User talk:Kingofmann

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

Final warning[edit]

Revert the talk page one more time, and you will be blocked. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 13:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Repeated deletion of comments at Talk:David Howe (claimant to King of Mann)‎ and incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 13:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): As per B's note below. However, you should have a read of WP:CIVIL before writing edit summaries in Caps again. Request handled by: пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 14:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin[edit]

The claim that he "was blocked for deleting edits by users including the blocking administrator" refers to the fact that I reverted his blanking of other users' edits, rather than adding any content myself. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 14:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'll bite - that possible use could that thread have to do with writing an encyclopedia article about David Howe? Talk pages are not chat rooms and off-topic discussion can and should be removed on demand, particularly if it is making an unfounded accusation about a living person. Unless that accusation is (1) substantiated and (2) related to writing an encyclopedia article, it should be removed and you should undo your block. --B (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 89.149.244.184 lifted or expired. Request handled by: пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of comments from Talk:David Howe (claimant to King of Mann)[edit]

Please reconsider your actions; this thread was closed as archived by the admin who unblocked you. Moreover, it is true to say that a sockpuppet case is open, which rather disproves that the specific comment from DrKiernan is libellous. --Kife 16:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann[edit]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren ^(talk) 01:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Kingofmann[edit]

This arbitration case has been dismissed and the final decision is available at the link above. The community can take care of this entire issue itself -- the article has been deleted and User:Kingofmann has departed wikipedia. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]