User talk:LadyofShalott/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SatyrBot[edit]

Hi, Aleta! I've been working to improve SatyrBot's functioning, and I wanted to ask you two things:

  1. Has the bot been working okay on new page tagging within the past week? Did you notice it's work on Saturday, and did it do alright?
  2. Would you take a look at the offering page I've put together to "advertise" to other WikiProjects?

Many thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRC[edit]

A bunch of us are on IRC right now. Join us if you can. The link is in the September archive. Jeffpw 22:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant quotes from the citations pasted, etc. (Sister Roma)[edit]

Dear Aleta, please allow me to copy and paste what appears in the references cited, and what appears in the text. You can compare the two and see for yourself that what the anon has been saying all along is true: (1) text: "She is one of the best known members of the group with many believing she is likely the most visible" -- and the reference: "...which included Sister Roma, one of the Sisters' most well known members..." Saying "one of the best known" is not the same as "most well known." And there is no mention of "likely the most visible" in either reference. (2) text: "In 1991 Roma introduced the STOP the Violence Campaign to combat hate crimes throughout the city as well as on college campuses" -- and the reference: "Back home in San Francisco, Sister Roma! introduced her STOP the Violence Campaign in reaction to the rise of violence in the streets, especially hate crimes" and "The Order distributed window signs and whistles in the various neighborhoods and districts of the city as well as on college campuses." As written, the text says that the campaign was introduced to combat hate crime throughout the city *as well as on college campuses*, but the reference states the campaign was introduced *in reaction to* the rise of violence -- and later, that the Order distributed signs and whistles in neighborhoods and districts *as well as on college campuses*. Nowhere does the reference assert that hate crimes were being "combatted" in *both* the city *and* college campuses. Can you see the differences now? Can you see the anon was correct in what he has been saying? If you or anybody else cannot tell the differences, then you or they are in the wrong (volunteer) business. Thanks for your time. Pass the word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.81.121 (talk) 00:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply about userpage vandalism[edit]

No problem! I saw what seemed to be a relatively experienced (and fine) user who all of the sudden decided to vandalize...I checked out his other recent edits and saw a few other vandal edits that had gone unnoticed.   jj137 (Talk) 22:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter[edit]

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

So?[edit]

you like? And thank you for the copyedit. I just bang on the keyboard and hope for the best! Jeffpw 23:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, yes. Miss Julie is talented at taking the workings of the project and summarizing them in an amusing manner. You are most welcome! I took you at your word last month that such edits would be appreciated. :) Aleta 23:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject newsletter[edit]

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Request[edit]

Could you please include your thoughts at the following request for comment: Talk:Peter Yarrow#RfC: Conviction and pardon. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkp212 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fib (poetry)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fib (poetry), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fib (poetry). Thank you. TheRingess (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Peter Yarrow Discussion page[edit]

Would you please rejoin the conversation at the Peter Yarrow discussion page. Your input would be helpful David in DC (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now John c and a transparent sock puppet are wheel warring the edits into the article. I don't want to violate 3RR, so I've requested protection. Any help you can provide would be welcome.David in DC (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Novels WikiProject[edit]

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Truly Thank You & God bless You 'Angel Aleta' to guard my pages[edit]

Naresh Sonee & Brhmaand Pujan I have gone through your pages of interest. Yes you indeed proved that you believe in 'world wide voice' & Unitarian Universalism justice. Certainly, how come some of you pop up on pages with your instinctual positive approach on 'lone left out insecure pages' and godly interfere as good judges which keep wikipedia 'clean up' from 'brilliancies bias'. Regards / Alan Sun---Dralansun (talk) 05:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.  :) Aleta (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vine and Olive Colony[edit]

Just wanted to say thanks for your edits to the Vine and Olive Colony article that I started. You made a great improvement to the flow and grammar. Altairisfartalk 02:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Respected Aleta, Pls read the below page, Do the justice[edit]

I wrote this below letter but my heart felt , you too should read my feeling & help me if you can. How i don't know but this letter is also for you.--Dralansun (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greame[edit]

