User talk:Lazy-restless

Proposed deletion of Atel

Collapsing years of threads to aid navigation

Welcome! Hello, Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Qatar TV, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: Starting an article Your first article Biographies of living persons How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dewritech (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the edit Intra language links however should be added at Wikidata. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Ah good, I see you have found how to do these. Wikidata keeps a separate record of your contributions there: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sharif_uddin – Fayenatic London 21:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Category:Death-636 Category:Death-636, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 29 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canakkale 1915, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 4 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hadithbd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Sources Sources must directly discuss the subject. Thus a story about the earth perhaps having two moons isn't a source for anything to do with the splitting of the moon or discussion among Muslims,which is why I removed it. See WP:NOR. Was 40 billions a typo? That's much more than what is considered to be the Age of the universe. Dougweller (talk) 10:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC) July 2014 You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page! Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves. If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. Dl2000 (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Dl2000 (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page! Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves. If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. Dl2000 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Dl2000 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Speedy delete nomination Speedy deletion nomination of Trimming (Beard) A tag has been placed on Trimming (Beard), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: This piece isn't nonsense, but it doesn't even reach WP:DICTIONARY Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 22:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC) License tagging for File:280px-Zero 4 (TV series).png Thanks for uploading File:280px-Zero 4 (TV series).png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 18 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zero4 (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mona, Lara and MBC 4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Meena cartoon.gif ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Meena cartoon.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC) Welcome! Hello, Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Bengali; did you know there is a Bengali Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Listening to reasons people give for reverting you Sharif uddin, surely you read why I reverted you here; I stated it clearly here. That does not mean that you then restore your edit without explaining why you restored your edit. See WP:BRD and WP:Edit warring. If you are one of those editors who is going to keep reverting without explaining why you are reverting, I will tell you right now that such an approach will not work. Such an approach serves to annoy me. Template:Sexual orientation very clearly states, "Before making any content changes, please discuss them on the talk page first." I suggest you follow that. Flyer22 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC) I appreciate that you've replied. Flyer22 (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks brother,,, Flyer22. :-) Sharif uddin (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) LOL, I'm female. Flyer22 (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Oh! sorry for my mistake :-D and thanks mam.! Sharif uddin (talk) 04:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Repost of Template:Abu Bakr A tag has been placed on Template:Abu Bakr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 23:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 23 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zee Salaam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC) December 2014 Hello, I'm Chris troutman. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Zakir Naik without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC) Zero4 (TV series) The series first aired on January 1 according to your article, but why not tell us what year that was? Hugo999 (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC) Is this a free image? Hello Sharif uddin, I just noticed you did an edit here[1]. Could I ask, are you sure this is a free image with no copyright restrictions. It has to be free source with the ability to use, modify and distribute it commercially as well? Please do let me know. If you find it is not, please undo your edit. Happy editing. Mbcap (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC) It is a non-free image and i have added the copyright tag in the image. Look over the image file. Sharif uddin (talk) 03:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Image tagging for File:Al-Sira Al-Nabawiyya (Ibn Kathir).jpg Thanks for uploading File:Al-Sira Al-Nabawiyya (Ibn Kathir).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 23 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ibn Battuta: The Animated Series, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Malay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 6 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI, French and Hijrah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 13 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 21 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Islamic films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Heaven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC) vote Invite A Barnstar! Please participate There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC) ratification of collage at Talk:Bengali people Hi, you previously voted in a poll at Talk:Bengali people to decide on whose pictures are to appear in a collage at Bengali people. The poll has now closed and a request for ratification of the final list has been sent out. If you wish to do so, please come to Talk:Bengali people thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 27 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangladesh Awami League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awami Muslim League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:VFX Making Of Omar series - 1.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:VFX Making Of Omar series - 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of M. A. Mannan The article M. A. Mannan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of The Security Printing Corporation (Bangladesh) Ltd. If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on The Security Printing Corporation (Bangladesh) Ltd., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melody Concertotalk 09:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC) If you believe this CSD nomination is in error, please click the blue button in the article and leave a message on it's talk page. Melody Concertotalk 09:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC) I will not delete the template and neither should you. You should explain on the article talk page why it shouldn't be deleted. Melody Concertotalk 09:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations You reinstate that material again, and you risk being blocked for disruption.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC) SPI Please follow the instructions at the top, where it says "How to open an investigation". Alakzi (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Reference errors on 13 August Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the Zina page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Zina Please join the discussion at Talk:Zina before reverting again. Thanks. --NeilN talk to me 13:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC) {{unblock|Plz unblock me. I am not any sock puppet, I request to check my account to be sure of it. [[User:Sharif uddin|Sharif uddin]] ([[User talk:Sharif uddin#top|talk]]) 15:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)}} This account is not directly blocked. What message appears when you attempt to edit? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC) It was showing problem several hours ago. But now it's okay. Sharif uddin (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 12 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deepto TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Deepto TV logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Deepto TV logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 31 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rishtey (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Mail Hello, Lazy-restless. