User talk:Karkanistan

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Nitin Mukesh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Nitin Mukesh. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed incorrect information. YouTube videos are not a reliable source.

Ah, good call. I'm restoring your changes. Next time, make sure to explain your changes with an edit summary ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, and I'll be happy to help. Thanks again for responding and explaining your changes :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Karkanistan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20984 was submitted on Mar 23, 2018 14:00:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

This user has engaged in block evasion in July, 2019 as UserGK23. --Yamla (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is block evasion? How could I be doing block evasion when I had forgotten that this account even existed. It had been a whole year since I used this account.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karkanistan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

account is year old, forgot I had itKarkanistan (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not convincing that you forgot about an account where you were blocked on the same day that you last responded. Your very first edits with this account were to ask how to open a sockpuppet investigation so you know that undeclared multiple accounts are verboten. It looks like block evasion to me.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user they accused me of being a sockpuppet of is an year old account which I had forgot even existed so I created a new account and was accused. I had not used multiple accounts for winning arguments or anything like that because I had forgot the account Karkanistan even existed until it was brought up here.

This user named Atlantic306 said " says he doesnt have time to make as many edits as another editor who has a large number of edits suggesting he has a larger amount of edits under different accounts". I don't know what he meant by that honestly. I said I didn't have time to make edits and revert edits every day like Fylindfotberserk (who apparently has been doing this for the last ten years) because I have more important things to do with my time than be on Wikipedia all day and argue with strangers I don't know about things that do not matter and things which have zero affect on my personal life. I simply stand for the truth and I believe information shared on Wikipedia should be presented in as much an unbiased way as possible.

I don't know where I "suggested" that another user may have more edits under different accounts. I have no idea what he's talking about and need that cleared up.

(Copied from here - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:UserGK23) Karkanistan (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What did you imply here Atlantic306?[edit]

Atlantic306

On https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Karkanistan you said "says he doesnt have time to make as many edits as another editor who has a large number of edits suggesting he has a larger amount of edits under different accounts". What exactly are you implying here? What was I "suggesting"? Just needed that cleared up. Karkanistan (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]