Ok but if i give or create a website link on news/reviews originally published on Sonee will it be enough to prove his notability, reliability? I want to say to you- no publisher declare exact sale of books in India . Small Publishers of India unlike big publishers of world rarely disclose their sales for one or other reasons of governing laws . And Greame , when a good friend like you say to write/offer a new subject on India philosophy , poets etc. for wiki. In this regard , needless to say - you too had observed the experience with wikipedia people like us have. All is very difficult here . It's self torturing & humiliating to self or for the person , place thing entitled. Years of research sem waste for wiki. i shared my info going through years of research on Indian religion or global. I came across many poet or philosophers but nothing I got substantial. All were as usual poets who are nature lovers,praising sky and moon, flowers, beloved etc. Even you come across copying philosophy of one an another. 'Code name God' has copied Sonee thoughts but person like Sonee laugh and say atleast voice are getting alert and that what he need. Very soon even you will see Sonee's suggestion will be followed concerned/suggestions to LGTB. Among philosophers and poets I accidentally came across this living person Naresh Sonee & I learnt some unique ability is there in this person unlike other professional; poets , religious care takers or philosophers he imitate none but is standing alone against them in a cult like India where his life is at threat.

Graeme, as you have suggested me to write on others' philososophers etc.. - On what ground of guarantee or time of length a person can again go or get involved for a new research Graeme Should only to convince my self that I wrote/contributed something on wikipedia- Should I leave my routine job of regular earning and do all such pain taking research for the sake of convincing myself ability in front of wiki aspiring young moody judges. I don't think they are capable , understandable, matured, reasonable enough to justify any caliber.

Writing on Wikipedia is just like writing on sea shore sand. A smallest undecent wave may ruin all of your writings. It's like children making a fort by using sand on the beach. Yes indeed , what I felt judges on wiki are recruited for their job, even a school students contribute their article or small researches and jump on any page ‘delete or raise a objection’ But I have no complaint on them too. Today they are here tomorrow they may join some BPO, call centre or softwares company. Good luck &God bless all of them. some might even join some publishing houses or become writer or editor of newspapers or become great publishers.Who know what tomorrow has kept ?. Yes many will leave when they will paid more than wiki. Good luck to them. Meanwhile, What I have come across , Almost all on wiki projects are aspiring to become editors or writers by profession. Whereas I am satisfied with my patients. I thought of doing something senseful by sharing my views on a unique person but I failed. I believe there may be hardly any editor in wiki who is a known person of any country , state, city or even a remote village. They have not written any book or never had any newspapers talking on them. Never dared to question the world openly. But their opinion on Sonee was their great acheivment and final. My efforts were deleted as their pleasure. No regret. But as I see some vole enters or checking editors are not matured like you. I wish you good luck on wiki as people like you are angel here but I felt very bad experience of self humiliation on wiki . Nothing I found constructive here . No chance for good people , good voice. LGTB or religious groups or Language , Cult bar is ruling on heads. I have come across stubbed people who are ruling 7 rolling the roost like a snake & ladder game . They tarnish images of good people who stay honest in their approach or efforts to do contribution to uplift mankind.

There are pages on professional people like Britney Spears , Pamela Anderson who contribute nothing more than their nakeness of absurd thoughts and acts to uplift the society Unlike them but people like Sonee are suppressed by rigid [[LGTB}} or religious cult. There are strange thinkers on wiki. No I don't feel to ever go in this hassle of dog fight , where constantly one has to guard the page as a faithful dog of his master’s home and see if no other dog come to bark or bite. Spiting on each other is the game on wikipedia (misusing public donation for raising professional artists or corporate houses ) . Even when my health did’nt permitted but I watched my page 24 hours. so that someone don’t come and spit on it. / destroy it without reasons. Wiki should replace their name . The name should be a engine where ‘dog constantly fights for ever’ & the winner is - who can fight more consistently & cunningly.