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC) WP:Hatnotes Sharif uddin, I reverted you here and here because, per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes, this is not the way we do hatnotes. Did you read Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes? The hatnotes you added are not needed in this case and/or the links are found lower in the article (for example, the lead of the article is already clear that the article is about coitus; the article is also about more than coitus because sexual intercourse has different definitions). You often revert and WP:Edit war without listening. If you see the #Listening to reasons people give for reverting you section above, I addressed that aspect of your editing before. If you don't understand what I am trying to state about something, then ask instead of edit war. For example, you can ask here in this section on your talk page if you don't understand what I mean about hatnote usage. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Pardon for my misbehave. But in my opinion, at least the link of sex (disambiguation) should be kept above. Above all, the page deserves to have the disambiguation link for its highly importance. Sharif uddin (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Different definitions of sexual intercourse are handled in the article; readers do not need to be pointed to the Sex (disambiguation) page at the Sexual intercourse article. The Sex article was already linked in the Sexual intercourse article, which is another reason why your hatnote is not needed. The term "sexual intercourse" is disambiguated. The Sex (disambiguation) hatnote fits at the top of Sex article, where it currently is, because "sex" is not disambiguated. I don't think you took the time to read Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC) There are many links about sexual activity and etcetera in the page but i didn't find any particular link with the page sex in the page. Sharif uddin (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC) It used to be linked, but it was delinked because that definition of sex is not the one the Sexual intercourse article is about. But this is beside the point. The other stuff I stated above are the main points. Your hatnote states, "This page is about coitus. For the biological study of sex in sexually reproduced organisms, see Sex. For other uses, see Sex (disambiguation)." The first reason that hatnote does not belong is because people are already told that the article is about coitus in the very first sentence of the WP:Lead. The second reason that hatnote does not belong is because the article is not solely about the coitus definition of sexual intercourse. The third reason that hatnote does not belong is because people are not coming to that article for the biological definition of sex (as in what is a male or a female). Also, we do not need two hatnotes. And the Sex (disambiguation) link covers the other definitions of sex anyway; really, that is only link you added to the article that I can see as beneficial. I can compromise with you on the Sex (disambiguation) link, but, in my opinion, it also is not needed for that article. My compromise suggestion is that you use the following hatnote instead: This article is primarily about humans. For other animals, see Animal sexual behaviour. For other uses, see Sex (disambiguation). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Ok done. That's gonna be a good consensus. Sharif uddin (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC) We're set then. But in the future, keep in mind that such pages that are already disambiguated do not need a note at the top telling readers about other uses. The fourth reason the Sex (disambiguation) link doesn't belong in this case ties into the number three reason above. The non-disambiguated Sex page is what needs that hatnote since its title is "Sex" and there are many different definitions of sex. So the "For other uses" aspect fits there; it doesn't quite fit at the Sexual intercourse article because the Sex (disambiguation) link is about other definitions of sex/other topics titled "sex," not other definitions of sexual intercourse/other topics titled "sexual intercourse." The other definitions of sexual intercourse are in the Sexual intercourse article, where they should be, per WP:Broad-concept article. For more on what I mean, see this recent discussion about disambiguation. On a side note: Did you get my email? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Hmm, but I thought it should be better to communicate through wiki. By the way, many many thanks for the consensus. :D Sharif uddin (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Sharif uddin, this is another misuse of hatnotes. Homo (disambiguation) is not about other uses of "homosexuality." It's not needed at the Homosexuality article. It's needed at the Homo article, where it already is. So that addition should be removed from the Homosexuality article. You don't seem to have understood what I stated about how hatnotes are used. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Communicating So I take it you read the email? Or is your email address not working? I didn't feel that what I contacted you about via email needed discussion on Wikipedia. It was more so about addressing our editing styles and how I appreciate your work, but that communication with you is difficult. For example, you will make a lot edits to an article, a number of which I or others disagree with, or which go against established WP:Consensus, and you will often keep making the edits when reverted instead of stopping and discussing the matter on the article talk page. It always takes someone else to start the discussion first. And when you strongly believe in an edit, you feel that your edit must stay even when there are valid reasons given for why it should not. You barely use edit summaries. If you start making a lot of edits to the Homosexuality article, for example, I'm sure I and others would disagree with a lot of your changes. In that case, if I were to revert some things, you might let me revert a few things, but not others. And you won't explain unless the matter is brought to your talk page or to the article talk page with a WP:Ping for your username. That is frustrating, especially if a layout has already been thoroughly worked out and you are changing it without discussion. I felt that communication with you via email might be easier. I am fine with most of your changes to the Heterosexuality article thus far, though. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC) In our country, wikipedia browsing is free of cost in many mobile operator, but not the Gmail or yahoo ha ha ha. Most of our people try to save money because of their middle income. That's one of the causes for which I preferred Wiki for discussing. Sharif uddin (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Okay, but you still haven't addressed my concerns above. Others have the same concerns about how you edit. For example, the #Stop edit warring section that Jeppiz posted above. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Okay, man. Next time I won't do any random adit without others consensus. Oh God, Help me. Sharif uddin (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 24 January Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the Heterosexuality page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 28 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belief (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oprah Winfrey Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC) interwiki link You added an interwiki link to Jatiya Rakkhi Bahini. Interwiki links no long go into the articles. Interwikilinks are added in Wikidata and the link you added was already in Wikidata. Bgwhite (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 11 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atv and MBC1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC) Moving articles Do not move contentious articles like you did in this case. Like WP:Requested moves makes clear, you should propose a move via that process in the case of moves that are likely to be contested. The term you added is not only not the WP:Common name of the subject, I don't see where it's used in WP:Reliable sources. So I have reverted you on the move and the wording in the lead. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sexual orientation change efforts into Heterosexuality. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Diannaa, thanks for that. I'm not sure how you came across Since Sharif uddin's copying tendency, but since Sharif uddin copies a lot of material from article to article, usually material that he did not write, I was going to note to him sometime today to see WP:Copying within Wikipedia and to follow it (per what is stated at Shootingstar88's talk page). Sharif uddin, if you wrote the material, giving attribution in the edit summary is not needed. