User talk:Ketiltrout/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nomination of ArtsFest (Florida) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ArtsFest (Florida) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtsFest (Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Cecil Hotel (Calgary) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability. It appears that the place had a certain level of notoriety, but it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirements.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 20:02, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 23:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: Peaces of Pressburg
No problem. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Your requested article about Guaíra Airport made on June 19, 2012 is available. Enjoy! (Brunoptsem (talk) 11:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC))
Gonga (band)
Gonga (band), which you created is being discussed for possible deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry.
The article may be edited during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article, please. Thank you. —Myxomatosis75 (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
OH 8
Why did you move "OH 8" to "OH8", when none of the three options given typically include a space in their abbreviation? --Golbez (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Activated debates
Hi Ketiltrout. I invite you to feedback on my views in Talk:List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations, I'm encouraging all involved since January to do so.Adam37 (talk) 10:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cosmetic Valley may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- illustrated by the introduction of foreign groups such as [[Reckitt Benckiser]], but also [[small and medium enterprises (SMEs/SMBs) who joined the sector. Cosmetic Valley boasts the
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The article WARP (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 15:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The article SC21 (United Kingdom) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 01:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RAHS may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Rochester Area High School (Pennsylvania)]] in Rochester, Pennsylvania), United States
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to AFA may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[Asatru Folk Assembly]], formerly Asatru Free Assembly)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Merger proposal
As a main editor of Legende, I am calling your attention to Talk:Legend_(disambiguation)#Merger_proposal.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Since you took the time to consider the issues at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal, I am hoping you might help us consider a related issue at Talk:Legends (TV series)#Call for a vote on hatnote for this page.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- So far, about half of the people who took part in the recent merger discussion have considered this related matter and half haven't. This leaves us on the border between consensus and no consensus. It would be great if could take a moment to consider the simple matter at Talk:Legends (TV series)#Call for a vote on hatnote for this page. A few more voices should make it clear if there is a consensus opinion or not.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Merging partial disambig pages
Howdy. I see you have gone ahead and merged a load of partial disambig pages; good job. Unfortunately it looks like (in some cases) you've done this without checking that the content has been merged properly. To give an example, James D. Smith was created because it had incoming links related to more than one person - here "James D. Smith, president of the New York Stock Exchange 1886 - 1888" and "James D. Smith, Comptroller of Connecticut, 1881-1882". However, the page to which this title now redirects (James Smith) doesn't mention the first of these at all.
A reasonable amount of effort went into tracking down some of these and establishing that several similarly named people were involved; can I check that you intend to merge the now missing entries please ? - TB (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
capital letter namespace
Howdy. This redirect leads to a disambiguation page - why was it moved to Capital letter in the second word? Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake - I started off referring to the "redirect", then somehow switched to "move". At any rate, do you have the 'powers' to kill (speedy delete) the existing Extension service, so we can move Extension Service? Thanks, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mila (given name), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mtv.com/artists/mila/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Wild Arabia, Wild Brazil
Greetings Ketiltrout, I was wondering whether you could create two pages for Wild Arabia TV series (2013) and Wild Brazil TV series (2014). It's because they are part of the BBC Natural History Unit's Continents strand, which all other series in the strand have pages of their own, Wild Arabia is narrated by Alexander Siddig, while Wild Brazil is narrated by Stephen Mangan. Both series have 3 episodes each. I think the website "Docuwiki" has a lot of information on each of them and also the BBC websites for them. They both aired on BBC Two. In the strand, Wild Arabia succeeds Madagascar with David Attenborough and proceeds Wild Brazil, while Wild Brazil succeeds Wild Arabia and, to my knowledge has no series yet that succeeds it. If you can create the pages or know someone who can it would be greatly appreciated by myself, if you can't do it then no worries, thanks, --Emperorofthedaleks (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|
Eat, food! —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 07:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For creating the Hij page. Maharayamui (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC) |
Wrong letters in HFZ - the content is about HHZ. Minor mistake? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 10:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 23 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council. Since you had some involvement with the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Ketiltrout. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Joh. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joh.. Since you had some involvement with the Joh. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 02:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
The article Five Corners, Perth Amboy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not have significant secondary source coverage. Fails WP:NGEO
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Gib
Thanks for your message of 2017-08-13, but this was probably not my edit! my last was 10:47, 5 September 2014 History Saludos Timpo (talk) 08:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
MOS:DAB
Hi. Can you explain me the acronym MOS:DAB in your summary please? Thanks. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ketiltrout. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
WP DAB banner
Hi, there's no need to put {{WP DAB}} on the talk pages of disambiguation pages unless they also happen to have some other content. You can see the template's documentation for links to previous discussions, but the tldr version is that it serves no purpose and that it gets in the way of future maintenance. – Uanfala (talk) 13:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, I must have missed that point. Thanks for the heads up.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 13:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for the work on List of villages in Mawal taluka FITINDIA 21:44, 19 January 2018 (UTC) |
The article York University (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proposing this dab for deletion; hatnotes on the primary topic article will suffice.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Mentiri) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mentiri, Ketiltrout!
