User talk:Kees at Hukseflux

Welcome!

Hello, Hukseflux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Proposed deletion of Schmidt Boelter gauge[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Schmidt Boelter gauge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Zanaq (?) 14:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kees at Hukseflux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kees at Hukseflux

Decline reason:

OK, so, this account was blocked for in 2008 for promotional editing. But you just created another account, User:Peter at Hukseflux, and you've done exactly the same thing, so I've blocked that one also. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So I'm curious as to why you have waited 14 years to request unblock. Promotional editing is also part of the block. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish people would not remove the block notice. I will rename. Not unblock -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is a good question. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Hukseflux to Kees at Hukseflux[edit]

globally renamed Hukseflux to Kees at Hukseflux -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]