User talk:Lemonaka/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Regarding Blood Stained Glory

Forgive me for asking, are there any guidelines finding that song quotes should be put only on wikiquote/wikisource? I couldn't find the source stating this and it seems that the primary issue is copyright. For example, pages linked below all have lyrics in them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Star_(1910_song) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_is_Good https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Cross_Buns_(song) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Internationale 130.132.173.99 (talk) 07:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:NOTLYRICS&WP:NOTQUOTE -Lemonaka‎ 07:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

It seems that the source you provided cuts a specific exception for shorter lyrics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Do_not_include_the_full_text_of_lengthy_primary_sources). Blood Stained Glory is significantly shorter than pieces likethe US national anthem not only in character count, but also in word count (if each Chinese character is counted as equivalent to an english word).

"If out of copyright, shorter texts – such as short speeches (the Gettysburg Address), short poems ("Ozymandias"), and short songs (most national anthems) – are usually included in their article. Longer texts are best summarised with the full text placed on Wikisource, or given as an external link." 130.132.173.99 (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Article assessments

Please could you review and fix your recent assessments, as they have introduced contradictory ratings. An article cannot be Stub-class and Disambig-class [1]. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

sure, please wait for a while, currently working in the hospital... -Lemonaka‎ 01:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Restoring biographical content

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Hello Lemonaka,

When restoring content to a biography of a living person, such as the article about Lacey Hull, you are responsible for your own actions and need to ensure that you are not blindly restoring badly sourced, contentious material.

Regarding "I need to revert" (Special:Diff/1206155996): As stated both in WP:BE and WP:BRV, even in response to sockpuppetry, When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. Also, creating an account while there is no block on the IP address, even if the account is used only for continuing an edit war previously done without an account, is not sockpuppetry unless more accounts are created or logged-out editing follows. Creating an account during a dispute and then sticking to that account is fine.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)