon Country Fair and Geoff Petrie. For this edition of the COTW we have Gambling in Oregon and NRHP in Washington County. The hope for the later is to fill in the last few images (5) and then see if we can make it the first NRHP list in Oregon with an article for every entry (need 27). As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One last time for 2009[edit]

Happy New Year to you, you WikiProject Oregon member! Tis the season for one last Collaboration Of The Week to get started this year. Thank you to those who worked on Gambling in Oregon and NRHP in Washington County the last few weeks. For the final COTW of 2009, we have Archiving Article Talk Pages and Mr. Standard TV & Appliance, Bill Schonely. For the archiving, we have a lot of old, stale comments on article talk pages from before 2009 that should be archived away, so that new comments are not added to things that either were addressed or not worth addressing. Personally, I archive anything older than a year. Anyway, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Adios. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oregon U.S. Senate elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oregon U.S. House elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oregon U.S. Presidential elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon COTW v 3.0.2010ish[edit]

Greetings WikiProject Oregon team member. Time for the first new Collaboration Of The Week in 2010. Thank you to those who worked on Bill Schonely and archiving talk pages. For this week, we have Concordia University and the Berry Botanic Garden. Hopefully we can mine the garden’s website before it closes down. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Cheers and stuff. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just Out, COTW does well in new decade[edit]

Howdy WikiProject Oregon folks, time again for the latest installment of As the Collaboration Of The Week Turns. Last week was one of the more successful COTWs in recent memory as we really worked hard as a community to improve Concordia University and Berry Botanic Garden. Both are now at least C class articles and nicely illustrated (thanks to Tedder, Finetooth, and Ipoellet). Plus it really was a group effort as we had five different WPORE editors work on the garden and ditto with the school, with some overlap between the two.

Anyway, this week, we have by request the completely unrelated Just Out and Terrell Brandon. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. This message paid for by Fooians against COTW killing taxes. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon COTW and randomness[edit]

Greetings fellow WikiProject Oregon member, it is once again time for the Collaboration of the Week (yes, I know they are not actually every week anymore). Thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving Terrell Brandon, Just Out, 75th Oregon Legislative Assembly, and all the unreferenced BLPs. This week we have by request Oregon Coast Aquarium and Arvydas Sabonis (maybe the Blazers can sign him as I think he's healthy). Both need more sourcing. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. And remember folks, the only thing we have to fear is death and taxes, unless of course the dingo ate your baby, at which point you may feel the need, the for speed to get away from said dingos, which in turn can lead to a failure to communicate due to the dynamics of sound waves, though at some point hopefully we can all just get along. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Visual edition of the Oregon COTW featuring the Glass Palace[edit]

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, time for a new edition of the Collaboration of the Week. Thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving Oregon Coast Aquarium and Arvydas Sabonis. Also thank you to those few of you helped with the attempt to celebrate Women's History Month with Barbara Roberts and Ursula K. Le Guin.

This week we have by request the Memorial Coliseum that has been in the news a lot lately, and then one of the more important political figures in our state's history, Douglas McKay. The MC needs some ref work and EL work, and McKay really needs a lot more sourcing. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing problems with Initiated state statute[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Initiated state statute, please note that retroactively to November 1, 2008, Wikipedia can no longer accept text content that is only licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Text content must be released under at least the CC-BY-SA license, and preferably the GFDL. Please see Wikipedia:Licensing update for more information. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is an issue – the one basic, factual sentence in the article's content is probably not copyrightable. -Pete (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It Takes a Rim Village - Oregon COTW[edit]

Greetings WikiProject Oregon member, time for the next edition of the Collaboration of the Week. Thanks to those who assisted in improving a few articles over the last month. For May Day edition of the COTW (in Wikipedia time its May already), we have by request Rim Village Historic District and the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (AKA OMSI). Rim Village just needs some refinement to get to GA, while OMSI needs a lot of work in general. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Adios (on May 5th that is). Aboutmovies (talk) 04:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Award devices[edit]

Hello, I noticed your good work in making the award stars for military awards. They have been very helpful in templates that add them to ribbons. If you're able and willing, would you care to similarly tackle the E and S marksmanship devices, and the Coast Guard's "O" Device? If so, thank you! ~PescoSo saywe all 15:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portland Parks Photo Blitz![edit]

<font=3> Want something to do this weekend? I propose a WikiProject Oregon weekend photo blitz! Let's try to fill up the List of parks in Portland, Oregon as much as possible by getting out and taking our own pictures or finding ones online that can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The pictures uploaded will not only benefit the aforementioned list, but they will be used for future articles about specific parks and will fill up the Parks in Portland category over at Commons. Get your cameras ready!