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC) @Flyer22 Reborn: The material appeared on the bot report User:EranBot/Copyright/rc. It's best if all copying within Wikipedia has an edit summary providing attribution, so that patrolling admins will know where the material came from, and will not have to hunt through the history of the source article to find out who wrote it. — Diannaa (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC) The reason for those reverts You may want to familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style, particularly regarding See Also links. Specifically, "The links in the See also section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number." The television show you were linking sounds interesting, but it really is not relevant to those articles. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 01:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC) The article was not about the television show (Metrosexuality), but rather than a term (Metrosexual). Sharif uddin (talk) 01:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC) The links are of questionable relevance even so. Please stop restoring them without discussion. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC) But it is unquestionable that it is relevant with heterosexuality. Therefore in case of the article heterosexuality only, I will revert it. Sharif uddin (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 25) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sharif uddin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Hello! Sharif uddin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 26 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic Voice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC) WP:Edit warring How many times do you have to be warned for WP:Edit warring before you get the point? It's gotten to where I am tempted to report your persistent edit warring behavior at WP:ANI. I already explained to you that this is redundant. It is not needed in the least. Now you can revert yourself on it, or it will be removed via consensus when I bring other editors into the matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC) I prefer bringing other editors into the matter to get a consensus. You can proceed on. An article can have both underlying template end opening sidebar template on the subject matter. There is no offense or violation of policy in it. Sharif uddin (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC) I took the matter to the talk page and to WP:Med. As for "offense or violation," the offense or violation is your propensity toward edit warring. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC) And once again, more edit warring after a guideline was clearly explained to you. You did the same yesterday at the Homosexuality article, and stopped only after you were reverted by Jytdog. You were also edit warring with Jytdog elsewhere. I don't know why you think the rules do not apply to you, but if you keep editing like this, I will indeed make a case on you at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Because of this, other edit warring issues noted in your talk page's edit history, and what I stated in the #Communicating section above, I will report you when I get the time to write up a case on you. That should be in two or three days since I'm very busy lately. In the meantime, you should think on what you want to state in the WP:ANI case. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC) It's taking longer than expected for me to start the case, but that's because I'm waiting for a current WP:ANI case I'm involved in to clear out first. After that, I will start a case on your edit warring since I feel this really needs to be addressed by the community. You simply revert, usually without giving any valid explanation and expect not to be reverted in turn. If you are reverted in turn, with a valid explanation as to why, you simply revert again and think the case is supposed to be settled there. Editors are left not wanting to repeatedly revert you because of fear of edit warring themselves and/or being blocked for it. You go about your way, and your edit remains unless there is more than one editor there to revert you. And this needs to stop. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 21 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homosexuality and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brotherly love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Peacetvbanglalogo2.jpeg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Peacetvbanglalogo2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC) Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Islamic sexual jurisprudence into Zina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This is your second warning for this problem. Please start providing the required attribution, or you could be facing a block for copyright violations. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC) I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 31 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic sexual jurisprudence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asexual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 9 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Bab Al-Hara season 6.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Bab Al-Hara season 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia and copyright Hello Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Gümüş (TV series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC) June 2016 Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: {{double image|right|Anisogamy.svg|114|Isogamy.svg|120|Different forms of [[anisogamy]]:<br>A) anisogamy of motile cells, B) oogamy (egg cell and sperm cell), C) anisogamy of non-motile cells (egg cell and spermatia).|Different forms of isogamy:<br>A) isogamy of [[motile cell]]s, B) isogamy of non-motile cells, C) conjugation.}} It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Template: Sex (biology) and Template:Sex (biology) sidebar Your templates do not belong on every sex article possible. And adding both to an article is highly redundant and therefore overkill. One of them is enough. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC) This article is an example of where your template does not fit (despite the way you've crafted the template to try and make it fit). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Moving templates, and cut and paste moves Per WP:Requested moves, just like moving articles should be discussed first before the move happens, if the move is likely to be contested, so should moving templates. Moving templates you recently created is one thing, but moving long-standing templates is another. I don't know what you thought you were doing with Template:Human sexuality and Template:Human sexuality and sexology, but besides having created more redundancy, you ended up doing a cut and paste move; such moves are a no; this is because cut and paste moves lose the edit history of the page. The edit history of Template:Human sexuality only shows you now, while the talk page shows a longer history. So now I will list those two moves at WP:Requested moves and request a WP:Histmerge. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Taken to Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Stop your WP:Disruptive editing Stop this and the other WP:Disruptive editing you engage in, or I will finally be taking you to WP:ANI. I am beyond tired of your edits messing up a number of our articles. We go by WP:Consensus here, not you forcing whatever change you want on our articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Flyer22 Reborn, I think that merging the history is a better decision for that because every article and template of wikipedia should be a clear title which will represent the central subject of the matter. What is your opinion? Sharif uddin (talk) 02:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC) And you hardly ever discuss; you just do what you want and WP:Edit war over it, and I'm tired of that. I'm having those pages moved back. If you really want to discuss, you will bring the matter up on one of the talk pages and centralize the discussion (per WP:TALKCENT) after they are moved back. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Flyer22 Reborn, check in the talk page of the sex template, I gave a message about that but no one paid heed. Sharif uddin (talk) 03:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC) This is a suggestion, not a discussion. No answer does not mean that you should then go ahead move the template. If you want something like that moved, you are supposed to make sure that you bring a number of editors in to discuss the matter; that is what WP:Requested moves is for. I also reverted this disruptive blanking. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC) I appreciate you attempting to discuss things like you did here. Thank you. As noted in the #Communicating section above, that is the main thing I'm looking for from you when you edit. