User talk:Kestevenc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kestevenc, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Kestevenc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Simon Edge[edit]

Hi, I'm NearEMPTiness. Kestevenc, thanks for creating Simon Edge!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a good start. I recommend changing the bare URLs in the references to hyperlinks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ash Dykes has been accepted[edit]

Ash Dykes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 06:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenny Boyle has been accepted[edit]

Kenny Boyle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josh Berry (comedian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ohme. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohme (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm baffled by the reason cited for this rejection. All the references were from press coverage, including from national newspapers as well as the motoring trade press and a website owned by the Financial Times. Whoever reviewed this article submission has not been fair to it Kestevenc (talk) 18:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ohme has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ohme. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks yes, I tried to edit the disambiguation page, but the edit hasn't survived and I guess woudn't make sense until the draft is approved. I wasn't quite sure how to resolve that one Kestevenc (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Cattini has been accepted[edit]

Joe Cattini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Liancetalk 14:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for approving that so quickly Kestevenc (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thank you Kestevenc (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohme (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by F.Alexsandr was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
F.Alexsandr (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]