User talk:Kensternation
Re: Artifacts[edit]
I simply don't see the point in doing so; the page is about the artifacts and gadgets seen in the show, so all that is really needed is to point out which of the items mentioned are one of the few gadgets, as compared to adding "(Artifact)" to every artifact item. --Bold Clone (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
June 2012[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Quassy Amusement Park, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Make up your mind please[edit]
If you'd like to have an actual discussion of how I handle unsourced material, please follow protocol and post a new thread at the bottom of my Talk page, and please lose the sarcasm and antagonism. If you don't care about having an actual discussion on the matter, please stop posting to my Talk page on this matter. If you continue to make non-constructive comments in the middle of my Talk page I will consider it harassment and take appropriate action. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 15:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
ANI[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)unblock request[edit]
Kensternation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As I have not been a disruption in the past and have not disrupted recently I see no reason for the ban. Doniago, of course did not mention the fact that he goes around deleting other people's works for no other reason than there is no source cited. According to Wikipedia's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V there is no need for citation's unless the information is challenged. What gives him the right to summarily delete information without challenging it first. I believe that is a greater disruption to the wiki community at large than asking someone on their talk page to stop and desist. If anyone should be blocked it is Doniago. Kensternation (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM. Max Semenik (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Reviewing admin, please see this ANI discussion before unblocking. Thanks. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
unblock request[edit]
Kensternation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I asked another user to stop and desist deleting other people's works. I have contributed in the past, though not often. When I do make a change to a page it is because I feel I have something to contribute, so if someone comes along and deletes my work I am insulted. Maybe it was overkill to post several time to the user's page to stop deleting pages due to lack of citations, but rather challenge the information. I understand the repeated attempts to make the other user stop may be considered harassment, but I feel that the wikipedia guideline for challenging before deleting information is an important one. I will cease and desist from unwarranted postings on other people's talk pages.Kensternation (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
..."deletes my work"; "may be...BUT"? I don't see actual understanding that the behaviour was inappropriate, nor do I see verification that the reversion will not recur. WP:BRD is key to obtaining WP:CONSENSUS (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)