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC) See here and here. That's the WP:Consensus. You should not then try to circumvent the consensus, as you did here and here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC) And in case you want to point out that there was no consensus, "no consensus" is also a part of the WP:Consensus policy; see WP:NOCONSENSUS. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 3 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijrah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Why I have been blocked? Decline reason: Technical decline - you have been editing since this request, so you are clearly not blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Hi. This account is not directly blocked. Can you please tell us what it says when you try to edit? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 11 July Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: On the Zakir Naik page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC) July 2016 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zakir Naik. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. It appears that you've been warned about your behavior multiple times in the past and are continuing this now around this article and those related to Peace TV —SpacemanSpiff 16:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Template merger Hello Sharif – regarding your requesto to merge the templates, this appears to have already been done, because Template:Human sexuality already redirects to Template:Sex. In any case the Merger Requests page is for articles only – requests to merge templates or categories are done via a different process. Richard3120 (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Richard3120, also see what I stated above. This merger appears to be Sharif uddin's latest attempt to sidestep a previous discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Sharif uddin, you were already warned above. If this and this happens again, I will be starting that long overdue case on you at WP:ANI, or perhaps, since your edit warring needs a case to itself, I'll just focus on this template case. I reiterate "You should not then try to circumvent the consensus." WP:Consensus is policy. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Zakir Naik Dear Sharif uddin, Your edits (or tweaks!) on the Zakir Naik page is of little help to the article. Kindly avoid unnecessary changes. Sentences are often framed in coherence with the source but with a sense of neutrality. It appears as if you want to dampen the content with insignificant changes in choice of words. As you may be knowing that the burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores material. In case of WP:BLP, Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources. I hope you get the point. Feel free to discuss on this matter. – Anand2202 (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Note This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date. Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. --NeilN talk to me 16:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC) During the past few hours, there has been an edit war within me and Anand2202 about the article of Zakir Naik but now it's ok probably by mutual understanding of editing except making the radical as extremist, about which I will talk in the article's talk page.So I can assure you that now there is no probability of edit war. Sharif uddin (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 23 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zakir Naik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical Islamism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Template:Human sexuality and Template:Sex Your many attempts to change these templates in significant ways are becoming extraordinarily disruptive. After your requested move failed, you edit-warred at {{Human sexuality}} to redirect it to {{Sex}}. After that didn't work, you listed the template to be merged at WP:TFD/H, apparently attempting to trick an uninvolved editor into merging it for you. When that didn't work, you opened a TfD with no rationale and without placing an appropriate notice on the affected templates. As Flyer22 Reborn attempted to explain to you above, you've discussed the changes you want made, and the community rejected them. Consider this your final warning to accept the community's decision and walk away. If you continue attempting to shop around for different venues or push your changes through using deception or brute force, you will be blocked. Your disruption is rapidly exhausting the community's patience. ~ Rob13Talk 01:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 30 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transgender people and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Sharif Uddin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kalki Avtar aur Muhammad sahib cover.jpeg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kalki Avtar aur Muhammad sahib cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Rokomari.com Template:Rokomari.com has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:The 100 Cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:The 100 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Category:Video games related to Islam has been nominated for discussion Category:Video games related to Islam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:16, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Walid Saif The article Walid Saif has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 22:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Help! I have been blocked This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Sharif Uddin (talk) 07:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: I'm afraid we can't do anything about a block on an IP address unless you tell us what IP address it is. Please post a new unblock request giving us that information, which will be given in the message you see when you try to edit. Alternatively, if for any reason you prefer not to make your IP address publicly visible, you can request an unblock through the Unblock Ticket Request System. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Help! I have been blocked {{unblock| 1=Caught by an open proxy block of IP 2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 but this host or IP is not an open proxy. [[User:Sharif Uddin|Sharif Uddin]] ([[User talk:Sharif Uddin#top|talk]]) 22:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)}} This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Caught by an open proxy block of IP 2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Sharif Uddin (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: Yes it is: it's a FaceBook proxy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Please don't have more than one unblock request open at a time. Doing so serves no useful purpose at all, and simply wastes the time of the administrator who has to close them all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC) Advice and guidance Hi I have noticed that you have some knowledge on Islamic topics. I was wondering if you could add some balance to this article [2] at the moment its a propaganda piece for the Shia school of thought which misrepresent Sunni sources and outright lie about whats stated in these sources could you kindly help out? 2A02:C7D:151D:D100:D589:108:C39E:9261 (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Help! I have been blocked {{unblock| 1=Caught by an open proxy block of IP 2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 once again but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I don't understand why I have to assure it to the authority again and again, I don't have any hostility with anyone. So why this to me? [[User:Sharif Uddin|Sharif Uddin]] ([[User talk:Sharif Uddin#top|talk]]) 08:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)}} I neutralized your second unblock request. Please, do not post new unblock requests while the previous one is still pending. This has nothing to do with you personally. This is about IP address you are using. Please, be patient. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC) I just noticed that yesterday, after posting the unblock request you made an edit here. Are you sure you are blocked? Vanjagenije (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Zee salaam old logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Zee salaam old logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, Sharif Uddin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Template:Human sexuality and Template:Sex again Despite what was stated by BU Rob13 at #Template:Human sexuality and Template:Sex above, you have done it yet again, all this time later. BU Rob13, what should be done now? Another warning? A block? Reporting this editor at WP:ANI (which I have threatened to do times before)? As can be seen by the number of warnings I and others have given this editor above, this editor is not a net positive. NeilN, any thoughts about how to proceed? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Sharif Uddin, are you going to be doing that again? --NeilN talk to me 20:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Actually two years ago, I replaced sex template with human sexuality template in all the link articles of sex template. Yesterday I tried to restore all but there was a lot of articles to be re-edited, besides I don't know how to use a bot to edit in a less time. So I thought it might be easy for me to redirect the article. Hence,I did that. If anyone help me to replace the template in those article with or without a bot, it will be fruitful for me. I am sorry for all of your disturbance. Sharif Uddin (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I'm not sure what you mean. You have repeatedly tried to get rid of Template:Human sexuality. Again, see what BU Rob13 stated above. This link shows you trying to get rid of Template:Human sexuality again. You then went to articles removing Template:Human sexuality and replacing it with Template:Sex, as seen, for example, here and here. I reverted you on those changes as well. And I really don't have anything else to state about your disruptive editing; your talk page has multiple sections showing my opinion on that. As far as I'm concerned, the warning that BU Rob13 gave you in 2016 is not stale, but it seems he feels that it is. Either way, there are other admins who would be willing to take over. I'm not sure why I never reported you at WP:ANI years ago (I certainly threatened to do so enough times), but I'm sure it will happen eventually (and without a warning since I've warned you enough). Thanks, NeilN. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I’ve just been busy. I was quite clear that you weren’t to try to sneak in your changes again what with the clear consensus against. You’ve done it again. I’ve blocked you for 31 hours. ~ Rob13Talk 22:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC) BU Rob13 and NeilN, take a look at Sharif Uddin's latest edits. He is at it again, this time replacing Template:Human sexuality with Template:Sex at a number of articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC) All those articles which I replaced were previously the link article of sex template. I never replaced the template of human sexuality template, and I think you are randomly trying to make the administrators and users angry against me without describing the matter clearly. A user can not expect such a behaviour from an adminstrator like you. We don't want to be a victim of any adminstrator's such a rough behaviour. Sharif Uddin (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC) You were replacing Template:Human sexuality. You were trading it out for Template:Sex. Like I stated on my talk page, "If you were not trying to get rid of one of the templates and were truly trying to improve the articles, I wouldn't be as concerned. Some of the articles may very well be more compatible with one template over the other, but you have shown time again that you are more interested in getting rid of one of the templates when it comes to these two templates." I am not an administrator. And who is "we"? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC) There are a lot of articles where two of this templates exists. You can see that I never replaced two of these templates but only one See here. And saying we, I meant on behalf of all the users you are harrasing off. Sharif Uddin (talk) 11:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Admins may be slow sometimes, but we do know how to read a contributions history. [3], [4], etc. --NeilN talk to me 13:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC) NeilN, BU Rob13, let me describe myself. Two years ago when I tried to merge the template sex with template human sexuality, I myself replaced the template sex with the template human sexuality in all the link articles of sex template. See here. But then no one roll backed it and finally the Marge proposal was rejected by community and still after that the human sexuality template is remaining here. So I tried to take the articles back in the previous state. Though I again tried to redirect the template human sexuality for saving time and it was not right but changing templates in articles was not a wrong decision. I hope you all would understand and consider my matter and take back my block. Sharif Uddin (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC) @Sharif Uddin: I can't remember exactly when and why I watchlisted your page. But as it has been in my watchlist for a pretty long time, so have I been watching some of your stories. I once saw you doing some funny things like uploading bizarre images (well, they had been deleted long ago); and I have been persistently seeing your persistent obsession with these sex templates. I exactly don't know whether it is your amateurish approach or your unconscious fascination that time and again hypnotize you and make you run behind these templates. But whatever it is, please see that you are persistently becoming a cause of pain for other community members. I've never seriously looked at those edits or templates, but the repeated frustration expressed by Flyer22 and others make it clear that you are operating in a wrong way. When others' days of constructive hard-work are messed up, I think this becomes a grave issue. In case you can't realize how disruptive you are becoming and continue this way, I propose for longer bans, not as penalty, but to minimize disruption. Spending some more time in dreamland? or coming back now? Okay, take it easy. Accept what others are saying to you, and gradually try to reconcile with them. There are other fields where you can contribute -AsceticRosé 05:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC). February 2018 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 13:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 21 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atel (slang), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arjun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Participation banking If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Participation banking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.turkiyefinans.com.tr/en-us/about-us/participation-banking-system/how-does-participation-banking-operate/pages/how-does-participation-banking-operate.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC) A page you started (Atel (slang)) has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Atel (slang), Sharif Uddin! Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: An interesting article To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Ghazwatul Hind listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ghazwatul Hind. Since you had some involvement with the Ghazwatul Hind redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC) {{Animal sexual behavior}} {{Animal sexual behavior}} is not meant for human articles. If you think its appropriate for an human article, please seek consensus on the article talk page first. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC) ANI notice There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC) It appears that the template is okay to use on human-related articles, but please know that when someone such as FlightTime leaves you a message to express concerns regarding edits that you're making - it's good etiquette and generally expected that you at least acknowledge their message, respond, and try to work with the user to address their concerns and make sure all is okay. Don't ignore their messages and keep making the same edits in concern - that's bad etiquette and generally not in compliance with how we resolve concerns and issues here. If you have questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to leave me a message. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC) thank you both for reaching to a positive consensus about my edits. Hope I shall and can co-operate with users like me about related edits as far and fast as possible, more frequenty and easily from now and in future. Thanks again to both of you. Sharif Uddin (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Sharif Uddin - No problem ;-). Keep up the good work, and please don't hesitate to reach out to one of us if you run into any questions or need help with anything. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Ditto. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Replied here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Sharif Uddin - I'm just letting you know that a user has raised concerns and objections regarding the use of the template on human-related articles in the ANI report here. Because of this, I've re-opened the discussion. If you can, please do participate in the discussion there so we can resolve the matter and help you with what you're trying to edit. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 9 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic sexual jurisprudence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibn Hajar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC) File:420px-Vlcsnap-2017-07-16-17h47m43s747-2.png Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter message Hello, Sharif Uddin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Ways to improve Fahisha Thanks for creating Fahisha. A New Page Patroller Slatersteven just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you: Not sure the only sources is an RS. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Slatersteven (talk) 14:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC) January 2019 Your addition to Islamic sexual jurisprudence has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Please leave edit summaries Your edits consistently lack edit summaries, making them harder to verify, especially when you're making repeated or bulk-size edits. Please read WP:FIES for basic instructions on how fulfill ES. Thank you! DA1 (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Atel (slang) The article Atel (slang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: The article falls under WP:DEL14, that is WP:NOT#DICT #3. Aside form citation 1 which delves into the term, and citation 3 which is a dictionary link; the rest of the citations and most of the article is anecdotal examples of the term in use and not descriptive or encyclopedic. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DA1 (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC) A page you started (Haya (Islam)) has been reviewed! Thanks for creating Haya (Islam). I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that: While the article can include quotations from Quran and hadiths, the article would be better expanded with sections on the practical interpretations and applications of haya. On an unrelated note, you don't need to add 5 citations to a single claim; you almost never need more than one citation per claim, unless it's particularly controversial or of the form "multiple sources say X" To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. signed, Rosguill talk 19:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Islamic family jurisprudence The article Islamic family jurisprudence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No references. Little more than a dictionary definition, does not provide adequate information. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC) I have moved this article to draftspace so that improvements to the tone and sourcing can be carried out. You can continue to edit it at Draft:Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Hassan Hussain TV show.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Hassan Hussain TV show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Khaybar-TV Show.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Khaybar-TV Show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 3 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yunus Emre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TRT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 24 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic sexual jurisprudence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibn Hajar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 26 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic sexual jurisprudence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercourse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC) Copying licensed material requires attribution (3rd request) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Islamic views on oral sex into Zina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:The 100 book Cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:The 100 book Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:The 100 book Cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:The 100 book Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 16 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homosexuality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Judaism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC) August 2019 Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC) Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lazy-restless reported by User:Crossroads1 (Result: ). Thank you. -Crossroads- (talk) 21:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Block You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 01:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Important Notice This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Doug Weller talk 18:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Xq28 Hello Sharif, I've made a correction to your summary of the findings of the recent "no gay gene study" on the Xq28 page. You appeared to have taken the liberty to interpret the study beyond the factors it actually studied and added implications from the results which aren't reflective of the reality of the result, mainly in suggesting "sexual orientation is hardly based on genetic factors". The study in question suggests pretty much exactly the opposite: There is statistically significant basis to suggest multiple Loci are partially causal to homosexuality. As such it appears you did not (properly) read the material you've talked about and cited. I urge you to, in the future, when making edits on wikipedia to take more care in making sure you understand the material you are writing about before making an edit to a page. V60club (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2019 (UTC) September 2019 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Comilla University, you may be blocked from editing. PepperBeast (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 5 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tazkiah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC) New section ہیلو دوست۔ آپ کا شکریہ کہ آپ نے وکیپیڈیا آرٹیکلز فار ڈیلیشن میں کالکی اوتار کے آرٹیکل کیلئے آتھینٹک سورسز مہیا کئے ہیں۔ اللّہ تعالیٰ آپ کو جزائے خیر عطا فرمائے آمین۔ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.191.4.75 (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC) Zazakallah Khairan brother. Lazy-restless 05:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC) October 2019 The article Atel has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Disambiguation link notification for October 16 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalki Avatar and Muhammad (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kalki Avatar and Muhammad (book). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 23 An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalki Avatar and Muhammad (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Savitri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Haq Vidyarthi (October 27) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Haq Vidyarthi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Haq Vidyarthi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad book cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Message This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Apparently you are trying hard for last 6 years to promote a blatant hoax on Wikipedia that Muhammad was well predicted in Hindu scriptures and should be already accepted as the prophet. Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX and you are frequently finding ways to promote these same recently created debunked theories. I would recommend you to find another subject to edit. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC) @Aman.kumar.goel:, I have not broken any policy, I submitted the article Draft:Muhammad and Hindu scriptures as a draft, and it is not in my or your hand wheather the article will be accepted in the submission or not, it will be checked out by respective reviewer according to rules. Lazy-restless 09:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad book cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC) Muhammad and the Hindu texts moved to draftspace An article you recently created, Muhammad and the Hindu texts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Lazy-restless: Please try to find peer-reviewed reliable sources, preferably mainstream academic scholarship, such as the Rowena Robinson Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings source you did cite. Missionary publications, self-published sources, advocacy groups with no independent peer-review process, websites, blogs and other questionable sources are not okay for wikipedia articles. Please avoid such sources in this and other articles of wikipedia. When you do find sources such as Robinson, please summarize the source fairly and per our NPOV guideline. Your last version did not. Your cooperation is requested, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Bharatiya29 18:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiens Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Prophecy of Muhammad in Atharvaveda claimed by ISKON Bangladesh journal.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Prophecy of Muhammad in Atharvaveda claimed by ISKON Bangladesh journal.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prophecy of Muhammad in Atharvaveda claimed by ISKON Bangladesh journal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prophecy of Muhammad in Atharvaveda claimed by ISKON Bangladesh journal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) , 18 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