Graeme , of course , bias are there on wikipedia . And even you can’t dismiss this fact. This you too will also admit. Also a school boy can come on your page all of a sudden pull your legs on bias acting/posing worse than a 'big school boy' who repeat his class and show muscles on juniors, ragging on classmates who are sober. Wikipedia has become a school / college ragging centre where aspiring writers or soft tool experts want to self tag medal by writing compositions of self praise, self contributions, exhibiting self hobbies, creating self interested debate etc o otherwise. Constructions of lot of big people pages on global people are still not raised there. So many past and present pedias are missing yet.

What I felt in my process of experience with wiki- It work as a two formed gangs of angels and devils. Both are sincerely , seriously opposing each other. But I experienced only a stronger gang survive and weaker gang has no choice but to surrender. The chairpersons should change the systems of wikipedia that is the crucial need of the hour. Everyone is acting judge over one and another. I experienced , I became mad in guarding my page. My regular routine got upset. But how can I do this for ever? Well any search engine is familiar with Sonee or his work . And Graeme do you expect indymedia foolish to sustain his articles of past years.

Greame, I have no hard feeling for persons who had removed my page, But I need you to forward my voice to wikipedia chair persons. with this appeal sent to you. As wiki projects depends on donations of mass. So it should act transparently for/by/of the people. Complete democratic. Voice of people should get register. Good notable voices should not be fooled by foolish and ruled out hopelessly even when original news/review of news papers are attached to the article. Does it show sensibility of responsibility? Is wikipedia the sand on sea shore where anyone can rub & wash. Nothing is permanent secure on wikipedia. Why professional sale of a person or his book must be the criteria of notability or reliability ? . Would wikipedi include Mother Teresa or her work for noble cause or if she prove her or how million her ‘though gott sold’ by professional private penguins. Should only gimmick/ mytho fiction senseless book of children Harry Potter info should wikipedia exchange or expose to a seeker ? Should view of Sonee not reach the world or knowledge hungry seeker bywhat soever news? And are indymedia news or self created news are not news of notability. You mean to say – Only private press like Washington Times can declare reliability or registration of a news ? And only a news which comes from private horses mouth are news & other falls from donkey’s (indemedia’s) mouth. Is wikipedia a private? Corporate ? or free accessible Public Info property which sustain / float/fly on public funds? Is google, yahoo engine hits not enough to show notability? You see from the very start Sonee page was questioned /complained/objected for one or other reasons. However I tried to cover all lame objections of every school boy questioning or joining the debate. What I judged - The stronger gang saw that the page be removed for ever. Does a person have nothing to do in life apart from controlling his raised pages on wikipedia sand where any fool or person with bias come and delete the pain taking research of some one ? Is wikipedia source of un permanent info? Graeme, why my full pages were dismiss is my humble question to wikipedia chairpersons and not their employee . At least two line of info a character or caliber like Sonee deserves? Was there no body to keep two line on this page . Was everthing rigged by me . Is Sonee not a poet ? Is he a nonsense person with nonsense voice or view , in no news ? What these wiki people want to say or establish? A world info is parted here on wiki. A contributor does research and a foolish school boy comes and add/ delete any page. Why such nonsense wiki management entertains? And a known person like Naresh Sonee on search engines or newspapers news is fully deleted by a group of unknown persons who are ‘all unknown’ and hardly contributed nothing so great other than some compositions on wiki or self websites which any school boy is eager to display.

You see LGTB community is very against of Sonee how a person of LGTB give a right judgment on Sonee? And are 5 to 10 people enough to judge Naresh Sonee’s work or name which millions of people or newspapers readers already know in India or otherwise. He has a strong presence in India . And the persons involved who deleted his page are of course in deed ‘un notable persons by any newspapers. They are no poets, no philosophers, no reformers. They can only read and criticize others' work or contribution as public does but they can’t lead to raise constructive voice which Sonee had time & again tried to done.

Wikipedia should not deny to share info of any happening of person, place, performance regardless to how small or big the info or notability is from past or present. A world wide view ( news) or vision coming from any remote place or people should have equal justice to get registered in wikipedia.

