User talk:Koconder

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
Quick Introductions to:

Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?

What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?[edit]

If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

article talk pages[edit]

Hi, talk pages for articles are located at Talk:Article, not Article (talk). Just a heads up. ansh 666 05:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to shaving[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you made an edit to the shaving article regarding acne. While I think it is important to mention acne in the section on cuts, I felt that what you included was a little bit to close to a how-to, and ran contrary to WP:NOTADVICE. It was also copied directly from the source without proper use of quotation (see WP:PLAGARISM). I paraphrased your contribution and moved it earlier in the section. I have left the source as-is but keep in mind that commercial/promotional websites are generally not considered reliable and scholarly sources are preferred. Thanks! Kingxiang (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kingxiang, thanks for the comments, i try my best to contribute as i read content on wikipedia and read online publications, will try to keep in mind for future Koconder (talk) 04:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Onder Vincent Koc, Istanbul 2012.jpg[edit]

The file File:Onder Vincent Koc, Istanbul 2012.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FT-Logo-onLight.jpg[edit]

The file File:FT-Logo-onLight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unused file was made obsolete by an SVG version that wasn't based off this raster.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ductwork (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent koc moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Vincent koc. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 16:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent koc (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I do not think you will ever get an article on him accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vincent koc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koconder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § ‎AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 14:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]