When the ANI was going on, I just looked once the message of ANI, then now after blocking, I found that many times i was pinged, but there was no message on my notification, for that, I did not see the discussion and get any chance to prove or confess myself, I love wikipedia, if I am given chance, I will reform and improve myself, and every man do mistakes, but when a man is alive, there is chance to reform. I politely seeking pardon and a chance to reform. I knew that, Userflyer22reborn was indefinitely blocked in 2008 but after reforming discussion, he/she again also came back. Can I have also a similar chance please? -- Lazy-restless 05:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've been blocked three times in the past for very similar reasons. What is different this time? Furthermore, you have been warned multiple times about copyright, so you should demonstrate an adequate understanding of the copyright policy (What is copyright? When is it appropriate to copy stuff from external websites into Wikipedia?) in order to be unblocked. MER-C 09:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I saw what you said, Lazy--that was not appropriate. You can email Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team, if you are able to compose a decent unblock request. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Lazy-restless, I have closed the ANI request regarding you. There is consensus that should you be unblocked, you will be subjected to an indefinite topic ban from (1) the subject of religion and (2) the subject of sexuality - broadly construed for both subjects. You may appeal at WP:AN against your topic ban. My personal suggestion is that you do not appeal before six months of good editing. starship.paint (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

To repeat something I stated before: I was not blocked in 2008 and my circumstance was completely different than Lazy-restless's. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Muhammad and the Hindu texts concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Muhammad and the Hindu texts, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30308