Anyway Graeme, I am not a bit disturbed by you. Your cause to delete my page in past was reasonable & you took all pain to guide me reinstall my page. I heartily thank you again. but yes as every good human might spell his mind so exactly I have done here. It’s not my out burst but a sane argument which if person who deleted my page should empathy if s/he is in my position. Administrators should not had cut all links so hurtingly at once urgently. You have helped me a lot as angel so I can’t ask you for more extra favors. But if your Godly instinct feel that a person like Sonee deserve two line on wikipedia info , just write for me or him . You know the subject.

Meanwhile you are in better position to debate this issue. This is not a point of insulting my writings by totally removing them . It’s also like questioning your integrity of editing and improving it which you did. Are they saying that even you are an immature editor to improve and clean-up my page? And what happen to your comment and some good people like you as Aleta who strongly supported my notability of article. Once again, if you feel raise a small page on Sonee and check your self how difficult is to win LGTB or regid religious community. You your self will realize what does bias on a person actually mean? Do it if your God feel. All heart felt & spelt, Graeme forgive me if I have over written in loose sentiments. I opened up with you as my angel. Regards- Alan Sun --Dralansun (talk) 09:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Aleta, You are right. I respect you a lot for you have supported my page without knowing me. You see, Aleta , I am a human not god. it's question of creditability not only mine but also of an entity – identity in question. I provided all the facts what so ever was demanded by wikipedian editors or opposers. But without investigating /verifying my news/reviews on Sonee , the administrator ruthlessly deleted it under influence of 4-5 people. Have they kept two lines over there on the person in question. I would had not raised my voice. Frustration & fighting for my democratic rights are two different issue. You can put me in any slot. It’s your view and mind. However , This might be an inspiration from Sonee to me or person like Gandhi where person has to fight his battle alone. Without dying no body can enjoy heaven. I have learnt form such people –if you are certain to certify self reasoning or common sense considering it ethically right then least care what might the world think of you. One should act and speak right. & that’s what I am doing here. Few people have label my writing as soap box, unreliable etc… God bless them. They don’t know about the person what revolution his voice is going to influence the world in future. Jesus, Kabir did not changed the world in a day. No wikipedia was there then to suppress such voices or sharing their info. Strangely Good or ridiculously bad human one day are in scripted in history. May be Jesus or Bin Laden. So my suggestion to you as a well wisher is never leave your good deed, Person like Graeme & You are rare angel breed. I can feel from my inner sense of little wisdom . I may or may not raise the page on Sonee as my mood is very upset @ present, but ever if couple of you angels feel to raise Sonee page once again any of your good selves can go contribute for the betterment of world welfare deeds. Try it. You will get a peaceful sleep. Because real angels never sleep unless they help a true person in difficulty successfully. They don’t leave the victim in middle of ocean. I am fed up putting my points clicking reading all wiki pages. I have gone mad to convince them. It’s just writing on sand. So, If your instinct feel Sonee deserve two line after reading below talk page of Graeme & Keeper76 feel free to raise a para on Sonee. That is enough for my satisfaction. Read the following links & forward my voice to the ‘Chief Arbitrator Section’ or chair persons directors who run this wiki show biz. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett#Speedy_deletion_of_Web_and_Flo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keeper76 Pls. Push my above voice to the chairperson of wikipedia Graeme & Aleta. God bless yopu always-Alan Sun---Dralansun (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox[edit]

I hope you dont mind that I used this userbox

Pi ≈ 3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 69399 37510 58209 74944 59230 78164 06286 20899 86280 34825 34211 70679 82148 08651 32823 06647 09384 46095 50582 23172 53594 08128 48111 74502 84102 70193 85211 05559 64462 29489 54930 38196 44288 10975 66593 34461 28475 64823 37867 83165 27120 19091 45648 56692 34603 86104 54326 64821 33936 07260 24914 12737 24587 00660 63155 81748 81520 92096 28292 54091 71536 43678 92590 36001 13305 30548 82046 65213 84146 95194 15116 09...

for my userbox page

1bookfan 00:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Not at all... I got it from someone else in fact. Aleta (Sing) 01:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Happy holidays Aleta! I hope you get many gifts under the tree this year hee hee. ;-) Cheers mate! Raystorm (¿Sí?) 19:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LadyofShalott/Archive_3&oldid=1057743090"