User talk:Krikke

Welcome!

Hello, Krikke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

A request to continue using summaries[edit]

As filling in the edit summary field will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article, this greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Murgh ^disc. 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I usually complete the summary field, but must have forgotten. Which page are you watching? Krikke 18:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It was in response to a string of minor uncommented edits of Fr-B comics on my watchlist. Thanks. Murgh ^disc. 18:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign and Belgian films[edit]

HI. I beleive we should always keep the original titles. For instance if you are looking for a Portuguese film in the category with a translated title it will be unrecognizable unless the film has been given a major international rleease and issued under an english title also. My convention is to always state the english in bold in the article beginning,

For me the foreign title of the film is set, it would be like an article on Mont Blanc on wikipedia being called White Mountain or Los Angeles - The Angels. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

. However in regard to the Belgian films I noticed those lnong Belgian titles yesterday especially the earlier films - for these it is best to compact the name into english - most of them refer to an event rather than a familiar title for the film. Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 16:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For instance the title Te Deum à l'église de SS. Michel et Gudule, en l'honneur du roi Albert, le 25 décembre 1909 would look ridiculous!!! The article would be named just SS. Michel et Gudule or something ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 16:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination[edit]

Hi Krikke

well done nominating Category:Belgian animation films for renaming at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 June 5#Category:Belgian_animation_films: a good proposal, which I have supported for consistency with the other sub-categories of Category:Animated films.

However, you did not follow the procedure at WP:CFD#Procedure, so the category was not tagged with {{cfr}}. I have now tagged it. Next time you spot a category like that, please do nominate it at CfD, but also please do try to make sure that it is tagged, so that editors know that it is under discussion.

I now that this must sound very bureaucratic and tedious, but it's all part of how we keep wikipedia working collaboratively, so it is important. I see that you are relatively new to wikipedia, and all these processes can seem rather daunting, so please don't feel bad about having missed one of the steps; we've all been there as we learn our way around!

Good luck, and let me know if I can help with anything. (I'll be away for the next week, but thereafter I'll be around a lot as usual). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BrownHairedGirl. Thanks for pointing that out and sorry for not tagging the category. Yup, relatively new at this and still learning all the processes! Krikke 19:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Belvision.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Belvision.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Taxandria.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Taxandria.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flymetothemoon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flymetothemoon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Nobody[edit]

I rewrote it so we don't have to specify the languages. Would that work? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! —Erik (talk • contrib) 16:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Films about Belgian citizens[edit]

I have nominated Category:Films about Belgian citizens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Krikke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Krikke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Krikke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]