User talk:LeicaBlues/sandbox

Response[edit]

I agree with all of your points. Thank you for your review. Will be sure to implement these changes into the article.

LeicaBlues (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor comments[edit]

You've already made some useful contributions to this problematic article, and here are a few suggestions for more:

List notable examples of eyebars used in historic structures, e.g., other chain-link suspension spans noted in HAER documentation of the English Center Suspension Bridge
Research the most recent techniques used for steel eyebar fabrication: laser, plasma, or water-jet cutting of steel plate
Consolidate discussion of the Silver Bridge and reduce overlinking

Elizabeth Linden Rahway (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah's Peer Review[edit]

Eyebar: Lead Section: Satisfactory Shape: Could be renamed as 'Structure'. Also, this area lacks citations. Will need a Specification sheet with joinery details as a reference material that will talk about load transfers, strength and other properties. Applications: More information of private or public usage could be listed in detail with relevant citations and quoting examples. Fabrication: Can be elaborated further with Heat treatment a subset of fabrication rather than a separate heading. Assemble: There seems to be an overlap between the content is 'SHAPE' and "ASSEMBLY'. A single heading can explain both. References missing here too. Over all the article's essence has been maintained. Adding Advantages, Disadvantages and Material Properties, would be advantageous in make the article complete. Nagajyotsna (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]