User talk:Laszlohajdu

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Laszlohajdu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Reiprocal Field Theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reiprocal Field Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reiprocal Field Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crowsnest (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Reiprocal Field Theory, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Crowsnest (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Original research

Hello Laszlohajdu. It appears you do not understand the function of Wikipedia, which is an online encyclopaedia, so condensing what has already been published elsewhere. Including original research on science subjects which has been published in academic journals, and has made a certain impact, provable through secondary sources discussing it. Wikipedia is not for publishing original research. Best regards, and happy editing, Crowsnest (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

If you want to pre-print your results, or the draft paper to be submitted to a scientific journal, you can use ArXiv. -- Crowsnest (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)