User talk:Ldnresearch

Welcome!

Hello, Ldnresearch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The LDN Research Trust[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The LDN Research Trust, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bigonldn2010.com/2010/ldn-research-trust-46367. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The LDN Research Trust[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on The LDN Research Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of The LDN Research Trust and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dmol (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Ldnresearch, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ldnresearch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

sallydb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

From the answer below, this editor intends to continue to violate WP:COI and WP:PROMO. No valid reason therefore for name change. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If we let you change your username, you will not be allowed to recreate the article you previously made, nor edit on closely related subjects. What other subject do you want to write about? ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 11:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

appeal this block All Information held is from OUR website... The BIGON 2010 took the information FROM our site because we worked with them however the LDN Research Trust is our UK charity. Please re-instate our page. Check the information by going to the website. I am the Fundraising Director. Sally Darin-Brame http://ldnresearchtrust.org thank you

... and that makes it WP:COI - if there was true notability, it would be someone else who writes an article instead of a promo piece. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really am unsure what I am doing here, not having used the site before, and all I wanted was a reference to our charity on the Wikipedia site... So people can read about it, that was all. I have no intention of doing anything but putting the facts on. If you would like to review the information and edit out the bits that you find are non-compliant with Wiki and post that I am sure that will be fine. Once again I state The LDN Research Trust is a UK based registered Charity and only want to be recognised for this! Thank you sallydb

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ldnresearch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

This individual is completely unwilling to pay any attention to Wikipedia's policies, despite repeated opportunities and invitations; there's no point in continuing this. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Having an article in Wikipedia does not grant notability or recognition: the institution must be notable beforehand. In addition, any article needs 3rd party reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a directory. I just went and read the entire article: "we" is inappropriate. Fundraising efforts is inappropriate. I see nothing at all that is notable about the charity, even though it may have beneficial goals. You do not get recognition for being on Wikipedia, and if that's the goal, then WP:PROMOTE is clear - the article was horrifically self-promotional. Again, you are advised to read conflict of itnerest guidelines. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply... I do not understand how Wiki works... could I ask that you resend the original page to me so i may make the adjustments needed. many thanks (sallydarin-brame@hotmail.co.uk or sallydarin-brame@ldnresearchtrust.org) I apologise for not understanding, thank you

Since you have a conflict of interest, it wouldn't be appropriate for you to write about this subject- there's no 'adjustment' I could think of that would make it appropriate. Don't worry; if your organization is truly notable, then it's inevitable that people outside the organization will read about it in reliable independent sources and think it's interesting enough to write about- you don't have to lift a finger on Wikipedia, and can concentrate on the work you're doing with your organization. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, I will just leave it, and thank you for saying that you think is interesting enough to write about... I am passionate about it, it has saved my life. I am sorry I didnt fully understand your guidelines.thank you anyway