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #30308 was submitted on 2020-04-25 19:43:18. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 12:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

reiterating the close of the ANI thread.

There is consensus that should Lazy-restless be unblocked, they will be subjected to an indefinite topic ban from (1) the subject of religion and (2) the subject of sexuality - broadly construed for both subjects. (non-admin closure) starship.paint (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

I have added fuller unblock conditions in my UTRS reply.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 12:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad and Buddhist scriptures

Hello, Lazy-restless. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad and Buddhist scriptures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30408

UTRS # 30408 was submitted on 2020-05-26 09:26:47 . This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Carrying over for transparency--

Im sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. You will not be allowed to edit about religion and sexuality per the ANI discussion. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=927675561#Lazy-restless} To wit-- "There is consensus that should Lazy-restless be unblocked, they will be subjected to an indefinite topic ban from (1) the subject of religion and (2) the subject of sexuality - broadly construed for both subjects." Please describe what constructive edits you would make and how you wiould address previous problems.
Please read the following pages and tell us how you would avoid problems in your edting--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_battleground
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quotations#Overuse
Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) -

Thanks, --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra

Category:Arabic films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Arabic films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ATN Islamic TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ATN Islamic TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATN Islamic TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ATN Islamic TV Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ATN Islamic TV Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Darussalam Publishers logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Darussalam Publishers logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad and the Hindu texts

Hello, Lazy-restless. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad and the Hindu texts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Payitaht- Abdülhamid poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Payitaht- Abdülhamid poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MBC Bollywood logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MBC Bollywood logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kanal7 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kanal7 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peace TV logo 2015.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peace TV logo 2015.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peace TV urdu logo 2015.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peace TV urdu logo 2015.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Sira Al-Nabawiyya (Ibn Kathir).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Sira Al-Nabawiyya (Ibn Kathir).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meena cartoon.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meena cartoon.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamqa logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamqa logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Intellectualism

Template:Intellectualism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. - car chasm (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheSecurityPrintingCorporation(Bangladesh)LtdLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheSecurityPrintingCorporation(Bangladesh)LtdLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamic Foundation Bangladesh Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamic Foundation Bangladesh Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peacetvbanglalogo2.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peacetvbanglalogo2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)