User talk:Keycard1Slot

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keycard1Slot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for being a Sockpuppet. I know that it is against the guidelines, but because I made mistakes and I don't want them to be recorded on my account, so I created multiple accounts. If I am unblocked, I would pledge to have an administrator to delete all my alternative accounts. I will try my best not to break the rules. Keycard1Slot (talk) 04:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock disussion

Well, let's start with listing all of your other accounts.-- Deepfriedokra 04:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I will note for the reviewer that this came about due to the discussion here. 331dot (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

​As my elder brother told you, I am his little brother. Why did Bbb23 block him for being a sockpuppet (He told me about that)? Not only he isn’t a sockpuppet of mine, but also he put the userbox {{User shared IP address}} already. Keycard1Slot (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

​This is a list of the accounts I remember:

• Bank Robbery
• Bank - Floor-Deductions
• Presidential Vault— Preceding unsigned comment added by Keycard1Slot (talk • contribs)

So you may have had other accounts that you don't remember? 331dot (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@331dot: I just checked the log. Two more: Duuvud and Vault 1 - Floor-Deductions. Keycard1Slot (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

​Vault 1 - Floor-Deductions didn't have any contributions. A user without edits should not be blocked. Why did Bbb23 still block my alt account? Keycard1Slot (talk) 03:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

If you are blocked under any account, you cannot use any account until that block is removed. Blocks are on the individual, not the account. 331dot (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock discussion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keycard1Slot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, I was offline for almost 8 months. I'm back here to request an unblock.

I do admit that I am a sockpuppet.

I'm sorry for making so many accounts, in fact, I created them to make my main account have better records. If I am unblocked, I will either continue using this account or put {{retired}} on this page. I will not make any more accounts, I promise.

Decline reason:

Unresponsive to request for editing examples to help us understand how productive this account will be if unblocked. only (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Keycard1Slot (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

I have several questions for you:

If you want to retire, as you say, then why do you need to be unblocked?

If you do not want to retire, please tell us what kind of edits you want to make. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Vanjagenije: Well for the retire thing, is that I will create a new account but put the retired template on this page, so that indicates I do not use this account anymore.

I would like to make good edits if I am unblocked, plus I promise not to be a sockpuppet anymore.

Keycard1Slot (talk) 03:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

{{Checkuser needed}} Can some checkuser check if there was recent socking from this account? I think the user deserves a second chance, but since this is a checkuserblock, I need a CU to clear unblocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

No socking immediately visible. I give CheckUser consent to this being reviewed as a normal admin block. However, as an ordinary admin action I strongly suggest that the current unblock request is not convincing enough to unblock. If I were the reviewing administrator, I would require Keycard1Slot to offer a convincing explanation of why the edits made by the socks (such as Special:Contribs/Bank_Robbery) were disruptive and why they will not recut recur. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Keycard1Slot: Please, answer the question. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Vanjagenije: @L235: Well I don't really know how to convince people that I deserved to be unblocked, I really don't know how to write it. I, of course, wish to be unblocked and not to be a sockpuppet anymore, as it violates the Wikipedia guidelines. The edits made by my socks were indeed disruptive, as some of them just added wikilinks. I will always check if I really need to edit that page if I am unblocked. Keycard1Slot (talk) 02:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Keycard1Slot. I don't doubt your good faith: that is, that if I unblock you, you'll want to contribute well. What I'm asking you for is to demonstrate that the contributions that you plan on making will actually be productive. I ask this because your sock at Special:Contributions/Bank_Robbery was entirely unproductive and generated over 500 edits, of which not a single one seemed actually, you know, useful. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@L235: Plan? That’s hard to say. Of course, I don’t wanna vandalise Wikipedia and make it a trash encyclopaedia.

Well if I am unblocked, I will retire this account and start a new one to avoid harassment. I think this is ok to do so, right?

Well then on the new account I would like to make some useful edits to Wikipedia. I’m not really sure how to say what the plan is after being unblocked.

Keycard1Slot (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

​ hello?

Can you give us examples of two or three edits you would like to make? I mean, precise edits you plan to make, so that we can evaluate your potential editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Vanjagenije: Sure.

• Some pages have {{extinguish}} but it is not a template but rather some italic text at the top of the page.
• Try to find sources to cite information that lack citations.

Is that ok? Keycard1Slot (talk) 13:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I was talking about specific edits to specific articles. You can use the process described at Template:2nd chance, but you don't have to. I just want you to give us examples of specific edits to specific articles you would make if unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)