--Another Believer (Talk) 21:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Hello, Lestatdelc/Archive 2! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited! Come Celebrate Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary![edit]

<font=3> You're invited to help celebrate Wikipedia's 10th anniversary! Visit this link for details. An informal celebration will take place at the AboutUs office located at 107 SE Washington Street, Suite 520 in Portland on Saturday, January 15, 2011. An Open Space Technology meeting is scheduled from 5pm to 7pm, with a party to follow. Admission is free!

--Another Believer (Talk) 17:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Template:Referendum approved with map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Template:Referendum rejected with map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WPORE COTW 2.0 - the picture edition[edit]

Greetings one and all. For some of you, this will be your first time receiving one of these messages, as it has been a year since the WikiProject Oregon Collaboration of the Week (COTW) was a regular thing. My hope is it gets back to being a regular thing.

Usually I would go over the past COTW, but we are basically starting out anew. So, without further adieu, this edition is our semi-annual picture drive. We usually try to do it when there is decent weather in the state, and today seems to fit the bill. Now although you are encouraged to go out and take pictures, you can also just search the internet for images that have the proper licensing and upload those. Flickr is one site that has a fair amount of content with the proper licensing (most images on Flickr are not compatible). See WP:COPYRIGHT in general. For some “free” sources, check out the our dormant subproject that has some links to sources.

Lastly, if you need to know what images we need, here are the requests. Please remove the request from the talk page if you add an image.

Finally (this is not image related), as the years have passed, we have lost many good editors, and others, like myself, are no longer in school or are working full-time or both, and thus are less active in the project. The project lives on, but it has created a bit of a power vacuum without a de facto cabal still around all the time. With that in mind, I encourage newer project members to step-up and fill some leadership type roles. Granted, we have no formal ruling junta or anything and no real defined roles, but there are many maintenance type tasks that some of us just took on to keep the project going. For instance, I ran the COTW, was pretty much the only one doing assessments, updating the portal, and even handing out the awards. I am sure others in the project can name what things they have done. The point being, that while I enjoyed those and still do some of those, I simply no longer have the free time to do all of it at a level that the project deserves. That said, I hope to start a discussion at WT:ORE where we can see if some newer editors would like to step-up and take on some of these tasks, which will hopefully make for a more inclusive project, and maybe get us back to the heyday of say 2008 when things were really rocking for WikiProject Oregon.

As always, please click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kari Chisholm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see the notability here. Looks more like a resume/promo page to me. Arbor8 (talk) 22:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arbor8 (talk) 22:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graf Zeppelin[edit]

Michael, can you comment on the origins of the article LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin which you created in 2004. From an initial reading of the first draft, it appears that you were identifying with a German airship as you used metric measurements/weights and noted that the name was a "foreign word." There is a date convention however, that was in place which is the M/D/Y that is more common to the United States as the "popular" style of dates and that is the sticking point now as the article has evolved. Recently a bot changed the dates in the article which has resulted in an editor making the assertion that the US-style should predominate, and has made the argument based on the article being created that way and that no case had been made for the topic to be more related to Germany. FWiW, here is the discussion Bzuk (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Texas's 5th congressional district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Coke, 5th Earl of Leicester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited! Wikipedia Takes Portland 2012[edit]

<font=3> You're invited to participate in Wikipedia Takes Portland 2012, an annual event which occurs each September in Portland, Oregon as part of Wikipedia Takes America and Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Photographing sites in Portland listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the main focus of Wikipedia Takes Portland. This year the event will kick off at Saturday, September 22nd at noon at Pioneer Courthouse Square. Currently, there are no formal plans--this is simply an opportunity to meet fellow Wikipedians before trekking around PDX to photograph sites on the Register. Not interested in coming downtown? You can still upload your images as part of the international photo competition. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work HERE (number of images uploaded, links to galleries, successes, feedback, etc. Click here for more information about meetups in Portland! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012 (Portland, Oregon)![edit]

<font=3>WIKIPEDIA LOVES LIBRARIES: MULTNOMAH COUNTY EDIT-ATHON!
You're invited to participate in Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012, an edit-athon hosted by Multnomah County Library for the purpose of improving stubs relating to Multnomah County. The event will take place on Saturday, October 27, 2012 from 2:00-4:00pm at the Central Library in downtown Portland. You can view details about this Wiki Loves Libraries event here. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work HERE.
Click here for more information about meetups in Portland! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]