Wikipedia editor Gaioa just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
There we are, the worst problems fixed and tagged for other improvements. But inclusion is no problem.
To reply, leave a comment on Gaioa's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thank you. Gaioa (t,c,l) 14:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
New Page Patrol?
Hi Ketiltrout,
I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join New Page Patrol, and from your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; we could use some additional help from an experienced user like yourself.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR.
Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 12:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of TechNet (lobbying organization) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TechNet (lobbying organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechNet (lobbying organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Majora (talk) 23:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Basler Turbo BT-67
Hello, Ketiltrout,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Basler Turbo BT-67 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basler Turbo BT-67 .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Northwave (business security) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northwave (business security) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwave (business security) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
EDO
I do not agree with what you've done. Pretty much all of the major uses are lower case (Edo, Edo State, Edo period). If you must merge them then the dab page should be at Edo (disambiguation) instead. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Also, why have you removed valid entries from Ego? Why are you removing descriptions? Are you by any chance using Dabfix? —Xezbeth (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Edo I'd support a move to Edo (disambiguation). I merged the pages into EDO because that's where Edo (disambiguation) was originally split from. Had I done it the other way, I think it would have essentially been a copy-paste move.
- Ego I found one entry (Willy William) I shouldn't have deleted. I put it back. Thanks for catching it. The only other entry I can see that I removed was the Macklemore song, which is not mentioned in the target article. Are there more? Regarding descriptions, my reading of MOSDAB is that descriptions should only be used to disambiguate otherwise ambiguous terms in the dab list. An entry like European Gravitational Observatory is self-describing and doesn't need to be further disambiguated on that page. I do not use Dabfix. Cheers,—Ketil Trout (<><!) 23:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Ketiltrout. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sharpe's rifles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sharpe's rifles. Since you had some involvement with the Sharpe's rifles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if you have any specific interest in Ethiopia, but I saw that you had made some sensible edits, and since I see no WikiProject:Ethiopia, I don't know who to refer this mess to. I don't know how it can be handled but hopefully someone does. --Thnidu (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Never mind. I found the anonymous insertion of that text, with WikiBlame, and restored the valued text it had replaced, as well as the first word of the article. --Thnidu (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Away from keyboard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Away from keyboard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Away from keyboard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:10, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Antonin Jean Desormeaux birth and death date
Hello! Could you please add the source from which you got the birth and death dates for Antonin Jean Desormeaux? Thank you! --HighFlyingFish (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed! Thanks for noticing.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 17:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for adding it! --HighFlyingFish (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Straža redirect
I believe it should be redirected Straza --> Straža as most of places have that name.
Also, resulting Straža is duplicate of Straza in Wikidata. AndrejJ (talk) 08:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- On the English Wikipedia, because English speakers are generally unfamiliar with diacritics, consolidating different DAB pages with variant diacritics into a single page is somewhat the norm. Among English speakers, letters like "Z" and "Ž" aren't generally considered distinct (unless the speaker is familiar with, say, Serbo-Croatian).
- But thanks for reminding me about those WikiData entries. I meant to check them but then got distracted by other matters. I believe you're correct: they are duplicates. I've done my best to merge them: I've moved EN DE and IT to wikidata:Q2289970 since that's going to be more helpful for everyone. Unfortunately, the presence of both ceb:Straza and ceb:Straža (which also appear to be duplicates) means they can't be fully merged. Cheers,—Ketil Trout (<><!) 00:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Donald Patrick Harvey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Patrick Harvey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Patrick Harvey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Archana (Hinduism) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced for over a decade and no obvious redirect targets.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 09:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Day of mourning (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Day of mourning (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
"EJD" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect EJD. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 25#EJD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hair of the Dog
Hello, Ketiltrout
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hair of the Dog for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bensci54 (talk) 16:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Socialist Unity (United States) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not referenced.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
HNDIS compression
Hi Ketiltrout. I have reverted your edits to Wilson (surname). As a contributor to Wikipedia, I frequently come across a reference to (say) A. Wilson, who is a Queensland politician. Can I link to an existing article, or must I start a new one, even a stub. It's bad enough that many biographical articles don't make it to the indexes, without having to guess what the given name might be. Cheers, Doug butler (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
"Sunnydale-syndrome" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sunnydale-syndrome. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 25#Sunnydale-syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern Eye
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eastern Eye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Eye. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Princepratap1234 (talk) 05:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
RfD
Hello - please remember to sign contributions to WP:RfD. I corrected a recent batch. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Gah! You're right. Thanks.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 20:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Impala (DC Comics) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impala (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
disambiguator for Mrčevo
Please note [1]. TIA. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Cheers,—Ketil Trout (<><!) 03:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The article THEM (2004 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable TV special. The current article in completely unsourced, and I was unable to find any reliable sources mentioning this special in searches.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 19:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
April 2022
Hello, I'm Mattdaviesfsic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Belmont railway station have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
"San Francisco (song))" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect San Francisco (song)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#San Francisco (song)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)